Row 84516

Row ID: 84516 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 84516 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

>Comparing L1 performance, without discussing the centralization of consensus, centralization of development, and overall security model is entirely useless.

Of course, 100% agree, no brainer. But how would you pack that week long discussion into less than 60 seconds?? The ad was a funny poke at the fact that Algorand provably and demonstrably runs circles around the depicted competitors ranked in the top 10 by MC. By the way, ALGO consensus is 100% decentralized and that's irrefutable and not argued by anyone in honest conversation. Centralization aspect lies solely with the relays and original tokenomics.

And yeah, there should be serious honest & objective compare and contrast discussion about tech, top to bottom. You probably don't realize how overlooked or purposely excluded Algorand is by competitors or "journalists" with their cherry picked misleading data. Algorand is effectively saying HEY LOOK OVER HERE, and rightly so. It has some of the very best tech in the game but gets ignored or dogged in favor of shit that doesn't work well but has a shit ton more liquidity.

>L1 scaling, which is complete nonsense.

Fine, harp on scaling, but guess what? Algorand has proven to not break a sweat with more valid sustained tps than all three of those chains. It's not speculation or theoretical, it's proven. (And that proof/load testing was initiated entirely by a community member/dev using donated ALGO for the tx fees.) I'm not sure why you can't applaud advancement in blockchain. We should exhaust the L1 before relying on L2s, and ALGO is certainly one of the strongest L1s and undeniably more solid than BTC/ETH/SOL.

At any rate, please satisfy your skepticism by researching Algorand yourself. Start with Silvio Micali and work forward to today and the 2024 road map.

FieldValue
text >Comparing L1 performance, without discussing the centralization of consensus, centralization of development, and overall security model is entirely useless. Of course, 100% agree, no brainer. But how would you pack that week long discussion into less than 60 seconds?? The ad was a funny poke at the fact that Algorand provably and demonstrably runs circles around the depicted competitors ranked in the top 10 by MC. By the way, ALGO consensus is 100% decentralized and that's irrefutable and not…
label r/cryptocurrency
dataType comment
communityName r/CryptoCurrency
datetime 2024-05-24
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1ueVc2U1NTSXdUMTB0bkdMaUxHMmFsaDNVYlNBUUhNbk55YlNQNFIzSzJ6UkRJdHJvRkx4UDdTVU4zZUVPWmNidlJZU3B6X3lzYXQ5SWtYdEFTTUthdlE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak80TmpGNC15WGZTRXFtTFh4VDhnc3dmZ0EyV3VCZjFVaFhjX1VuVGMwZEVqZ09QZDU5Z28yWGtFNmRqNzByb0dHbGFyU0J6VXJPS3ZKU1RRaWk1S2ZpaTRZVzNjd09nTXItVHFzVVdBTzV3WXN4ZERLLXVRRzJ0SFZyazJXclllVlBDSmZOTmpnbEh2REs4RjloOFF0ODZMclBHLUE5ZGRvU2lwejQyeDZDS0VXYVBmMW1wY2dETnplSHZTSG5QdXBhQl85Q1ctYzhvX0o3cWxOVkZjemV6QT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": ">Comparing L1 performance, without discussing the centralization of consensus, centralization of development, and overall security model is entirely useless.\n\nOf course, 100% agree, no brainer. But how would you pack that week long discussion into less than 60 seconds??  The ad was a funny poke at the fact that Algorand provably and demonstrably runs circles around the depicted competitors ranked in the top 10 by MC. By the way, ALGO consensus is 100% decentralized and that's irrefutable and not argued by anyone in honest conversation. Centralization aspect lies solely with the relays and original tokenomics.\n\nAnd yeah, there should be serious honest & objective compare and contrast discussion about tech, top to bottom.  You probably don't realize how overlooked or purposely excluded Algorand is by competitors or \"journalists\" with their cherry picked misleading data.  Algorand is effectively saying HEY LOOK OVER HERE, and rightly so.  It has some of the very best tech in the game but gets ignored or dogged in favor of shit that doesn't work well but has a shit ton more liquidity.\n\n>L1 scaling, which is complete nonsense.\n\nFine, harp on scaling, but guess what? Algorand has proven to not break a sweat with more valid sustained tps than all three of those chains. It's not speculation or theoretical, it's proven.  (And that proof/load testing was initiated entirely by a community member/dev using donated ALGO for the tx fees.)  I'm not sure why you can't applaud advancement in blockchain.  We should exhaust the L1 before relying on L2s, and ALGO is certainly one of the strongest L1s and undeniably more solid than BTC/ETH/SOL.\n\nAt any rate, please satisfy your skepticism by researching Algorand yourself. Start with Silvio Micali and work forward to today and the 2024 road map.",
  "label": "r/cryptocurrency",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/CryptoCurrency",
  "datetime": "2024-05-24",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1ueVc2U1NTSXdUMTB0bkdMaUxHMmFsaDNVYlNBUUhNbk55YlNQNFIzSzJ6UkRJdHJvRkx4UDdTVU4zZUVPWmNidlJZU3B6X3lzYXQ5SWtYdEFTTUthdlE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak80TmpGNC15WGZTRXFtTFh4VDhnc3dmZ0EyV3VCZjFVaFhjX1VuVGMwZEVqZ09QZDU5Z28yWGtFNmRqNzByb0dHbGFyU0J6VXJPS3ZKU1RRaWk1S2ZpaTRZVzNjd09nTXItVHFzVVdBTzV3WXN4ZERLLXVRRzJ0SFZyazJXclllVlBDSmZOTmpnbEh2REs4RjloOFF0ODZMclBHLUE5ZGRvU2lwejQyeDZDS0VXYVBmMW1wY2dETnplSHZTSG5QdXBhQl85Q1ctYzhvX0o3cWxOVkZjemV6QT09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information