Row 7423
Content Data
This page contains data entry 7423 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
I was going through the paper [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.04599), and saw that the authors used the following definition for the "fraction of positives" which shows up on the y-axis of the calibration curve.
https://preview.redd.it/pq9eqj16bq0d1.png?width=944&format=png&auto=webp&s=be71a70ff0e6ba77b672ca9b4315c6e7ba3d1011
From my understanding, the above equation is calculating the average accuracy in the bin m.
However, my original understanding about the "fraction of positives" was that it was the proportion of actual positive outcomes within the bin m, which intuitively makes more sense in the context of calibration curves. I have also seen this interpretation of calibration curves.
Can you fill in the hole in my knowledge?
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | I was going through the paper [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.04599), and saw that the authors used the following definition for the "fraction of positives" which shows up on the y-axis of the calibration curve. https://preview.redd.it/pq9eqj16bq0d1.png?width=944&format=png&auto=webp&s=be71a70ff0e6ba77b672ca9b4315c6e7ba3d1011 From my understanding, the above equation is calculating the average accuracy in the bin m. However, my original understanding abo… |
| label | r/machinelearning |
| dataType | post |
| communityName | r/MachineLearning |
| datetime | 2024-05-16 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwzeHJVbDZ2TFNaTHlvVzdKeDdPX1VtZXVMcDRrd0VhSmxkUTFDdVpwNVROWW1RSmVWaFBNU2JHb0RKdDVMbnJ3ZWl0LWMwN1Y0ZXVFUmF2YTdfbG9CbVE9PQ== |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9IbEtwMFE4b2g1eHNTSEZhU3l5VkFRbHEtUGx2cGI2Wi03T3V2SjBXOUY2YnpCcmsxUmpmTXFmUGVCR0JaU0tBN1Blcll2ZnBtWFg2R0l5dmVaeWp1NDlqd2FJemFrQjA2bmNZSmx2QUdNUVd2VWxVNnlEcmxqMUZrc2luc2RuVVZvX185MlhxWDdEV2EybGdkYzlUcHNMZWhlWl9oWThlZWZfenRwMmlqbzc2X2FXQU51bEdKelFXUGlhN2pNRkIwSGM5dC1UUm9lUWdDbEg3LVBvRmVIZz09 |
Raw Record
{
"text": "I was going through the paper [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.04599), and saw that the authors used the following definition for the \"fraction of positives\" which shows up on the y-axis of the calibration curve. \n\nhttps://preview.redd.it/pq9eqj16bq0d1.png?width=944&format=png&auto=webp&s=be71a70ff0e6ba77b672ca9b4315c6e7ba3d1011\n\nFrom my understanding, the above equation is calculating the average accuracy in the bin m.\n\nHowever, my original understanding about the \"fraction of positives\" was that it was the proportion of actual positive outcomes within the bin m, which intuitively makes more sense in the context of calibration curves. I have also seen this interpretation of calibration curves.\n\nCan you fill in the hole in my knowledge? ",
"label": "r/machinelearning",
"dataType": "post",
"communityName": "r/MachineLearning",
"datetime": "2024-05-16",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwzeHJVbDZ2TFNaTHlvVzdKeDdPX1VtZXVMcDRrd0VhSmxkUTFDdVpwNVROWW1RSmVWaFBNU2JHb0RKdDVMbnJ3ZWl0LWMwN1Y0ZXVFUmF2YTdfbG9CbVE9PQ==",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9IbEtwMFE4b2g1eHNTSEZhU3l5VkFRbHEtUGx2cGI2Wi03T3V2SjBXOUY2YnpCcmsxUmpmTXFmUGVCR0JaU0tBN1Blcll2ZnBtWFg2R0l5dmVaeWp1NDlqd2FJemFrQjA2bmNZSmx2QUdNUVd2VWxVNnlEcmxqMUZrc2luc2RuVVZvX185MlhxWDdEV2EybGdkYzlUcHNMZWhlWl9oWThlZWZfenRwMmlqbzc2X2FXQU51bEdKelFXUGlhN2pNRkIwSGM5dC1UUm9lUWdDbEg3LVBvRmVIZz09"
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 7423
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000