Row 86799
Content Data
This page contains data entry 86799 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
I’m aware that creating generative applications is a bit different; but the actress was coached on this before she consented; then, after that, she consented. To allow people explicitly to make her voice say ~arbitrary things.
The fact that people might confuse them IMHO has little bearing here? Some people think she sounds kinda like the VA she was brought on to replace. But: so what? If I want a McLaren for a shot but they don’t want to have their product used in that way, I might still reach out to Ferrari even *if* there’s a reasonable chance that a layperson might literally not know the difference between a McLaren and a Ferrari or be able to tell them apart.
If that’s too pie-in-the-sky (is that what that expression means?), how about; what if I needed a classic muscle car, instead? *I* can’t tell the difference between many classic muscle cars, and ~no one who isn’t an enthusiast should be expected to reliably do that. Still, Ford doesn’t have a case against me (the studio) for using a 68’ Camaro that audiences mistake for a Mustang.
And maybe they did originally want Johansson for her credits; but that still doesn’t/shouldn’t mean that if she declines, they just don’t get to fill that role. By hiring a different person. That some laypeople say sounds similar.
Like, imagine an analogous situation in any other domain. You wanted photoshop but Adobe said no? Guess you just don’t get to edit images anymore, otherwise people might mistakenly think you used Photoshop, which you’re not allowed to.
That just can’t be how things work.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | I’m aware that creating generative applications is a bit different; but the actress was coached on this before she consented; then, after that, she consented. To allow people explicitly to make her voice say ~arbitrary things. The fact that people might confuse them IMHO has little bearing here? Some people think she sounds kinda like the VA she was brought on to replace. But: so what? If I want a McLaren for a shot but they don’t want to have their product used in that way, I might still r… |
| label | r/chatgpt |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/ChatGPT |
| datetime | 2024-05-24 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1wNDc3M3p0MGtVdjF5VUNjOWFiSHZxNzNRUXFVT21SWDJCbmJtLU50alhaWi11czUtTWFILS1TQnJXZ1NTdU1vLW5MWDljNXF6TndraWNwY3YzbVRFMUE9PQ== |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak82NF96NGd3OWFDRUlYV2s4dTVWSFJuUVJsX3laX2VkYTBONUF0OERPRmVpVEg5dVpySGRsb1Q3cHBCUERWRFg0d3B3dlZ3ZFZHODN1NlczNTd2anEyWk9hY2kwTE95SFNOTUpNRjlmQ3BYeVVXMU5HdzQwWXpOaWJtMFoyUmpmWnQxNDVtQzY0c0pLSk1LdU0zb25Ba1FYQjV3ME5fbFUwdXBBZ3FNNzR5NnlBPQ== |
Raw Record
{
"text": "I’m aware that creating generative applications is a bit different; but the actress was coached on this before she consented; then, after that, she consented. To allow people explicitly to make her voice say ~arbitrary things.\n\nThe fact that people might confuse them IMHO has little bearing here? Some people think she sounds kinda like the VA she was brought on to replace. But: so what? If I want a McLaren for a shot but they don’t want to have their product used in that way, I might still reach out to Ferrari even *if* there’s a reasonable chance that a layperson might literally not know the difference between a McLaren and a Ferrari or be able to tell them apart.\n\nIf that’s too pie-in-the-sky (is that what that expression means?), how about; what if I needed a classic muscle car, instead? *I* can’t tell the difference between many classic muscle cars, and ~no one who isn’t an enthusiast should be expected to reliably do that. Still, Ford doesn’t have a case against me (the studio) for using a 68’ Camaro that audiences mistake for a Mustang.\n\nAnd maybe they did originally want Johansson for her credits; but that still doesn’t/shouldn’t mean that if she declines, they just don’t get to fill that role. By hiring a different person. That some laypeople say sounds similar.\n\nLike, imagine an analogous situation in any other domain. You wanted photoshop but Adobe said no? Guess you just don’t get to edit images anymore, otherwise people might mistakenly think you used Photoshop, which you’re not allowed to.\n\nThat just can’t be how things work.",
"label": "r/chatgpt",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/ChatGPT",
"datetime": "2024-05-24",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1wNDc3M3p0MGtVdjF5VUNjOWFiSHZxNzNRUXFVT21SWDJCbmJtLU50alhaWi11czUtTWFILS1TQnJXZ1NTdU1vLW5MWDljNXF6TndraWNwY3YzbVRFMUE9PQ==",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak82NF96NGd3OWFDRUlYV2s4dTVWSFJuUVJsX3laX2VkYTBONUF0OERPRmVpVEg5dVpySGRsb1Q3cHBCUERWRFg0d3B3dlZ3ZFZHODN1NlczNTd2anEyWk9hY2kwTE95SFNOTUpNRjlmQ3BYeVVXMU5HdzQwWXpOaWJtMFoyUmpmWnQxNDVtQzY0c0pLSk1LdU0zb25Ba1FYQjV3ME5fbFUwdXBBZ3FNNzR5NnlBPQ=="
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 86799
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000