Row 89174

Row ID: 89174 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 89174 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

> A fair market requires everyone having a FAIR chance. Not having any plausible way to even know something exists yet when a huge portion of it is already being claimed, is not having a fair chance in it. So not a fair market.

This is incorrect as a requirement and an impossible standard.

Free and fair market is that anyone can participate and no one can acquire coins in a way that is unavailable to other participants.

Giving yourself free coins when other's could not give themselves free coins is not a free and fair market.

Mining coins after announcing the start of bitcoin and only mining when anyone else in the world can is a free and fair market.

> When nobody knows about it or had any plausible chance TO know about it, then it was not "publicly available"

Satoshi only mined when it was publicly available.

> If I make a website but then don't tell anyone the address, it's not "public" in any sane person's mind.

It's a good thing Satoshi didn't do this.

> Even aside from anything else we've been talking about, like no matter which side of the above conversation you're on, none of this has anything to do with decentralization either way.

It absolutely does. Especially with proof of stake.

>Satoshi objectively has a massive portion of coins

Doesn't matter if he got them in an free and fair market just like anybody could.

> vitalik holds 0.2% of ETH, and the ethereum foudnation about 0.3%.

That is insane they got those for free. It's a shame really.

> Satoshi has 5% of BTC.

First, doesn't matter if he got them in an free and fair market just like anybody could.

Second, prove it.

(Patoshi miner is not proven if that's what you are talking about. But even if it was, it wouldn't matter.)

FieldValue
text > A fair market requires everyone having a FAIR chance. Not having any plausible way to even know something exists yet when a huge portion of it is already being claimed, is not having a fair chance in it. So not a fair market. This is incorrect as a requirement and an impossible standard. Free and fair market is that anyone can participate and no one can acquire coins in a way that is unavailable to other participants. Giving yourself free coins when other's could not give themselves free co…
label r/cryptocurrency
dataType comment
communityName r/CryptoCurrency
datetime 2024-05-25
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1xSU52Z1ZzcFZIYlNSalZFTS1MX00zZFpkeU1vRzhSbzJKMXM4eFdOSjl6VnNWNE83TDNTSEZHV1NVRzcxUmVvLTRRUDYxazFDeHpRcWQ3czlWUzNudlE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak84ZFFDYU9vcGJtSTFGQ24ySDVjOUtjQVlWSFVYanU2b3dwNVI1bUljVng3N0dMNDJBRXByUU4zV2VEQ0R4eDFfbnlhMGZ1SElOX3dqemZMUWFSR2RwSE04OEFBcExfYzkzUDhWSDl4RmFVdW41OF9FeVRrWFRZcXE1b2ZtMnI0V0hMdXJraW1LU3BPTTZzT1d1RGJJN0dLNWk0bFdfQV83ZkpRVlpwUm1TaFhuMGJkWXpkUExUWDZ0c1lpaFkwOXg1M0Y5V2ZXWmYwQl80ZllYU3FEdnVqQT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "> A fair market requires everyone having a FAIR chance. Not having any plausible way to even know something exists yet when a huge portion of it is already being claimed, is not having a fair chance in it. So not a fair market.\n\nThis is incorrect as a requirement and an impossible standard.\n\nFree and fair market is that anyone can participate and no one can acquire coins in a way that is unavailable to other participants.\n\nGiving yourself free coins when other's could not give themselves free coins is not a free and fair market.\n\nMining coins after announcing the start of bitcoin and only mining when anyone else in the world can is a free and fair market.\n\n> When nobody knows about it or had any plausible chance TO know about it, then it was not \"publicly available\"\n\nSatoshi only mined when it was publicly available.  \n\n> If I make a website but then don't tell anyone the address, it's not \"public\" in any sane person's mind.\n\nIt's a good thing Satoshi didn't do this.\n\n> Even aside from anything else we've been talking about, like no matter which side of the above conversation you're on, none of this has anything to do with decentralization either way.\n\nIt absolutely does.  Especially with proof of stake.\n\n>Satoshi objectively has a massive portion of coins\n\nDoesn't matter if he got them in an free and fair market just like anybody could.\n\n> vitalik holds 0.2% of ETH, and the ethereum foudnation about 0.3%. \n\nThat is insane they got those for free.  It's a shame really.\n\n> Satoshi has 5% of BTC.\n\nFirst, doesn't matter if he got them in an free and fair market just like anybody could.\n\nSecond, prove it.  \n\n(Patoshi miner is not proven if that's what you are talking about.  But even if it was, it wouldn't matter.)",
  "label": "r/cryptocurrency",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/CryptoCurrency",
  "datetime": "2024-05-25",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1xSU52Z1ZzcFZIYlNSalZFTS1MX00zZFpkeU1vRzhSbzJKMXM4eFdOSjl6VnNWNE83TDNTSEZHV1NVRzcxUmVvLTRRUDYxazFDeHpRcWQ3czlWUzNudlE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak84ZFFDYU9vcGJtSTFGQ24ySDVjOUtjQVlWSFVYanU2b3dwNVI1bUljVng3N0dMNDJBRXByUU4zV2VEQ0R4eDFfbnlhMGZ1SElOX3dqemZMUWFSR2RwSE04OEFBcExfYzkzUDhWSDl4RmFVdW41OF9FeVRrWFRZcXE1b2ZtMnI0V0hMdXJraW1LU3BPTTZzT1d1RGJJN0dLNWk0bFdfQV83ZkpRVlpwUm1TaFhuMGJkWXpkUExUWDZ0c1lpaFkwOXg1M0Y5V2ZXWmYwQl80ZllYU3FEdnVqQT09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information