Row 6032
Content Data
This page contains data entry 6032 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
I'm very confused about the math in this article. In order for credibility to be reduced to zero, doesn't it have to be greater than zero at some point?
The Associated Press supports Lachlan Cartwright's thesis of "Whatever sort of credibility [the Enquirer] had was totally damaged by what happened in court this week." The article's statements include "Celebrity news [reported by the Enquirer]... may have been true. It may have had just a whiff of truth. It was rarely boring." and "For all the ridicule the tabloid received from 'serious' journalists, Enquirer reporters hustled and broke some genuine news."
To assert that the Enquirer had at some points low but not no credibility is to legitimize or defend tabloid "journalism". By doing so, the AP themselves are effectively functioning as a tabloid.
This is a repost because per mods, my OP "didn't make [my] intended critism [sic] apparent. (to put it nicely)." I'm not sure why I was asked to belabor critism I felt was pretty obvious, but hopefully by going through my critism point by point I have made the intended critism clear to the r/media_critism community.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | I'm very confused about the math in this article. In order for credibility to be reduced to zero, doesn't it have to be greater than zero at some point? The Associated Press supports Lachlan Cartwright's thesis of "Whatever sort of credibility [the Enquirer] had was totally damaged by what happened in court this week." The article's statements include "Celebrity news [reported by the Enquirer]... may have been true. It may have had just a whiff of truth. It was rarely boring." and "For all the … |
| label | r/media_criticism |
| dataType | post |
| communityName | r/media_criticism |
| datetime | 2024-05-06 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwyaEdGVFY2dmdSOVRMb3p6c1JETkd0NlhLRHBJRXZMRVJWWTJhcE1nbzFYcHpCTWdET3dHSVNMSEtWYmt3bE1Fd01BTFMxcVptU1Zqa1FfOGhnS0RKb3c9PQ== |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9HX01PUEpXT3V6cXNQMjJQckFIZW13Qlota2d2QUdZemh5NzM1SkpmcURMV21tZDNwSVdLV1lQLUItWXptZDdRZmROZFl2N01wRURkbjhNSkV0WXNxMl9QVm9abUVPUWJBMC1tM0JnVXFVXzBLekpQZ2wxLURyM2VETGRwZDBxWVNvVER0VUZKVlJkUi1BVjhNbTZGTmNsbTV1TkZqS2VIZGU2NDFoSjBCN0VBPQ== |
Raw Record
{
"text": "I'm very confused about the math in this article. In order for credibility to be reduced to zero, doesn't it have to be greater than zero at some point?\n\nThe Associated Press supports Lachlan Cartwright's thesis of \"Whatever sort of credibility [the Enquirer] had was totally damaged by what happened in court this week.\" The article's statements include \"Celebrity news [reported by the Enquirer]... may have been true. It may have had just a whiff of truth. It was rarely boring.\" and \"For all the ridicule the tabloid received from 'serious' journalists, Enquirer reporters hustled and broke some genuine news.\"\n\nTo assert that the Enquirer had at some points low but not no credibility is to legitimize or defend tabloid \"journalism\". By doing so, the AP themselves are effectively functioning as a tabloid.\n\nThis is a repost because per mods, my OP \"didn't make [my] intended critism [sic] apparent. (to put it nicely).\" I'm not sure why I was asked to belabor critism I felt was pretty obvious, but hopefully by going through my critism point by point I have made the intended critism clear to the r/media_critism community.",
"label": "r/media_criticism",
"dataType": "post",
"communityName": "r/media_criticism",
"datetime": "2024-05-06",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwyaEdGVFY2dmdSOVRMb3p6c1JETkd0NlhLRHBJRXZMRVJWWTJhcE1nbzFYcHpCTWdET3dHSVNMSEtWYmt3bE1Fd01BTFMxcVptU1Zqa1FfOGhnS0RKb3c9PQ==",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9HX01PUEpXT3V6cXNQMjJQckFIZW13Qlota2d2QUdZemh5NzM1SkpmcURMV21tZDNwSVdLV1lQLUItWXptZDdRZmROZFl2N01wRURkbjhNSkV0WXNxMl9QVm9abUVPUWJBMC1tM0JnVXFVXzBLekpQZ2wxLURyM2VETGRwZDBxWVNvVER0VUZKVlJkUi1BVjhNbTZGTmNsbTV1TkZqS2VIZGU2NDFoSjBCN0VBPQ=="
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 6032
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000