Row 95228
Content Data
This page contains data entry 95228 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
>Storing value is a use.
Actually, you are right. Storing value is a use. It just isn't a use that can give bitcoin a value.
>There is a market for Bitcoin therfore Bitcoin has value.
As a logical statement, it is true.
As a causal statement, it is a fallacy reversing the cause and the effect. It is true that bitcoin having a value would cause a market for it to exist. Therefore, bitcoin having a value is the cause and the existence of the market for bitcoin is the effect.
>The fact that the network is slow means the primary use case for Bitcoin at the present moment is as a store of value.
Wrong. The *store of value* use is just *secondary*. Anything used as a store value must have some *primary* use case to get value, and only then it can become a store of value - you cannot store value in something not having a value. You seem to struggle to reveal what the primary use case for bitcoin is.
>improve lawyer two solutions
Lol. Hope you will find out what the word "lawyer" means.
> There is probably a use case for some type of stablecoin to peg against BTC.
It certainly is possible to peg a stablecoin against BTC. However, similarly as the *store of value* use case, it is just a *secondary* use case.
>To prove that Bitcoin doesn't have value you must explain...
It is not possible to prove that bitcoin does not have value, since Bitcoin does have a value. It does have a *primary* use, but the majority of people, including yourself do not know what it is.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | >Storing value is a use. Actually, you are right. Storing value is a use. It just isn't a use that can give bitcoin a value. >There is a market for Bitcoin therfore Bitcoin has value. As a logical statement, it is true. As a causal statement, it is a fallacy reversing the cause and the effect. It is true that bitcoin having a value would cause a market for it to exist. Therefore, bitcoin having a value is the cause and the existence of the market for bitcoin is the effect. >The fact that th… |
| label | r/btc |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/btc |
| datetime | 2024-05-25 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak11MzJ1TzJDSU12eHBVa1A3bS10N3lmSXdSc2Q2S1R0ay1RQ1Jha3E2N3I2a1VMWTJVSkJwLW5GekR3WmJnRUUtck9ES3ZpZnRhMnd3MzBGM040Nm5oSnc9PQ== |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5LalBBd0tWbWgtM2tvVmJtS3N0Ym01Wlh0YUV5bDBoejM1REVDaUpGY0ZFTXhxazFVcG1OSk1RSXhDY2dlb3pQQXFfdURodE51WDBZa1NQaFdNal9oX09KZlRHZG1mcFBYcjZDNkQ1eC1qX0UwaWlZQkF1MllUNE16a1E1bVJYeUlPMlphYUxOa0t3bHZjZFpLallKTjFMX29Rc1ltdmx2YUdWcHFqR1ZISzBBOFlQcVpGYWpxRXFfcGdyemo5cjBQVEQw |
Raw Record
{
"text": ">Storing value is a use.\n\nActually, you are right. Storing value is a use. It just isn't a use that can give bitcoin a value.\n\n>There is a market for Bitcoin therfore Bitcoin has value.\n\nAs a logical statement, it is true.\n\nAs a causal statement, it is a fallacy reversing the cause and the effect. It is true that bitcoin having a value would cause a market for it to exist. Therefore, bitcoin having a value is the cause and the existence of the market for bitcoin is the effect.\n\n>The fact that the network is slow means the primary use case for Bitcoin at the present moment is as a store of value.\n\nWrong. The *store of value* use is just *secondary*. Anything used as a store value must have some *primary* use case to get value, and only then it can become a store of value - you cannot store value in something not having a value. You seem to struggle to reveal what the primary use case for bitcoin is.\n\n>improve lawyer two solutions\n\nLol. Hope you will find out what the word \"lawyer\" means.\n\n> There is probably a use case for some type of stablecoin to peg against BTC.\n\nIt certainly is possible to peg a stablecoin against BTC. However, similarly as the *store of value* use case, it is just a *secondary* use case.\n\n>To prove that Bitcoin doesn't have value you must explain...\n\nIt is not possible to prove that bitcoin does not have value, since Bitcoin does have a value. It does have a *primary* use, but the majority of people, including yourself do not know what it is.",
"label": "r/btc",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/btc",
"datetime": "2024-05-25",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak11MzJ1TzJDSU12eHBVa1A3bS10N3lmSXdSc2Q2S1R0ay1RQ1Jha3E2N3I2a1VMWTJVSkJwLW5GekR3WmJnRUUtck9ES3ZpZnRhMnd3MzBGM040Nm5oSnc9PQ==",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5LalBBd0tWbWgtM2tvVmJtS3N0Ym01Wlh0YUV5bDBoejM1REVDaUpGY0ZFTXhxazFVcG1OSk1RSXhDY2dlb3pQQXFfdURodE51WDBZa1NQaFdNal9oX09KZlRHZG1mcFBYcjZDNkQ1eC1qX0UwaWlZQkF1MllUNE16a1E1bVJYeUlPMlphYUxOa0t3bHZjZFpLallKTjFMX29Rc1ltdmx2YUdWcHFqR1ZISzBBOFlQcVpGYWpxRXFfcGdyemo5cjBQVEQw"
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 95228
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000