Row 899

Content Data

This page contains data entry 899 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Raw Record

{
  "text": "| sub | archive |\n|-----|---------|\n| `r/BenShapiro` | https://archive.ph/O4csa |\n| `r/Republican` | https://archive.ph/QNgs0 |\n| `r/conservatives` | https://archive.ph/WB1Fb |\n\n(You can [find the links](https://i.imgur.com/5egNPpt.png) to the actual threads in the archives)\n\ntext of the meme/tweet:\n\n> I'm not anti-vaccine. I might have gotten one. I wanted to wait and see how it worked. But then you shut down all other treatments. And then you insisted people shouldn't be allowed to work without one. Now you insist boosters are needed.\n>\n> I've seen all I need to see.\n\n \n\n1. The only treatments that were \"shut down\" (if you ignore Trump's \"sarcastic\" suggestion of injecting disinfectant and UV-light) were Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. Both drugs initially looked promising but randomized controlled trials have since proven that both are useless against COVID-19. They weren't actually \"shut down\", of course, but nearly all medical associations strongly recommend against their use as COVID-19 treatments.\n    \n    Hydroxychloroquine also turned out to be risky for COVID-19 patients. Potential side effect of Hydroxychloroquine includes heart problems. Since COVID-19 may also cause heart problems, the mixture can be deadly.\n    \n    Ivermectin might be less dangerous but it is not meant to be used over a long period of time. Certain people insist that it can be used prophylactically. It cannot. Not only does Ivermectin have no prophylactic properties against COVID-19, long term consumption can lead to poisoning. Consuming veterinary Ivermectin can also be poisonous since the doses tend to be far too high for humans.\n    \n    None of this has anything to do with the vaccines, of course. To claim that the uselessness of Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin proves anything about the vaccines makes no sense whatsoever. It's a non sequitur. This \"argument\" by `r/BenShapiro`, `r/Republican` and `r/conservatives` is bad reasoning.\n2. The reason why vaccine mandates have become necessary are people like the ones who visit `r/BenShapiro`, `r/Republican` and `r/conservatives`. Vaccine mandates have become necessary because certain people refuse to get vaccinated.\n    \n    They refuse to get vaccinated even though it is proven that the vaccines reduce the risk of infection, the risk of transmission, the risk of hospitalization and the risk of death. They refuse to get vaccinated even though the risks of adverse effects from vaccination are minimal and pale in comparison to the much greater risks of COVID-19. They refuse to get vaccinated even though the vaccine is offered to them for free.\n    \n    The reason vaccine mandates have become necessary is that people like the ones who frequent `r/BenShapiro`, `r/Republican` and `r/conservatives` refuse to see reason. So here we have the very people who have made the mandates necessary, complaining about the mandates. It's not some nebulous entity who is to blame for the mandates, it's them. They are the reason vaccine mandates have become unavoidable. Again, their \"argument\" is bad reasoning.\n3. Booster shots were never ruled out. Many vaccines need booster shots. It would have been nonsensical to categorically rule out that the COVID-19 vaccines require boosters. \"Conservatives\" love to feign surprise at the necessity of booster shots but no one ever told them boosters would not be necessary.\n    \n    Unfortunately, it since turned out that the protection from the COVID-19 vaccines wanes rather quickly. Since the first doses we have learned that the protection lasts about six months. As we now know, after six months, even a person who was considered fully vaccinated before should be considered unvaccinated again unless they get a booster. With the arrival of the Omicron variant, some medical associations have begun to recommend getting a booster after only three months.\n    \n    None of this an \"argument\" against vaccination. So what if you have to get a booster? So what if you have to get it sooner than expected? The vaccines still protect you from COVID-19. The vaccines still have negligible adverse effects. The booster is free just like the first two doses. Laziness is no excuse not to protect yourself and others from a pandemic. Laziness is not an argument. Arguing from laziness is bad reasoning.  \n\nNone of this proves that the vaccines are ineffective - let alone dangerous. All of these objections are dumb slogans at best. The conclusion \"I've seen all I need to see\" is bad reasoning. The entire tweet/meme is nothing but thoughtless antivaxx propaganda. And antivaxx propaganda is dangerous. This kind of disinformation might influence people not to get a potentially life-saving vaccine. This kind of disinformation kills.",
  "label": "r/disinformationwatch",
  "dataType": "post",
  "communityName": "r/DisinformationWatch",
  "datetime": "2021-12-28",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakx6ODZKM0N5a3JzTGZXZ1dFTy1PTVhTTkxjaWhjUmJPblhtZkphU0lGanhEcF9CT3JYa1JSdk5FYlp6THlFNTVudU5RN3B5MHlxMERvVGVZZV82Z1FQMnc9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9EQnBsVDVJNkRCWk5DaHFuZE5iVTNqaTNaQW9pcjNfbnhrd3BTSXZ0NVFZb2RTUzY1dVBoa0VobDJSZ0pKU280X24wcDRRdjh1MmVVcVk2VGhsMDhrNEU2WDA1SkpYbWhUNklQeGVVQWJPVjFjajhtSkVIS2tnNFhkaDRmdWU5TmtYVmZJS1B1NW84ZUVEZ2poWWM0RVFsMFdVUVRYV0JxQ0c5TG9TRU13TG1mWDRrWmxyNmdtX3ZVcDA1WHVFNWdLTzRfYWxKNjhmRzZDYmE5eVB2ajdpdz09"
}

Entry Information

• Entry ID: 899
• Repository: Axioma AXP
• Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
• Total Entries: 100,000