Row 61397

Row ID: 61397 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 61397 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

I think it’s different. We already can have “high level abstractions” and an actually a lot of QC programming is done in high level languages like python. But to understand what is happening I do think the circuit representation is better: you can have different gates on different qbits and with entanglement it can be a mess to keep in mind what’s going on by just looking at sequential code. And as an added point, the circuit representation is actually hardware agnostic: it does not care if your computer is photon-based or is made of cold-atoms. Every type of QC implements gates differently, and some only approximate quantum universality (the ability to implant any unitary operations)!

I do also think that when QC will be mature, since they are useful for only a handful of problems, we will just refer to what algorithm the computer is running.

Like we just call GroversAlgorithm(X) and forget what’s underneath.

FieldValue
text I think it’s different. We already can have “high level abstractions” and an actually a lot of QC programming is done in high level languages like python. But to understand what is happening I do think the circuit representation is better: you can have different gates on different qbits and with entanglement it can be a mess to keep in mind what’s going on by just looking at sequential code. And as an added point, the circuit representation is actually hardware agnostic: it does not care if your…
label r/quantumcomputing
dataType comment
communityName r/QuantumComputing
datetime 2024-05-23
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1aOXQxdzRudnRRaG5XWmE4a2dfNzN3TWVFY011MjNUZVpEY0dneGJZMXBCS0dmV3RnNEFwQWFBRjFPNGRZU0ctMnFTZlJiYkRXM19Dcnl6dThKQV9MRlE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9wMnJza2JFWURmTEVMc2d3QVc3OWtzTlBJOXpmZk1vNV9QTFpVeVFXZDJIR1UwLWFXN3dJZkpsMjJKcDlpQUx2YUplVFM1Rm1qVnotUW1GOGdCYUpOQXZyY1hvTzhDV19odU1YQ3RCSHcxeXJ1Y2IwaS1JMURNTnhiRExlUHpOUzh3aHRiOVBOSURzMkROM3Z6ellqS2lkeDZzWFB2LWMtQVdOWU9SZ09fN0JhT0kwRF8zUmV6Y1RvaU9PaU4yampQdmxQYzBaZlZucjJOWlg3NFhjeEk3WG95YUJuUWdWM1FfcDNHQS1qUXRvTT0=

Raw Record

{
  "text": "I think it’s different. We already can have “high level abstractions” and an actually a lot of QC programming is done in high level languages like python. But to understand what is happening I do think the circuit representation is better: you can have different gates on different qbits and with entanglement it can be a mess to keep in mind what’s going on by just looking at sequential code. And as an added point, the circuit representation is actually hardware agnostic: it does not care if your computer is photon-based or is made of cold-atoms. Every type of QC implements gates differently, and some only approximate quantum universality (the ability to implant any unitary operations)!\n\nI do also think that when QC will be mature, since they are useful for only a handful of problems, we will just refer to what algorithm the computer is running.\n\nLike we just call GroversAlgorithm(X) and forget what’s underneath.",
  "label": "r/quantumcomputing",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/QuantumComputing",
  "datetime": "2024-05-23",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1aOXQxdzRudnRRaG5XWmE4a2dfNzN3TWVFY011MjNUZVpEY0dneGJZMXBCS0dmV3RnNEFwQWFBRjFPNGRZU0ctMnFTZlJiYkRXM19Dcnl6dThKQV9MRlE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9wMnJza2JFWURmTEVMc2d3QVc3OWtzTlBJOXpmZk1vNV9QTFpVeVFXZDJIR1UwLWFXN3dJZkpsMjJKcDlpQUx2YUplVFM1Rm1qVnotUW1GOGdCYUpOQXZyY1hvTzhDV19odU1YQ3RCSHcxeXJ1Y2IwaS1JMURNTnhiRExlUHpOUzh3aHRiOVBOSURzMkROM3Z6ellqS2lkeDZzWFB2LWMtQVdOWU9SZ09fN0JhT0kwRF8zUmV6Y1RvaU9PaU4yampQdmxQYzBaZlZucjJOWlg3NFhjeEk3WG95YUJuUWdWM1FfcDNHQS1qUXRvTT0="
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information