Row 682

Row ID: 682 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 682 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Capital output ratio and inequality are equivalent in this case, because they reflect the division of output between labour ('the masses') and capital (owned by a rich 'elite'). This is how Piketty relates capital output ratios to inequality.

I ***never*** said his model is bad (it is, but that's a story for another day). I argued the representation K/Y = s'/(g+s'δ) is preferable to K/(Y-δK) = s'/g - these are two different representations of the same equation.

FieldValue
text Capital output ratio and inequality are equivalent in this case, because they reflect the division of output between labour ('the masses') and capital (owned by a rich 'elite'). This is how Piketty relates capital output ratios to inequality. I ***never*** said his model is bad (it is, but that's a story for another day). I argued the representation K/Y = s'/(g+s'δ) is preferable to K/(Y-δK) = s'/g - these are two different representations of the same equation.
label r/econpapers
dataType comment
communityName r/EconPapers
datetime 2021-07-30
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakx6QUc2cEkybGFfel84c2lONFpOVkc1R19BMXp3bHFzbldtM3NhQWdzN09STkdnSlg1RVlzTHZSZm1RMEpJaGZ1UHhuRncxQy04RGhGNlFCbTlzOWx3WHc9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9EVzNER09ENVozaHl4N0RUMl9HQ19qNDJrOUpmYzEzYmx4SzB5cV84WHpjZWFIMGNITnZKb3RoRHpVdHFvMnNjNllPWVNIbGFfT0EzYzQyYXc2ejlpQzZiODBDNkp2aWUwVVhBeTlTT3UwdmxJRmZsT2hoTEw5encyN3NCQUctb3F3MVY2bkhHajllckNyV3FZdnJvT2dNbXM0SHVaSjcxNEQxX1M1bWlCWHFGNFRCQzR6X1FqdUpMN2Vva0otWlZ2eEUwR29Xd2FXVmhvcmZ3Z3RaTjdLQT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Capital output ratio and inequality are equivalent in this case, because they reflect the division of output between labour ('the masses') and capital (owned by a rich 'elite'). This is how Piketty relates capital output ratios to inequality.\n\nI ***never*** said his model is bad (it is, but that's a story for another day). I argued the representation K/Y = s'/(g+s'δ) is preferable to K/(Y-δK) = s'/g - these are two different representations of the same equation.",
  "label": "r/econpapers",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/EconPapers",
  "datetime": "2021-07-30",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakx6QUc2cEkybGFfel84c2lONFpOVkc1R19BMXp3bHFzbldtM3NhQWdzN09STkdnSlg1RVlzTHZSZm1RMEpJaGZ1UHhuRncxQy04RGhGNlFCbTlzOWx3WHc9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9EVzNER09ENVozaHl4N0RUMl9HQ19qNDJrOUpmYzEzYmx4SzB5cV84WHpjZWFIMGNITnZKb3RoRHpVdHFvMnNjNllPWVNIbGFfT0EzYzQyYXc2ejlpQzZiODBDNkp2aWUwVVhBeTlTT3UwdmxJRmZsT2hoTEw5encyN3NCQUctb3F3MVY2bkhHajllckNyV3FZdnJvT2dNbXM0SHVaSjcxNEQxX1M1bWlCWHFGNFRCQzR6X1FqdUpMN2Vva0otWlZ2eEUwR29Xd2FXVmhvcmZ3Z3RaTjdLQT09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information