Row 7537

Row ID: 7537 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 7537 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

I just got done drafting an email with the Chat Mac app and yeah, I never wanna do this any other way again. This was not a dictation; this was me fumbling and stuttering through a hazy recollection of a meeting I'd had as the model listened ("no worries," it said at one point, "take your time"); answering a few follow up questions as it sought clarity and further details; and then listening to it read back a drafted email based on my recollection of events. I know the previous voice model could do some of this already but it didn't feel this organic; more like a juiced up Siri with a slightly more natural voic. The fact that this isn't even the dynamic voice model we saw in the showcase is wild to me. I've also been running generated text from 4o through AI detectors and its output performs way better than model 4 did. It all leads me to believe that they prioritized mimicking humanness with this 4o model than other kinds of performance. So while I might revert to 4 for more complex tasks (I don't think 4o peforms quite as well), 4o really does feel great when interaction is involved.

Any one else had a different experience?

FieldValue
text I just got done drafting an email with the Chat Mac app and yeah, I never wanna do this any other way again. This was not a dictation; this was me fumbling and stuttering through a hazy recollection of a meeting I'd had as the model listened ("no worries," it said at one point, "take your time"); answering a few follow up questions as it sought clarity and further details; and then listening to it read back a drafted email based on my recollection of events. I know the previous voice model could…
label r/openai
dataType post
communityName r/OpenAI
datetime 2024-05-16
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakwzby1LYUZrdVpKXzRwQnE4Q2w1NmlPeFVrNENBT0RHbWRjNHVlajk4SFRjSE1VQXd5VG9BdklaQTdXdDZoTHh1ZFdoaGRvWmUyZTM2bV93QXFDLS1Sa3c9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9Idm1YYlFPWnR5NGdzSEFSZjdYUzdsMk95dERWamE1VlVLODdMMkpVcldGM2p6MFllVXRuOHRXenVmalIxZGxwdXY5N2l5X1U0WFhwV3RZc2RRUTI5MlJ4U0FNb1pxTXdteS0yUUJ1OHZOeUFsLV81V2R6QWI2X29FaU11ZXFTZkd3c2pEbTZXQUY3dzRtN1pUcXA2LW5TbHZiWkIxTnd6M2l5U2JMZ0xrR2NBPQ==

Raw Record

{
  "text": "I just got done drafting an email with the Chat Mac app and yeah, I never wanna do this any other way again. This was not a dictation; this was me fumbling and stuttering through a hazy recollection of a meeting I'd had as the model listened (\"no worries,\" it said at one point, \"take your time\"); answering a few follow up questions as it sought clarity and further details; and then listening to it read back a drafted email based on my recollection of events. I know the previous voice model could do some of this already but it didn't feel this organic; more like a juiced up Siri with a slightly more natural voic. The fact that this isn't even the dynamic voice model we saw in the showcase is wild to me. \n \nI've also been running generated text from 4o through AI detectors and its output performs way better than model 4 did. \n \nIt all leads me to believe that they prioritized mimicking humanness with this 4o model than other kinds of performance. So while I might revert to 4 for more complex tasks (I don't think 4o peforms quite as well), 4o really does feel great when interaction is involved. \n\nAny one else had a different experience?",
  "label": "r/openai",
  "dataType": "post",
  "communityName": "r/OpenAI",
  "datetime": "2024-05-16",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakwzby1LYUZrdVpKXzRwQnE4Q2w1NmlPeFVrNENBT0RHbWRjNHVlajk4SFRjSE1VQXd5VG9BdklaQTdXdDZoTHh1ZFdoaGRvWmUyZTM2bV93QXFDLS1Sa3c9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9Idm1YYlFPWnR5NGdzSEFSZjdYUzdsMk95dERWamE1VlVLODdMMkpVcldGM2p6MFllVXRuOHRXenVmalIxZGxwdXY5N2l5X1U0WFhwV3RZc2RRUTI5MlJ4U0FNb1pxTXdteS0yUUJ1OHZOeUFsLV81V2R6QWI2X29FaU11ZXFTZkd3c2pEbTZXQUY3dzRtN1pUcXA2LW5TbHZiWkIxTnd6M2l5U2JMZ0xrR2NBPQ=="
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information