Row 90769
Content Data
This page contains data entry 90769 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
> And after they perform one of these "test" explosions do they usually tweet out something like "...experienced an anomaly a few moments ago. The vapors from the anomaly caused a secondary explosion on the test stand."?
It’s not NASA or SpaceX who wrote that, but an independent source.
>Why call a routine event an anomaly if it was meant to happen?
Because the nature of that tweet was speculatory and relies on the idea that the test was not a “test to failure” which is common in the launch industry regardless of what company you are discussing. (Even NASA does this)
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | > And after they perform one of these "test" explosions do they usually tweet out something like "...experienced an anomaly a few moments ago. The vapors from the anomaly caused a secondary explosion on the test stand."? It’s not NASA or SpaceX who wrote that, but an independent source. >Why call a routine event an anomaly if it was meant to happen? Because the nature of that tweet was speculatory and relies on the idea that the test was not a “test to failure” which is common in the launch … |
| label | r/technology |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/technology |
| datetime | 2024-05-25 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1ya05SWDZBbjc4V2Q5c29YMEVRM3FTTVY0aTVITTdGRlhLeHo1YldTcUc5VGoyVURrRkxBSFRUTndKa0NwalNhTGRhN3dINGktNmFIb2p2c3F2TjlqZEJFUGVDX25UbTJJVVhxLWdveWhqQ1E9 |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak85eHRoOFFsSExJMnVjYVIyQ1p0MmU3bno5WTBBRmhDZk5Wd01IZ01CdTB1SEJOZG9selpzY21qeDFlc0FZMm8tRmhKMjNKZEZKcGlqQlkwdzRrUzJVT0xhUlc2RHRBRHRmN3RRTHpRSjBEa1JxaGNVaDlWblNNV2tjUEppNlBUaGwwZ3JLZ0VoSGpCU2U0cGE2enRQUkJlUms2TmUxWmZKMVhfYlUyYm1PS2NtQWhYdEVVMGdOYnRsV0Nrb2stZndtTjV4SVNpNURmYmhYRUVvd25aTWVidz09 |
Raw Record
{
"text": "> And after they perform one of these \"test\" explosions do they usually tweet out something like \"...experienced an anomaly a few moments ago. The vapors from the anomaly caused a secondary explosion on the test stand.\"? \n\nIt’s not NASA or SpaceX who wrote that, but an independent source.\n\n>Why call a routine event an anomaly if it was meant to happen?\n\nBecause the nature of that tweet was speculatory and relies on the idea that the test was not a “test to failure” which is common in the launch industry regardless of what company you are discussing. (Even NASA does this)",
"label": "r/technology",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/technology",
"datetime": "2024-05-25",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1ya05SWDZBbjc4V2Q5c29YMEVRM3FTTVY0aTVITTdGRlhLeHo1YldTcUc5VGoyVURrRkxBSFRUTndKa0NwalNhTGRhN3dINGktNmFIb2p2c3F2TjlqZEJFUGVDX25UbTJJVVhxLWdveWhqQ1E9",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak85eHRoOFFsSExJMnVjYVIyQ1p0MmU3bno5WTBBRmhDZk5Wd01IZ01CdTB1SEJOZG9selpzY21qeDFlc0FZMm8tRmhKMjNKZEZKcGlqQlkwdzRrUzJVT0xhUlc2RHRBRHRmN3RRTHpRSjBEa1JxaGNVaDlWblNNV2tjUEppNlBUaGwwZ3JLZ0VoSGpCU2U0cGE2enRQUkJlUms2TmUxWmZKMVhfYlUyYm1PS2NtQWhYdEVVMGdOYnRsV0Nrb2stZndtTjV4SVNpNURmYmhYRUVvd25aTWVidz09"
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 90769
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000