Row 78253

Row ID: 78253 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 78253 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

The Trump Campaign had opportunity to put on an evidentiary hearing in front of a Trump appointed Federal judge in Wisconsin in December of 2020. The morning of hearing Trump's Campaign lawyers chickened out and stipulated to a set of facts because they just wanted argue that recent voting rule changes were unconstitutional. Why did they chicken out? Because they knew their "evidence" of fraud was bullshit and they weren't going to risk their bar licenses for Trumps lies.

>Judge Ludwig denied the state’s claims that the campaign lacked standing. Instead, he gave the campaign the hearing they asked for — the opportunity to call witnesses and submit damning exhibits. Yet, when it got down to brass tacks, the morning of the hearing, it turned out there was no actual disagreement between the Trump team and Wisconsin officials about the pertinent facts of the case. The president’s counsel basically said: Never mind, we don’t need to present all our proof . . . we’ll just stipulate to all the relevant facts and argue legal principles.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/12/a-stunning-passage-from-the-latest-court-rejection-of-team-trump/

FieldValue
text The Trump Campaign had opportunity to put on an evidentiary hearing in front of a Trump appointed Federal judge in Wisconsin in December of 2020. The morning of hearing Trump's Campaign lawyers chickened out and stipulated to a set of facts because they just wanted argue that recent voting rule changes were unconstitutional. Why did they chicken out? Because they knew their "evidence" of fraud was bullshit and they weren't going to risk their bar licenses for Trumps lies. >Judge Ludwig denie…
label r/politics
dataType comment
communityName r/politics
datetime 2024-05-24
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1qT1paRVpiczBXc1BENmJ3dHVvb0JkNUN0VUdZdzhCLThVbU5uTExELVlOZE0tUzBCdTRfLTJnR3FZUElCaWFYQl9nME9fei1yOWd4c1ItX1NnSlgta1E9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak8wYlY4OEZnR1dpc01FOWlINlpnTTZlOUZiOWR3Y2ZoTnduMkZKd2tXdmtDQ0FUNUkzNFNSLXJuRm1rWGVRZTBZdkRtYmxWcGZXTW01ZUJmM3FoTFlkdlhoRnYxMVpvNmJBeWxwSkphUGNZdU8wRG5BelBSODJkT2E4Y21DMk1FQmRvaGg5UmZrcGo2TnF0SGNNVHctNWFZT2dvdXdPZHgwbFRaWTQweG1HZGdZMDY5UzEzVS1PWDdvdzNoanZCSXZQdmNGTHRQQzZPa0V1VVVBWlFKX3ZHdz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "The Trump Campaign had opportunity to put on an evidentiary hearing in front of a Trump appointed Federal judge in Wisconsin in December of 2020.  The morning of hearing Trump's Campaign lawyers chickened out and stipulated to a set of facts because they just wanted argue that recent voting rule changes were unconstitutional.  Why did they chicken out?  Because they knew their \"evidence\" of fraud was bullshit and they weren't going to risk their bar licenses for Trumps lies.\n\n>Judge Ludwig denied the state’s claims that the campaign lacked standing. Instead, he gave the campaign the hearing they asked for — the opportunity to call witnesses and submit damning exhibits. Yet, when it got down to brass tacks, the morning of the hearing, it turned out there was no actual disagreement between the Trump team and Wisconsin officials about the pertinent facts of the case. The president’s counsel basically said: Never mind, we don’t need to present all our proof . . . we’ll just stipulate to all the relevant facts and argue legal principles.\n\nhttps://www.nationalreview.com/2020/12/a-stunning-passage-from-the-latest-court-rejection-of-team-trump/",
  "label": "r/politics",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/politics",
  "datetime": "2024-05-24",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1qT1paRVpiczBXc1BENmJ3dHVvb0JkNUN0VUdZdzhCLThVbU5uTExELVlOZE0tUzBCdTRfLTJnR3FZUElCaWFYQl9nME9fei1yOWd4c1ItX1NnSlgta1E9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak8wYlY4OEZnR1dpc01FOWlINlpnTTZlOUZiOWR3Y2ZoTnduMkZKd2tXdmtDQ0FUNUkzNFNSLXJuRm1rWGVRZTBZdkRtYmxWcGZXTW01ZUJmM3FoTFlkdlhoRnYxMVpvNmJBeWxwSkphUGNZdU8wRG5BelBSODJkT2E4Y21DMk1FQmRvaGg5UmZrcGo2TnF0SGNNVHctNWFZT2dvdXdPZHgwbFRaWTQweG1HZGdZMDY5UzEzVS1PWDdvdzNoanZCSXZQdmNGTHRQQzZPa0V1VVVBWlFKX3ZHdz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information