Row 82142

Row ID: 82142 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 82142 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

I think we agree there should be some protections in place for what you are describing, but I think where we might differ is the point of demarcation. I'd say the point where liability should step in is when a company puts content in front of someone that the person didn't select or choose to follow in someway. The protections should last if it is something a user selects to see the content, whereas a "suggested for you" page should have to pass a higher level of scrutiny because that's when a company is making choices for their users.

To take your analogy further a company should not be responsible in that situation for what happens in a parking lot where people select their own spot and are free to come and go. But in a situation where a company takes your car and selects where to put it, and it comes back with a bunch of drugs in the back you might want to take some legal action in civil court against them and I don't think the case would be tossed out before trial even started, but that is what internet companies do now thanks to section 230.

FieldValue
text I think we agree there should be some protections in place for what you are describing, but I think where we might differ is the point of demarcation. I'd say the point where liability should step in is when a company puts content in front of someone that the person didn't select or choose to follow in someway. The protections should last if it is something a user selects to see the content, whereas a "suggested for you" page should have to pass a higher level of scrutiny because that's when a c…
label r/technology
dataType comment
communityName r/technology
datetime 2024-05-24
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1tVTZhd2tNWEd1WWswWGJDTlpEWkVoYkRZQVZtdkttenMzaE1ET3hNeWFQaDdvVkxfZ18zX1AxLXlPaC03a1JpMFp5MFJmOXJPYWhXV1ZNNnZ2YnFZV1E9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak8zemRsYkowaTRjTlQ4Q3l1aE9KUTBvUjB3S0F0cW1xUmdOM1NjN0RZbmR1WXlkTVlna3ZsWWxmZm1veFFKUWQ4aWRFdUE3dHV3VnJUVVh5N185UUREc1ZWdzZ4U1BKa3VYYTZCRlRxYmZMU0xsMXpaT25yS2YydkIzdTNQZ1dWV29YM013SHo2b2ZvTllJc2lSTHFMUkVBdk9hYS1HZkxpUkxMTVpVVmdkYzRKeTNEbmRhNEdtUktvSjB2LTJmdy1LVEtfLXcxY04xX1RxcVRQVDhHd0lCUT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "I think we agree there should be some protections in place for what you are describing, but I think where we might differ is the point of demarcation. I'd say the point where liability should step in is when a company puts content in front of someone that the person didn't select or choose to follow in someway. The protections should last if it is something a user selects to see the content, whereas a \"suggested for you\" page should have to pass a higher level of scrutiny because that's when a company is making choices for their users. \n\nTo take your analogy further a company should not be responsible in that situation for what happens in a parking lot where people select their own spot and are free to come and go. But in a situation where a company takes your car and selects where to put it, and it comes back with a bunch of drugs in the back you might want to take some legal action in civil court against them and I don't think the case would be tossed out before trial even started, but that is what internet companies do now thanks to section 230.",
  "label": "r/technology",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/technology",
  "datetime": "2024-05-24",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1tVTZhd2tNWEd1WWswWGJDTlpEWkVoYkRZQVZtdkttenMzaE1ET3hNeWFQaDdvVkxfZ18zX1AxLXlPaC03a1JpMFp5MFJmOXJPYWhXV1ZNNnZ2YnFZV1E9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak8zemRsYkowaTRjTlQ4Q3l1aE9KUTBvUjB3S0F0cW1xUmdOM1NjN0RZbmR1WXlkTVlna3ZsWWxmZm1veFFKUWQ4aWRFdUE3dHV3VnJUVVh5N185UUREc1ZWdzZ4U1BKa3VYYTZCRlRxYmZMU0xsMXpaT25yS2YydkIzdTNQZ1dWV29YM013SHo2b2ZvTllJc2lSTHFMUkVBdk9hYS1HZkxpUkxMTVpVVmdkYzRKeTNEbmRhNEdtUktvSjB2LTJmdy1LVEtfLXcxY04xX1RxcVRQVDhHd0lCUT09"
}

Entry Information