Row 32019

Row ID: 32019 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 32019 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Generally at the very minimum you'd want some sort of peer review, even if it doesn't determine validity it at least filters complete bullshit. Though this isn't peer reviewed, it's just posted on their own website so this article is really no more reliable than a long reddit comment.

Unless of course you want to go the route of ascribing some authoritative property to the authors, but then we get into the original problem of discrediting based on the authors.

It should be noted that this article is entirely secondary research (reporting results from collections of primary sources) with commentary from the authors and zero primary research (new independent research and data collection)

The only thing that is really novel in this report is the author commentary. So it kind of is up to how much you trust the authors.

FieldValue
text Generally at the very minimum you'd want some sort of peer review, even if it doesn't determine validity it at least filters complete bullshit. Though this isn't peer reviewed, it's just posted on their own website so this article is really no more reliable than a long reddit comment. Unless of course you want to go the route of ascribing some authoritative property to the authors, but then we get into the original problem of discrediting based on the authors. It should be noted that this art…
label r/economics
dataType comment
communityName r/Economics
datetime 2024-05-21
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1HS3VqQU1qSlNaNHJHeGpGQURicHZFREtFNEdXX0h4Mm9WOGpkVmpMRmNTcUk5NHlyZ2JLXzRRcENPRGZ4UU1IekwtTHlfUDJEUXJEbV91RGE5cnNuNkE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9XVDdPSWt2OTk0M09vc1M1YzVSYjNvQ0FTdEdfVEN6RFAySFo0UHVyek4yU3RXZXNfUzJtdnJXQWNkR25PUUxRRkpIcGZPNGFDZFZYb05vS2dtRF9CU1V5UDdjS2NlNmRQeVpCM3ZMMnVFR3RFYlJ6ejhCNFBISlFwTW9oa1VldGI1Smw4UDh2WFV5ckRyam1aaEVKYU5Rem9jczZrZG9fRzZJUnVhVjBTWk9Tc2p6dldGMDgxVXpFb29HZzJhY3JXOW1VX20zQ1BRMGgzYk5JNEt5bm1Hdz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Generally at the very minimum you'd want some sort of peer review, even if it doesn't determine validity it at least filters complete bullshit.  Though this isn't peer reviewed, it's just posted on their own website so this article is really no more reliable than a long reddit comment.\n\nUnless of course you want to go the route of ascribing some authoritative property to the authors, but then we get into the original problem of discrediting based on the authors.\n\nIt should be noted that this article is entirely secondary research (reporting results from collections of primary sources) with commentary from the authors and zero primary research (new independent research and data collection)\n\nThe only thing that is really novel in this report is the author commentary.  So it kind of is up to how much you trust the authors.",
  "label": "r/economics",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/Economics",
  "datetime": "2024-05-21",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1HS3VqQU1qSlNaNHJHeGpGQURicHZFREtFNEdXX0h4Mm9WOGpkVmpMRmNTcUk5NHlyZ2JLXzRRcENPRGZ4UU1IekwtTHlfUDJEUXJEbV91RGE5cnNuNkE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9XVDdPSWt2OTk0M09vc1M1YzVSYjNvQ0FTdEdfVEN6RFAySFo0UHVyek4yU3RXZXNfUzJtdnJXQWNkR25PUUxRRkpIcGZPNGFDZFZYb05vS2dtRF9CU1V5UDdjS2NlNmRQeVpCM3ZMMnVFR3RFYlJ6ejhCNFBISlFwTW9oa1VldGI1Smw4UDh2WFV5ckRyam1aaEVKYU5Rem9jczZrZG9fRzZJUnVhVjBTWk9Tc2p6dldGMDgxVXpFb29HZzJhY3JXOW1VX20zQ1BRMGgzYk5JNEt5bm1Hdz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information