Row 65001

Row ID: 65001 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 65001 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

> The case, Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P., No. 22-807, is superficially similar to one from Alabama in which the court ruled in June that state lawmakers had diluted the power of Black voters in drawing a congressional voting map. But the two cases involve distinct legal principles.

> The Alabama case was governed by the Voting Rights Act, the landmark civil rights statute, and the one from South Carolina by the Constitution’s equal protection clause. The two can tug in different directions.

FieldValue
text > The case, Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P., No. 22-807, is superficially similar to one from Alabama in which the court ruled in June that state lawmakers had diluted the power of Black voters in drawing a congressional voting map. But the two cases involve distinct legal principles. > The Alabama case was governed by the Voting Rights Act, the landmark civil rights statute, and the one from South Carolina by the Constitution’s equal protection clause. The two ca…
label r/politics
dataType comment
communityName r/politics
datetime 2024-05-23
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1iSVIxYXhlaEVwQUlaRjBhUU95SnhCdEFVSUw3dGVvQ2FHNHRGaVhQVlZaUGE5cVY0c2JoNHROVllHbm5xaFFnNEtLdGdUQWh2MnJNV2tvTjM1RzlEUDZ3bTQwZzlUbXVhTTVhRGdVUjUwbmc9
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9zR3o4TnI5MVNtclJUSlRIbFdDNWR3VFNkMFlqei13LXotS0doWnk3eVhsbFVUcnhROEZEV1h5UEJGb3pHdDRRTGhlRHQyR0x5UEF2aTcwVTJBRGd3S2x6SkRlQ1psWWhhaVRNSjBiS1A0Uk1NRXdncUg5WU91TVF6X3UtX2IwT09JZ1J2NEFZR3RJMUVETXMyNkFVQ0Q5TzAzbnhaMVJDRHJyOW0tLWItVFRlaGlOWjl6eTNqYVgtMkZRamNIZ0Q1WVFsanAtaW5iQzFpb2ZwcFA0UG9hdz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "> The case, Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P., No. 22-807, is superficially similar to one from Alabama in which the court ruled in June that state lawmakers had diluted the power of Black voters in drawing a congressional voting map. But the two cases involve distinct legal principles.\n\n> The Alabama case was governed by the Voting Rights Act, the landmark civil rights statute, and the one from South Carolina by the Constitution’s equal protection clause. The two can tug in different directions.",
  "label": "r/politics",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/politics",
  "datetime": "2024-05-23",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1iSVIxYXhlaEVwQUlaRjBhUU95SnhCdEFVSUw3dGVvQ2FHNHRGaVhQVlZaUGE5cVY0c2JoNHROVllHbm5xaFFnNEtLdGdUQWh2MnJNV2tvTjM1RzlEUDZ3bTQwZzlUbXVhTTVhRGdVUjUwbmc9",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9zR3o4TnI5MVNtclJUSlRIbFdDNWR3VFNkMFlqei13LXotS0doWnk3eVhsbFVUcnhROEZEV1h5UEJGb3pHdDRRTGhlRHQyR0x5UEF2aTcwVTJBRGd3S2x6SkRlQ1psWWhhaVRNSjBiS1A0Uk1NRXdncUg5WU91TVF6X3UtX2IwT09JZ1J2NEFZR3RJMUVETXMyNkFVQ0Q5TzAzbnhaMVJDRHJyOW0tLWItVFRlaGlOWjl6eTNqYVgtMkZRamNIZ0Q1WVFsanAtaW5iQzFpb2ZwcFA0UG9hdz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information