Row 7086

Row ID: 7086 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 7086 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

I'm trying to find reasons this will blow up ...

I started an experiment with 10x leverage, $500 each [market volatility and bot requirements resulted in slight parameter differences]

Long entry 62.6 min 57.8 max 68.8 liq 49.9

Short 62.5 / 58 / 67 / 69.7

24 hrs: long -17.9 Unrealized, +2.7 Grid, -0.05 Funding

short 21.5 / 6.3 / 0.03

Aggregate [$1,000] 3.6 / 9.0 / -0.02 Grid profit "interest" over 300%/yr (simple) Assume reversed unrealized pnl -3.6 "intetest" is 200%, if unrealized components skewed to 2x disparity (-7.2) "interest" would be 100%

Obviously this can't work. Why?

The intent is finding a neutral place for trading assets on exchange in an uncertain trend/crab. The equivalent of putting traditional assets in money market.

If one side approached liquidation both would be closed

Edit: I'll update the results until the worst case aggregate bot return (grid - absolute value of L+S - AV funding) is negative or downvotes erase all my karma.

$1,000 (500/500) ... unrealized pnl / grid /funding / Worst case / APR 24H L: -17.9 / 2.7 / -0.05 S: 21.5 / 6.3 / 0.03 A: 3.6 / 9.0 / -0.02 / 5.4 / 196%

FieldValue
text I'm trying to find reasons this will blow up ... I started an experiment with 10x leverage, $500 each [market volatility and bot requirements resulted in slight parameter differences] Long entry 62.6 min 57.8 max 68.8 liq 49.9 Short 62.5 / 58 / 67 / 69.7 24 hrs: long -17.9 Unrealized, +2.7 Grid, -0.05 Funding short 21.5 / 6.3 / 0.03 Aggregate [$1,000] 3.6 / 9.0 / -0.02 Grid profit "interest" over 300%/yr (simple) Assume reversed unrealized pnl -3.6 "intetest" is 200%, if unrealized com…
label r/bitcoinmarkets
dataType post
communityName r/BitcoinMarkets
datetime 2024-05-15
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwzTm9LcXl4NW1kRlN2Y3JHUWNYOU52TDU2eDN4V1FDVE9rQkdNRUhGd0lsd3dlREJENG1iOTJKbTZ0V2lLTGwyWFJlSUdYUzZNZ01FeV9ZWjlvT1dNQ0E9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9HMTVvczdhTHRBT3lLdHFZYVJXUV8xTzl6WXZYQzVTQ3ZOUEhYNWJVTWhzT0N5RDRBd0oyOS1rUmRTRTRVRXp2dENmQkZpdUFXbGxwcVN2Ylp1SXdoWVhqTktsaENPczg3WVBIVkdxUEtvcFhlbHQ4WWdtX1dYaEljMjRSdHR5MkhCbDRiZi02dFlhY1NxMFA3WnA0bTlfbG5qSDJtRU45dExzNkloemhLVmh5R0dnRG9wUkVKWTBrYzZwaDRuVHNvdzBkZWRaTFhwTHgxam9kQzZVWjdIdz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "I'm trying to find reasons this will blow up ...\n\nI started an experiment with 10x leverage, $500 each [market volatility and bot requirements resulted in slight parameter differences]\n\nLong entry 62.6 min 57.8 max 68.8 liq 49.9\n\nShort 62.5 / 58  / 67 / 69.7\n\n24 hrs:  \nlong -17.9 Unrealized, +2.7 Grid, -0.05 Funding \n\nshort 21.5 / 6.3 / 0.03\n\nAggregate [$1,000] 3.6 / 9.0 / -0.02\nGrid profit \"interest\" over 300%/yr (simple)\nAssume reversed unrealized pnl -3.6 \"intetest\" is 200%, if unrealized components skewed to 2x disparity (-7.2) \"interest\" would be 100%\n\nObviously this can't work. Why?\n\nThe intent is finding a neutral place for trading assets on  exchange  in an uncertain trend/crab.  The equivalent of putting traditional assets in money market.\n\nIf one side approached liquidation both would be closed \n\nEdit: I'll update the results until the worst case aggregate bot return (grid - absolute value of L+S - AV funding) is negative or downvotes erase all my karma.\n\n$1,000 (500/500) ... unrealized pnl / grid /funding / Worst case / APR\n24H L: -17.9 / 2.7 / -0.05\n         S:  21.5 / 6.3 /  0.03\n         A:     3.6 / 9.0 / -0.02 / 5.4 / 196%",
  "label": "r/bitcoinmarkets",
  "dataType": "post",
  "communityName": "r/BitcoinMarkets",
  "datetime": "2024-05-15",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwzTm9LcXl4NW1kRlN2Y3JHUWNYOU52TDU2eDN4V1FDVE9rQkdNRUhGd0lsd3dlREJENG1iOTJKbTZ0V2lLTGwyWFJlSUdYUzZNZ01FeV9ZWjlvT1dNQ0E9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9HMTVvczdhTHRBT3lLdHFZYVJXUV8xTzl6WXZYQzVTQ3ZOUEhYNWJVTWhzT0N5RDRBd0oyOS1rUmRTRTRVRXp2dENmQkZpdUFXbGxwcVN2Ylp1SXdoWVhqTktsaENPczg3WVBIVkdxUEtvcFhlbHQ4WWdtX1dYaEljMjRSdHR5MkhCbDRiZi02dFlhY1NxMFA3WnA0bTlfbG5qSDJtRU45dExzNkloemhLVmh5R0dnRG9wUkVKWTBrYzZwaDRuVHNvdzBkZWRaTFhwTHgxam9kQzZVWjdIdz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information