Row 86710

Row ID: 86710 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 86710 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

They haven't figured out that pornography isn't speech, though? When the Fifth Circuit upheld a similar law they didn't do so because pornography wasn't speech, but because that speech was permissible to restrict to children. From the court's opinion:

> Ginsberg’s central holding—that regulation of the distribution to minors of **speech** obscene for minors is subject only to rational-basis review— is good law and binds this court today.

Pornography is still speech - it is just a kind of speech that can be restricted (if you ignore a line of Supreme Court precedents, of course)

FieldValue
text They haven't figured out that pornography isn't speech, though? When the Fifth Circuit upheld a similar law they didn't do so because pornography wasn't speech, but because that speech was permissible to restrict to children. From the court's opinion: > Ginsberg’s central holding—that regulation of the distribution to minors of **speech** obscene for minors is subject only to rational-basis review— is good law and binds this court today. Pornography is still speech - it is just a kind of spe…
label r/technology
dataType comment
communityName r/technology
datetime 2024-05-24
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1wWXBLcHVZUVVZN3RPYXBsVlFMdHJDd1hSdDZJaV8yS0Zkd0N5dkdvRzNsc01QZ1RFdV9GeUlxOWQ5ek1kNXBDVG1SOVBtVkZaN2NlWlJOQUV5MHRCUEE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak82cGF3THVZdWVxX1ZGVHFHMGJfaDZ4YkdiOThzZEJLd2twRnZhdW92Zm1pSlRoaV9yYnpTbG9wSFVSVHBMWjdvY2Q1RmFXbXVDODdRRU1neGIzVU1yclFISkZBTFdlTWVhTkxRQ0oyQVBsZXlCUEwwMlctbk8ycktYQTN4cWFTaUNJTUk0NHBVZ0xuRFdWVWc4RDJwQVlNWnJFOThBZU9kdTdWN1ItSHc0YU9veG5zaDZUUGxOUm9jaDliSXVsMmY3UDhmb0VXNEJZMmctcjhEWkZoSGc1Zz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "They haven't figured out that pornography isn't speech, though?  \nWhen the Fifth Circuit upheld a similar law they didn't do so because pornography wasn't speech, but because that speech was permissible to restrict to children. From the court's opinion:\n\n> Ginsberg’s central holding—that regulation of the distribution to\nminors of **speech** obscene for minors is subject only to rational-basis review—\nis good law and binds this court today.\n\nPornography is still speech - it is just a kind of speech that can be restricted (if you ignore a line of Supreme Court precedents, of course)",
  "label": "r/technology",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/technology",
  "datetime": "2024-05-24",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1wWXBLcHVZUVVZN3RPYXBsVlFMdHJDd1hSdDZJaV8yS0Zkd0N5dkdvRzNsc01QZ1RFdV9GeUlxOWQ5ek1kNXBDVG1SOVBtVkZaN2NlWlJOQUV5MHRCUEE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak82cGF3THVZdWVxX1ZGVHFHMGJfaDZ4YkdiOThzZEJLd2twRnZhdW92Zm1pSlRoaV9yYnpTbG9wSFVSVHBMWjdvY2Q1RmFXbXVDODdRRU1neGIzVU1yclFISkZBTFdlTWVhTkxRQ0oyQVBsZXlCUEwwMlctbk8ycktYQTN4cWFTaUNJTUk0NHBVZ0xuRFdWVWc4RDJwQVlNWnJFOThBZU9kdTdWN1ItSHc0YU9veG5zaDZUUGxOUm9jaDliSXVsMmY3UDhmb0VXNEJZMmctcjhEWkZoSGc1Zz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information