Row 6288

Row ID: 6288 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 6288 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

I submitted a paper.

Gets accepted to conference.

Got email from some random dude from \_insert\_university\_. Sending to both the chair and conference head.

Accuses me a plagarism and says 92% matching of publish papers...

Check cross reference. Title, authors (me and the mentor), data, conclusion, and almost the entire paper is highlighted.

Only source says Arkiv. I have my pre-print on there by chance. I followed their policies with pre-prints and put the notices.

Now, this is very stupid. I done a lot of due diligence and if its matching the authors, it has to be referencing my pre-print.

Why are reviewers so lazy and can do such drastic actions instead of just asking authors questions about these? I seriously don't understand some of these people. Do you have any suggestions about dealing with these situations?

FieldValue
text I submitted a paper. Gets accepted to conference. Got email from some random dude from \_insert\_university\_. Sending to both the chair and conference head. Accuses me a plagarism and says 92% matching of publish papers... Check cross reference. Title, authors (me and the mentor), data, conclusion, and almost the entire paper is highlighted. Only source says Arkiv. I have my pre-print on there by chance. I followed their policies with pre-prints and put the notices. Now, this is very stup…
label r/machinelearning
dataType post
communityName r/MachineLearning
datetime 2024-05-09
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwyZmhrMFFvM2xoMXpnZHJXQTVtNi1VeWhrQ3VXYk55bFF6bi1pSjR5VVFEa081aTdtSW5iTWN1aXlCS1NCNE5qeHFMRzdhN3Y2YnJTZmt6VGI1U1Ffd0k0YjQ2V2o0aDgwRXJqempfcDY3WEk9
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9HT2RHMXRDbk1GZzBrblZpUmxjUTFmcjBackhjdi1neFNLd19SODcxaEZiRWVtSFpmMXpId3pEU0pSdEFjS1M4ZkZPUEt4MTJhelcyOUg0WGJfTWZrQVJVMXQ4Z1pRZlZWSldXTkhfRk9zejVEcW5FVURTa3c0WWpUTm1SU1E5M0NtVjFZUkE4c01TckR1bDhQeTJSbzdOUnE1djVhd25ybi03dFk5ZGd0ekZWSzJsTWRnSXQyRExaV25vUGllTTVvYVZKZjJ2WloxOEVRa2hiWUxfcTdiZz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "I submitted a paper.\n\nGets accepted to conference.\n\nGot email from some random dude from \\_insert\\_university\\_. Sending to both the chair and conference head.\n\nAccuses me a plagarism and says 92% matching of publish papers...\n\nCheck cross reference. Title, authors (me and the mentor), data, conclusion, and almost the entire paper is highlighted.\n\nOnly source says Arkiv. I have my pre-print on there by chance. I followed their policies with pre-prints and put the notices.\n\nNow, this is very stupid. I done a lot of due diligence and if its matching the authors, it has to be referencing my pre-print.\n\nWhy are reviewers so lazy and can do such drastic actions instead of just asking authors questions about these? I seriously don't understand some of these people. Do you have any suggestions about dealing with these situations?",
  "label": "r/machinelearning",
  "dataType": "post",
  "communityName": "r/MachineLearning",
  "datetime": "2024-05-09",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwyZmhrMFFvM2xoMXpnZHJXQTVtNi1VeWhrQ3VXYk55bFF6bi1pSjR5VVFEa081aTdtSW5iTWN1aXlCS1NCNE5qeHFMRzdhN3Y2YnJTZmt6VGI1U1Ffd0k0YjQ2V2o0aDgwRXJqempfcDY3WEk9",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9HT2RHMXRDbk1GZzBrblZpUmxjUTFmcjBackhjdi1neFNLd19SODcxaEZiRWVtSFpmMXpId3pEU0pSdEFjS1M4ZkZPUEt4MTJhelcyOUg0WGJfTWZrQVJVMXQ4Z1pRZlZWSldXTkhfRk9zejVEcW5FVURTa3c0WWpUTm1SU1E5M0NtVjFZUkE4c01TckR1bDhQeTJSbzdOUnE1djVhd25ybi03dFk5ZGd0ekZWSzJsTWRnSXQyRExaV25vUGllTTVvYVZKZjJ2WloxOEVRa2hiWUxfcTdiZz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information