Row 86609
Content Data
This page contains data entry 86609 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
> I'm saying if you think this is so effective, why not apply it to other age restricted goods like movies, spray paint, and M-rated videogames? Why don't we need to verify our age to buy those online? > >
Who said we shouldn't need to. I think there's a strong case to be made for requiring age verification there too, if the law actually intends to restrict minors for accessing that stuff. Many of the cases you mentioned aren't actually legally required, businesses just choose to ban minors. But still, maybe we *should* enact age verification there too. You make a good point.
>That's not an excuse to do nothing, but it's worth considering exactly how effective legislation like this will be in actually reducing access for minors.
And what do we do with that consideration? Age restricting alcohol vapes and porn do actually make it harder for young people to get that stuff. Not impossible, but definitely harder, and that's the point. Like you said, not being 100% effective is " not an excuse to do nothing".
>It's also worth understanding that porn is in a unique position where knowledge of who is consuming what is sensitive information. Do you think the concerns of that info leaking are unwarranted?
In many cases, yes. With how verification works in most cases, information on viewing habits can't be leaked since no one would actually know what you are watching.
>And what does this law actually solve when anyone is a free VPN service away from accessing it anyway?
Like you said, a law not being 100% effective does not mean its not worth doing. People will still find a way to get automatic weapons and bombs. Should we just make those legal?
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | > I'm saying if you think this is so effective, why not apply it to other age restricted goods like movies, spray paint, and M-rated videogames? Why don't we need to verify our age to buy those online? > > Who said we shouldn't need to. I think there's a strong case to be made for requiring age verification there too, if the law actually intends to restrict minors for accessing that stuff. Many of the cases you mentioned aren't actually legally required, businesses just choose to ban minors. … |
| label | r/technology |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/technology |
| datetime | 2024-05-24 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1wa1MydlJ3eDU5XzRsU0kwYkhCeDNVN2pHY3pUTDBUOVpwTEUxakFxZC1namwzeTZ5SnJ5bkxvMUxQVFRRZ0RXdGxEZkp4aHBCQnBSQ3lwUGJBSm1xT1BRblBMaWhCTVFuTEhOSElhWmo0TFk9 |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak82YmUyMTNXbEgxWUdCbFR3UHF6aXRNRlZDQXVJM0ZHaGttMnRObWRWaHlyT0RrTk9GYThCc0VrYnRTbkhUXzZfYmt0ODctbTBtSy1wOV82TzRTNVlMREl4ckNhZnY4c0pja3Q3VEp4aTUwYm9yVUV1NmRjNnJIODJBaTVDQVYzcm1RN1RPOEhjYm9Mdm13cllMU0lzUmtleTdBbWZWYk11eGN5OUtCaUhJb2VUN1daTGFQcDBoYk1NN0lEZnR1TExoZEtLNmFJSF80VVJhNFZMcmN6cXJsUT09 |
Raw Record
{
"text": "> I'm saying if you think this is so effective, why not apply it to other age restricted goods like movies, spray paint, and M-rated videogames? Why don't we need to verify our age to buy those online?\n> \n> \n\nWho said we shouldn't need to. I think there's a strong case to be made for requiring age verification there too, if the law actually intends to restrict minors for accessing that stuff. Many of the cases you mentioned aren't actually legally required, businesses just choose to ban minors. But still, maybe we *should* enact age verification there too. You make a good point. \n\n>That's not an excuse to do nothing, but it's worth considering exactly how effective legislation like this will be in actually reducing access for minors.\n\nAnd what do we do with that consideration? Age restricting alcohol vapes and porn do actually make it harder for young people to get that stuff. Not impossible, but definitely harder, and that's the point. Like you said, not being 100% effective is \" not an excuse to do nothing\".\n\n>It's also worth understanding that porn is in a unique position where knowledge of who is consuming what is sensitive information. Do you think the concerns of that info leaking are unwarranted? \n\nIn many cases, yes. With how verification works in most cases, information on viewing habits can't be leaked since no one would actually know what you are watching.\n\n>And what does this law actually solve when anyone is a free VPN service away from accessing it anyway?\n\nLike you said, a law not being 100% effective does not mean its not worth doing. People will still find a way to get automatic weapons and bombs. Should we just make those legal?",
"label": "r/technology",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/technology",
"datetime": "2024-05-24",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1wa1MydlJ3eDU5XzRsU0kwYkhCeDNVN2pHY3pUTDBUOVpwTEUxakFxZC1namwzeTZ5SnJ5bkxvMUxQVFRRZ0RXdGxEZkp4aHBCQnBSQ3lwUGJBSm1xT1BRblBMaWhCTVFuTEhOSElhWmo0TFk9",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak82YmUyMTNXbEgxWUdCbFR3UHF6aXRNRlZDQXVJM0ZHaGttMnRObWRWaHlyT0RrTk9GYThCc0VrYnRTbkhUXzZfYmt0ODctbTBtSy1wOV82TzRTNVlMREl4ckNhZnY4c0pja3Q3VEp4aTUwYm9yVUV1NmRjNnJIODJBaTVDQVYzcm1RN1RPOEhjYm9Mdm13cllMU0lzUmtleTdBbWZWYk11eGN5OUtCaUhJb2VUN1daTGFQcDBoYk1NN0lEZnR1TExoZEtLNmFJSF80VVJhNFZMcmN6cXJsUT09"
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 86609
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000