Row 6881

Row ID: 6881 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 6881 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Hi all,

I thought this might be a good place to discuss about MICCAI 2024 decisions (early accept, rebuttal, early reject). The email mentions that there were 2869 submissions this year (+21% as compared to last year) and around 54% of them have been invited for rebuttal.

I got a rebuttal invitation for an application paper and all the reviewers mentioned "lack of technical novelty" as the weakness, so I ended up getting a Weak Accept (4), Weak Reject (3), and Reject (2). I believe I can write a decent rebuttal countering most of reviewers points. But given the low scores, does anyone think there is any hope for this paper getting accepted? Does the rebuttal make any difference for low scoring papers (after the first round)? What fraction of papers in the rebuttal phase were finally got an acceptance last year?

FieldValue
text Hi all, I thought this might be a good place to discuss about MICCAI 2024 decisions (early accept, rebuttal, early reject). The email mentions that there were 2869 submissions this year (+21% as compared to last year) and around 54% of them have been invited for rebuttal. I got a rebuttal invitation for an application paper and all the reviewers mentioned "lack of technical novelty" as the weakness, so I ended up getting a Weak Accept (4), Weak Reject (3), and Reject (2). I believe I can write…
label r/machinelearning
dataType post
communityName r/MachineLearning
datetime 2024-05-14
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwzVjlqSmhhcWEtUVlHaXZpblFIRTFQT2ZOMWFYNG4zZG93STNuMktPTmpha2FGdmZFal9WZXJGeklyVVpYS194NGVpcHEwU3I5UFR5MThUallDN0wxMFE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9HbGExd2FnUThUV29lUlQzbk5WclY2OXZrLW9nZjlSSnJSVjVOSjMwcVdiN0RRX3pONHpVOWx0YlpyeWxpa0tOTjFIc0dDanpEV29TVnBOaThvckU3Zy1tNFRQTnpoRGR6LUlDbTBJbDIyZGxPYkp6ckp5VkhBUU0yZFp1SkQ2RWFKeHlDcW9rcDdNV2c0TzlSdGc1bEloSXZOVGM3TWhzeTlHNUFWV2dhdHMyUXNFLW5LRWxzQWhmZm5ybUthOGll

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Hi all,\n\nI thought this might be a good place to discuss about MICCAI 2024 decisions (early accept, rebuttal, early reject). The email mentions that there were 2869 submissions this year (+21% as compared to last year) and around 54% of them have been invited for rebuttal.\n\nI got a rebuttal invitation for an application paper and all the reviewers mentioned \"lack of technical novelty\" as the weakness, so I ended up getting a Weak Accept (4), Weak Reject (3), and Reject (2). I believe I can write a decent rebuttal countering most of reviewers points. But given the low scores, does anyone think there is any hope for this paper getting accepted? Does the rebuttal make any difference for low scoring papers (after the first round)? What fraction of papers in the rebuttal phase were finally got an acceptance last year?",
  "label": "r/machinelearning",
  "dataType": "post",
  "communityName": "r/MachineLearning",
  "datetime": "2024-05-14",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwzVjlqSmhhcWEtUVlHaXZpblFIRTFQT2ZOMWFYNG4zZG93STNuMktPTmpha2FGdmZFal9WZXJGeklyVVpYS194NGVpcHEwU3I5UFR5MThUallDN0wxMFE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9HbGExd2FnUThUV29lUlQzbk5WclY2OXZrLW9nZjlSSnJSVjVOSjMwcVdiN0RRX3pONHpVOWx0YlpyeWxpa0tOTjFIc0dDanpEV29TVnBOaThvckU3Zy1tNFRQTnpoRGR6LUlDbTBJbDIyZGxPYkp6ckp5VkhBUU0yZFp1SkQ2RWFKeHlDcW9rcDdNV2c0TzlSdGc1bEloSXZOVGM3TWhzeTlHNUFWV2dhdHMyUXNFLW5LRWxzQWhmZm5ybUthOGll"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information