Row 61796

Row ID: 61796 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 61796 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

It will not be overturned on appeal, as it is written in black and white what the violation is.

This has been repeated ad nauseum in this thread, and I'm very sorry if you're too thick to get it into your head despite us going in circles and circles.

1. A campaign violation law committed by Michael Cohen was masked by these payments, the law doesn't say that the crime being concealed has to be committed by the perpetrator of the Business Fraud in the First Degree case.

2. Tax fraud was committed when the reimbursement payments were processed as legal fees, as extra money was added to the payments to account for the tax that was to be paid for work, that wouldn't be taken if the payment was for reimbursement of a campaign payment.

3. All this was done to deliberately hide information from the public that could have influenced the election.

Take your pick.

And before you go back to the next canned response in your cycle about where the charges were, I will repeat what I've posted 10 times now:

>A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an ***INTENT*** to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Intent is the key word there, these crimes do not have to have been proven in other cases. As long as the intent to commit those crimes can be proven in ***THIS*** case, then he is guilty of Falsifying Business records of the First degree.

And yes, those crimes can be federal OR state, and it does not matter if they would be misdemeanor or felony charges.

This case is not about the crime, its about the cover-up.

FieldValue
text It will not be overturned on appeal, as it is written in black and white what the violation is. This has been repeated ad nauseum in this thread, and I'm very sorry if you're too thick to get it into your head despite us going in circles and circles. 1. A campaign violation law committed by Michael Cohen was masked by these payments, the law doesn't say that the crime being concealed has to be committed by the perpetrator of the Business Fraud in the First Degree case. 2. Tax fraud was commi…
label r/politics
dataType comment
communityName r/politics
datetime 2024-05-23
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1acFBxMlBMdHNwRUNRZHdaa2RyMVo3Q3owNXdBUVRsR0dyZ2laRm52SzZpazZFaXJESTVOOFBWb3NScFNJOWozaHA2S0xJYXVQbnZPY2gteDZNdU9vSnc9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9wOXVRRlhTWXYxR1pnb2dqS2NIX0E1TmRXRGh6SXBmazlxODFTejBqMEZTN3FQd0RDRnhVTVVkc2NLVzdFOVA2N2dONWxfUXg1dVBhbFA0SF9DSFY2QXpPU2dESEFSYmp6UVRLSEpyYlExMXNYcktoakJnX2gtS3oydnBRVmYyTUI0bVF1NWY3VG9nLU5aZkRxbnpPTDdVd3pVb192eHVlOHl0V1NyQUNGWWhjT3J0TEFkUHE1Y0ZGdmVWTFVibmNjQUZyODg5QzFibmV4bl9HRWtWU3FBdz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "It will not be overturned on appeal, as it is written in black and white what the violation is. \n\nThis has been repeated ad nauseum in this thread, and I'm very sorry if you're too thick to get it into your head despite us going in circles and circles.\n\n1. A campaign violation law committed by Michael Cohen was masked by these payments, the law doesn't say that the crime being concealed has to be committed by the perpetrator of the Business Fraud in the First Degree case.\n\n2. Tax fraud was committed when the reimbursement payments were processed as legal fees, as extra money was added to the payments to account for the tax that was to be paid for work, that wouldn't be taken if the payment was for reimbursement of a campaign payment.\n\n3. All this was done to deliberately hide information from the public that could have influenced the election.\n\nTake your pick.\n\nAnd before you go back to the next canned response in your cycle about where the charges were, I will repeat what I've posted 10 times now: \n\n>A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree\nwhen he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second\ndegree, and when his intent to defraud includes an ***INTENT*** to commit\nanother crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.\n\nIntent is the key word there, these crimes do not have to have been proven in other cases. As long as the intent to commit those crimes can be proven in ***THIS*** case, then he is guilty of Falsifying Business records of the First degree.\n\nAnd yes, those crimes can be federal OR state, and it does not matter if they would be misdemeanor or felony charges.\n\nThis case is not about the crime, its about the cover-up.",
  "label": "r/politics",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/politics",
  "datetime": "2024-05-23",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1acFBxMlBMdHNwRUNRZHdaa2RyMVo3Q3owNXdBUVRsR0dyZ2laRm52SzZpazZFaXJESTVOOFBWb3NScFNJOWozaHA2S0xJYXVQbnZPY2gteDZNdU9vSnc9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9wOXVRRlhTWXYxR1pnb2dqS2NIX0E1TmRXRGh6SXBmazlxODFTejBqMEZTN3FQd0RDRnhVTVVkc2NLVzdFOVA2N2dONWxfUXg1dVBhbFA0SF9DSFY2QXpPU2dESEFSYmp6UVRLSEpyYlExMXNYcktoakJnX2gtS3oydnBRVmYyTUI0bVF1NWY3VG9nLU5aZkRxbnpPTDdVd3pVb192eHVlOHl0V1NyQUNGWWhjT3J0TEFkUHE1Y0ZGdmVWTFVibmNjQUZyODg5QzFibmV4bl9HRWtWU3FBdz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information