Row 6136

Row ID: 6136 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 6136 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Make ML-2 be the standard across the board, and anything higher shows increased security posture.

ML-0 <60% Unacceptable ML-1 60-70 Unacceptable ML-2 70-80 acceptable (Baseline) ML-3 80-90 excellent ML-4 90-100 outstanding

ML-2 BASELINE IN ALL FUNCTIONS: IDENTIFY PROTECT DETECT RESPOND RECOVERY

Must pass all checks in ML level to achieve next ML. Example: missing one check in ML-0 but passed all ML-1 checks still keep you at ML-0.

Suggestion: Make interview questions subjective and not count towards a ML. This gives a better understanding of what the site needs to polish up on.

When conducting a cyber review. It's best to give the site a workbook on what's expected and what you will be looking at/for. This gives time for policies to be updated and no surprises. When the inspection has been completed, give the site a ML score and a 90 remediation period to boost their ML.

FieldValue
text Make ML-2 be the standard across the board, and anything higher shows increased security posture. ML-0 <60% Unacceptable ML-1 60-70 Unacceptable ML-2 70-80 acceptable (Baseline) ML-3 80-90 excellent ML-4 90-100 outstanding ML-2 BASELINE IN ALL FUNCTIONS: IDENTIFY PROTECT DETECT RESPOND RECOVERY Must pass all checks in ML level to achieve next ML. Example: missing one check in ML-0 but passed all ML-1 checks still keep you at ML-0. Suggestion: Make interview questions subjective and not co…
label r/information_security
dataType comment
communityName r/Information_Security
datetime 2024-05-07
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwyS1JJbzgtZFZkcWZLcEVxTk9NVmVyY3ZON3VYeUFFME96MEFMSUl0MHNMVUo2cVZ6UHA2LU1wY3ZhcGVBRDUxdElrWkZOakM3dWRhTjNXY1UxQ0V1UFE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9HWGhhRVZ6TGhVbU5OTE1kelFNblQ4RUVndkhnenhSUExIT3oxWEZkU3ZtRFJOLUJUNmpTckpaWTA0YjBqMGdIbHk2YjEzYWtlMjdHNzFJUlNlT0JPZmRXWkQyTURGT2k2QVB5Tl95MEZONmZ5bWNEaVd5cWJ0eW5ib3N4MGppSkdGUVZ3VXZxaFZQVGpnUldEdFZPUXp1VXpnQjFCMFR3Qk9pRE93T21WbGRYTlJhLXZVaDJ6SDlvWDVnaS1QTTQtbk5YcmpMVTVlRDFFWjBDYVVhdklENUJ3a3NqTlJGRDJZbDNrcTJoU1V0az0=

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Make ML-2 be the standard across the board, and anything higher shows increased security posture.\n\nML-0 <60% Unacceptable\nML-1 60-70 Unacceptable\nML-2 70-80 acceptable (Baseline)\nML-3 80-90 excellent\nML-4 90-100 outstanding\n\nML-2 BASELINE IN ALL FUNCTIONS:\nIDENTIFY \nPROTECT\nDETECT\nRESPOND\nRECOVERY \n\nMust pass all checks in ML level to achieve next ML. \nExample: missing one check in ML-0 but passed all ML-1 checks still keep you at ML-0.\n\nSuggestion:\nMake interview questions subjective and not count towards a ML. This gives a better understanding of what the site needs to polish up on.\n\nWhen conducting a cyber review. It's best to give the site a workbook on what's expected and what you will be looking at/for. This gives time for policies to be updated and no surprises. When the inspection has been completed, give the site a ML score and a 90 remediation period to boost their ML.",
  "label": "r/information_security",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/Information_Security",
  "datetime": "2024-05-07",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwyS1JJbzgtZFZkcWZLcEVxTk9NVmVyY3ZON3VYeUFFME96MEFMSUl0MHNMVUo2cVZ6UHA2LU1wY3ZhcGVBRDUxdElrWkZOakM3dWRhTjNXY1UxQ0V1UFE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9HWGhhRVZ6TGhVbU5OTE1kelFNblQ4RUVndkhnenhSUExIT3oxWEZkU3ZtRFJOLUJUNmpTckpaWTA0YjBqMGdIbHk2YjEzYWtlMjdHNzFJUlNlT0JPZmRXWkQyTURGT2k2QVB5Tl95MEZONmZ5bWNEaVd5cWJ0eW5ib3N4MGppSkdGUVZ3VXZxaFZQVGpnUldEdFZPUXp1VXpnQjFCMFR3Qk9pRE93T21WbGRYTlJhLXZVaDJ6SDlvWDVnaS1QTTQtbk5YcmpMVTVlRDFFWjBDYVVhdklENUJ3a3NqTlJGRDJZbDNrcTJoU1V0az0="
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information