Row 80873

Row ID: 80873 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 80873 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Lol what? I’m not saying somebody has to be an asset because only an asset would allow their program to be broadcast ina foreign nation. I specifically was speaking about Russia, you don’t have to generalize my point so far that you then prove your own claim right.

And nowhere did I say tucker purposely makes his show an asset so that it can be used in russia. Tf are you on? I said tuckers wild ideas and crazy conspiracies lines up with narratives that russia pushes, hence why they choose to air him, rather than my example of jon Stewart (who I chose as an example for him being so far opposite to tucker, and also disprove the false claim by you that 4/5 celebs face the same practice by Russia). And I implied it should be concerning IF you agree with nutjob tucker if you see his words being shared and supported by a nation that is quite literally a dictatorship, and upholds many values that America is against.

A logical fallacy can be disproven easily by reason. Your claim that I said tucker in this case is making his show an asset to be spread in russia is so random and beside my point it’s impressive. I am mentioning why Russia choses to air tucker over Stewart for example. When I quite literally mention an example of someone’s show that isn’t used as an asset, don’t you think that would disprove any insinuation that I think shows and celebs are creating assets to be used like that? If you understood a logical fallacy you’d realize your response was closer to the definition of one than mine was lol. Wtf.

FieldValue
text Lol what? I’m not saying somebody has to be an asset because only an asset would allow their program to be broadcast ina foreign nation. I specifically was speaking about Russia, you don’t have to generalize my point so far that you then prove your own claim right. And nowhere did I say tucker purposely makes his show an asset so that it can be used in russia. Tf are you on? I said tuckers wild ideas and crazy conspiracies lines up with narratives that russia pushes, hence why they choose to a…
label r/technology
dataType comment
communityName r/technology
datetime 2024-05-24
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1sMzBmbmtPTHN4ei1EOTBESEpJNEVEYlJ5UHBmcWkxV1FZVTVyWkg1dTJUQkNzcHJwVEx6UnhLak0wT2gzMm1JSUhMOXlSek1CQnBlTlhHU1Q0U1BBZWV1OUdhamJjUExhQ0RPbkN4YjNiUU09
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak8yU3FUSVA2MkotcXZWMVpZeDlfanYwWTdCQ0dtMXlubDNXbGJhSjdHTmZxSFZRU0IybzlnTHlyZTNMTzAybmwwaElpM2xlRW9Cdnc4SFROaVBfbU9uUmlEWXFBcmRWVXNHOUUwVGhqNEd3OW0zVVhZalFXSXJGU0pyV0sxUjlPNWNuSnVhdlBkY2dSTHl2cVc5ZXNIX2lQWVB1N0xYajdHN1NQZXBTbElJb2ZpX1o4MWFhcEd2QU51bmpzZ3NrR21ORGNjX3RMLUVrZFUtalpMaVNPM3RHdz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Lol what? I’m not saying somebody has to be an asset because only an asset would allow their program to be broadcast ina foreign nation. I specifically was speaking about Russia, you don’t have to generalize my point so far that you then prove your own claim right. \n\nAnd nowhere did I say tucker purposely makes his show an asset so that it can be used in russia. Tf are you on? I said tuckers wild ideas and crazy conspiracies lines up with narratives that russia pushes, hence why they choose to air him, rather than my example of jon Stewart (who I chose as an example for him being so far opposite to tucker, and also disprove the false claim by you that 4/5 celebs face the same practice by Russia). And I implied it should be concerning IF you agree with nutjob tucker if you see his words being shared and supported by a nation that is quite literally a dictatorship, and upholds many values that America is against. \n\nA logical fallacy can be disproven easily by reason. Your claim that I said tucker in this case is making his show an asset to be spread in russia is so random and beside my point it’s impressive. I am mentioning why Russia choses to air tucker over Stewart for example. When I quite literally mention an example of someone’s show that isn’t used as an asset, don’t you think that would disprove any insinuation that I think shows and celebs are creating assets to be used like that? If you understood a logical fallacy you’d realize your response was closer to the definition of one than mine was lol. Wtf.",
  "label": "r/technology",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/technology",
  "datetime": "2024-05-24",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1sMzBmbmtPTHN4ei1EOTBESEpJNEVEYlJ5UHBmcWkxV1FZVTVyWkg1dTJUQkNzcHJwVEx6UnhLak0wT2gzMm1JSUhMOXlSek1CQnBlTlhHU1Q0U1BBZWV1OUdhamJjUExhQ0RPbkN4YjNiUU09",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak8yU3FUSVA2MkotcXZWMVpZeDlfanYwWTdCQ0dtMXlubDNXbGJhSjdHTmZxSFZRU0IybzlnTHlyZTNMTzAybmwwaElpM2xlRW9Cdnc4SFROaVBfbU9uUmlEWXFBcmRWVXNHOUUwVGhqNEd3OW0zVVhZalFXSXJGU0pyV0sxUjlPNWNuSnVhdlBkY2dSTHl2cVc5ZXNIX2lQWVB1N0xYajdHN1NQZXBTbElJb2ZpX1o4MWFhcEd2QU51bmpzZ3NrR21ORGNjX3RMLUVrZFUtalpMaVNPM3RHdz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information