Row 94660

Row ID: 94660 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 94660 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Anyone around for the scaling debates from 2014-2017 remembers that Blockstream was effectively able to block onchain scaling because nobody was able to advance an onchain scaling solution that could be proven to scale up to 8B people making 10txns per day. By Tuesday.

I don't know where the requirement to support every living human making 10 txns per day by Tuesday came from. But it's ridiculous.

This is a classic strategy for detailing continuous improvement. It goes like this: does your solution provably solve every conceivable issue going forward? If not, then no improvement is allowed, because none of the suggested solutions are good enough.

I just wanted to shine a bright light on this particular angle of sabotage. Because there are definitely "members" of this community who are playing that sabotage game right now. According to these people, BCH hasn't actually solved any scaling issues, and can't claim scaling victories, because it still can't scale to 8B people making 10txns/day by Tuesday.

This line of sabotage, and the people engaging in it, need to be called out for it.

Our old friend singularity87 called this out years ago, when he said

> What someone somewhere worked out, is that all you have to do to take down a community is say that you are on their side. It is an astoundingly effective form of psychological attack.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9ch88n/remember_usingularity87s_post_regarding_the/

FieldValue
text Anyone around for the scaling debates from 2014-2017 remembers that Blockstream was effectively able to block onchain scaling because nobody was able to advance an onchain scaling solution that could be proven to scale up to 8B people making 10txns per day. By Tuesday. I don't know where the requirement to support every living human making 10 txns per day by Tuesday came from. But it's ridiculous. This is a classic strategy for detailing continuous improvement. It goes like this: does your sol…
label r/btc
dataType post
communityName r/btc
datetime 2024-05-25
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak11LV83dE1rV2lycGNpZW9WemM5YnhWeHVKalBVUU1QVnFLRjIzRGh6Q1dKZjJ4QTNqMGxDazlHeDQyUDRQYi1hNTRqNEtBWVdCREtmNWFOZ0dqN28xQkdqaDVZWExBTjVDQkU5c24wX2JZNWs9
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9fRFdMNzZIOGlWLWNzZWhCMEgyRnBjYXgtd0tkTnJacDJTaEdhOE9ZUTRmVE16TV9iRld2T0lWbXdoT1FIbWpIOXBSSzFFQ0xvYU5tUmgxbzRMSWZXMXh0aG1EYW5leUlFdHBRYlpPVWNkVVJISWlQNmJpckxTcHlyNnZMMmZvU1JYanFYVFVqYTFoLUVZWkcyRHNFamZCSUtDNWNLZ1JIbjRsaHZoN19jb0E2M21FOG1oY3Z4Z1pzbU41Z0pnUHd1

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Anyone around for the scaling debates from 2014-2017 remembers that Blockstream was effectively able to block onchain scaling because nobody was able to advance an onchain scaling solution that could be proven to scale up to 8B people making 10txns per day. By Tuesday.\n\nI don't know where the requirement to support every living human making 10 txns per day by Tuesday came from. But it's ridiculous.\n\nThis is a classic strategy for detailing continuous improvement. It goes like this: does your solution provably solve every conceivable issue going forward? If not, then no improvement is allowed, because none of the suggested solutions are good enough.\n\nI just wanted to shine a bright light on this particular angle of sabotage. Because there are definitely \"members\" of this community who are playing that sabotage game right now. According to these people, BCH hasn't actually solved any scaling issues, and can't claim scaling victories, because it still can't scale to 8B people making 10txns/day by Tuesday.\n\nThis line of sabotage, and the people engaging in it, need to be called out for it.\n\nOur old friend singularity87 called this out years ago, when he said\n\n> What someone somewhere worked out, is that all you have to do to take down a community is say that you are on their side. It is an astoundingly effective form of psychological attack.\n\nhttps://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9ch88n/remember_usingularity87s_post_regarding_the/",
  "label": "r/btc",
  "dataType": "post",
  "communityName": "r/btc",
  "datetime": "2024-05-25",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak11LV83dE1rV2lycGNpZW9WemM5YnhWeHVKalBVUU1QVnFLRjIzRGh6Q1dKZjJ4QTNqMGxDazlHeDQyUDRQYi1hNTRqNEtBWVdCREtmNWFOZ0dqN28xQkdqaDVZWExBTjVDQkU5c24wX2JZNWs9",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9fRFdMNzZIOGlWLWNzZWhCMEgyRnBjYXgtd0tkTnJacDJTaEdhOE9ZUTRmVE16TV9iRld2T0lWbXdoT1FIbWpIOXBSSzFFQ0xvYU5tUmgxbzRMSWZXMXh0aG1EYW5leUlFdHBRYlpPVWNkVVJISWlQNmJpckxTcHlyNnZMMmZvU1JYanFYVFVqYTFoLUVZWkcyRHNFamZCSUtDNWNLZ1JIbjRsaHZoN19jb0E2M21FOG1oY3Z4Z1pzbU41Z0pnUHd1"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information