Row 71950
Content Data
This page contains data entry 71950 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
I’m not really sure that article is as conclusive as you’re saying it is. Most of the studies focused on whether Baby Einstein had any impact on vocabulary growth when babies watched it for short daily periods for 4-8 weeks, and the rest were focused specifically on video, and again, short periods
That is a far cry from what the other commenter was proposing may have the effect (daily 5 hour exposure at 150wpm over years over exposure). Not least of which the volume of data, but also, the medium. Environmental cues and observing caregivers interactions with each other and the external world have been shown to impact development. I’m not calling it an easy problem, or saying passive exposure alone could teach someone a language but I do believe it would be unintentionally but significantly oversimplifying to just scratch it out and call all passive exposure moot.
To flip the question on its head, would removing all passive exposure slow the development of a child’s vocabulary? Limiting what they overhear and can observe to **only** direct interaction? Intuitively, I would say yes, of course, but I don’t know of any settled science in **either** direction due to the ethical issues involved. The closest we might find is sequentially bilingual children, which do show a couples years of slowdown in vocabulary development in some cases, but it’s hard to say if that’s directly applicable
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | I’m not really sure that article is as conclusive as you’re saying it is. Most of the studies focused on whether Baby Einstein had any impact on vocabulary growth when babies watched it for short daily periods for 4-8 weeks, and the rest were focused specifically on video, and again, short periods That is a far cry from what the other commenter was proposing may have the effect (daily 5 hour exposure at 150wpm over years over exposure). Not least of which the volume of data, but also, the mediu… |
| label | r/machinelearning |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/MachineLearning |
| datetime | 2024-05-24 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1naVU4YnV1S3gyZjNmSTRwNU1xMS1CQm5Md2ZwMDdOc1ZUVzcxcHhNem92NFVuY1pBVEJyZUhnSEhiNWZnSW9IUXpzcTkzZ1VnYm5uQ1QzNy1OMEVib1E9PQ== |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak93RjMwc1VENmYxUU5NRDd5TWhyN0M1Ty1YSUVxMk0wbnllUmNONHk2ZW1lZU1xTUNoQWh3TmhnUGZrVjZncDQ2cERaQ1ptMEd2dFdWS3pIcm1tZ2tXSmQ1T0ljeWJhTlR5c2EtcTNwNlVkWFJNSnUtOXBteHdvZ0QzNFVLa09mUmNkNkUxSFZMbG9MVTgtSDZ3aW1rNmpSVDR3TGtfQ3NselFnQ0JjT1lJcW5zRlV2OXdlcEJROE1XM3Qya2FHN2ZoajdQVHZSRjdCSHVjLU1venV4NnUtUT09 |
Raw Record
{
"text": "I’m not really sure that article is as conclusive as you’re saying it is. Most of the studies focused on whether Baby Einstein had any impact on vocabulary growth when babies watched it for short daily periods for 4-8 weeks, and the rest were focused specifically on video, and again, short periods\n\nThat is a far cry from what the other commenter was proposing may have the effect (daily 5 hour exposure at 150wpm over years over exposure). Not least of which the volume of data, but also, the medium. Environmental cues and observing caregivers interactions with each other and the external world have been shown to impact development. I’m not calling it an easy problem, or saying passive exposure alone could teach someone a language but I do believe it would be unintentionally but significantly oversimplifying to just scratch it out and call all passive exposure moot. \n\nTo flip the question on its head, would removing all passive exposure slow the development of a child’s vocabulary? Limiting what they overhear and can observe to **only** direct interaction? Intuitively, I would say yes, of course, but I don’t know of any settled science in **either** direction due to the ethical issues involved. The closest we might find is sequentially bilingual children, which do show a couples years of slowdown in vocabulary development in some cases, but it’s hard to say if that’s directly applicable",
"label": "r/machinelearning",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/MachineLearning",
"datetime": "2024-05-24",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1naVU4YnV1S3gyZjNmSTRwNU1xMS1CQm5Md2ZwMDdOc1ZUVzcxcHhNem92NFVuY1pBVEJyZUhnSEhiNWZnSW9IUXpzcTkzZ1VnYm5uQ1QzNy1OMEVib1E9PQ==",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak93RjMwc1VENmYxUU5NRDd5TWhyN0M1Ty1YSUVxMk0wbnllUmNONHk2ZW1lZU1xTUNoQWh3TmhnUGZrVjZncDQ2cERaQ1ptMEd2dFdWS3pIcm1tZ2tXSmQ1T0ljeWJhTlR5c2EtcTNwNlVkWFJNSnUtOXBteHdvZ0QzNFVLa09mUmNkNkUxSFZMbG9MVTgtSDZ3aW1rNmpSVDR3TGtfQ3NselFnQ0JjT1lJcW5zRlV2OXdlcEJROE1XM3Qya2FHN2ZoajdQVHZSRjdCSHVjLU1venV4NnUtUT09"
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 71950
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000