Row 59724

Row ID: 59724 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 59724 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

The crazy thing is she could still win a court case. They can prove the actor was someone else and that her voice wasn't used, which is good. But it's not possible for them to prove that they *didn't* purposefully endeavor to create a similar voice.

So it could come down to if her team can convince the court that the intent was to create a voice that sounds like hers/the movie Her. Because then there is still potential for a win on copyright grounds.

And Sam's contacts + tweet would be good evidence for them there.

Copyright doesn't require someone to actually copy something directly, but simply to create something similar with the original directly in mind. If the result isn't considered to be substantially different/transformative enough, then a claim can hold.

Not sure if she'd really pursue this. And I have no idea who'd win. But it wouldn't be the craziest copyright case in a US court, and it probably wouldn't even be the craziest win of all time if she won, either.

FieldValue
text The crazy thing is she could still win a court case. They can prove the actor was someone else and that her voice wasn't used, which is good. But it's not possible for them to prove that they *didn't* purposefully endeavor to create a similar voice. So it could come down to if her team can convince the court that the intent was to create a voice that sounds like hers/the movie Her. Because then there is still potential for a win on copyright grounds. And Sam's contacts + tweet would be good ev…
label r/openai
dataType comment
communityName r/OpenAI
datetime 2024-05-23
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1ZSGl1S0tJdUhDYktORkxmZlFDQm9LOGwxQ0V1WVM4MElPMlFnVHhzMnRVc2l4VUw2OFNwU1hURjU0aUozRmw2eW15OXg0RDMxVVdrZlRGVWNiRHVQU1E9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9vSXo3UUhmdkZhZWppcEh4cGxWX3BVQVRNMV9ubTFjaExmV21oLV9iZndtdzNJcG1IZXdGWVZXZGpxTzNmamlaTkUzOXB2VV9NMUl0SjFsR1JDSmRsSjY1bkJocWlhVUoycEE4Sm01SUdhVFFKRV96ODY4UV9JT2QwQUF5el9aalVvMklrV3FPU3RNOVZUa1FHUHJxTlZjSFdhRkxkdnhneUpnVndjbHBsbmxNVk5sS1pERUo5QTdVNGRBNGhZUGJ0cVlEcVQwRGhYM2pVbzNLeUFnWHJLUT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "The crazy thing is she could still win a court case. They can prove the actor was someone else and that her voice wasn't used, which is good. But it's not possible for them to prove that they *didn't* purposefully endeavor to create a similar voice.\n\nSo it could come down to if her team can convince the court that the intent was to create a voice that sounds like hers/the movie Her. Because then there is still potential for a win on copyright grounds.\n\nAnd Sam's contacts + tweet would be good evidence for them there.\n\nCopyright doesn't require someone to actually copy something directly, but simply to create something similar with the original directly in mind. If the result isn't considered to be substantially different/transformative enough, then a claim can hold.\n\nNot sure if she'd really pursue this. And I have no idea who'd win. But it wouldn't be the craziest copyright case in a US court, and it probably wouldn't even be the craziest win of all time if she won, either.",
  "label": "r/openai",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/OpenAI",
  "datetime": "2024-05-23",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1ZSGl1S0tJdUhDYktORkxmZlFDQm9LOGwxQ0V1WVM4MElPMlFnVHhzMnRVc2l4VUw2OFNwU1hURjU0aUozRmw2eW15OXg0RDMxVVdrZlRGVWNiRHVQU1E9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9vSXo3UUhmdkZhZWppcEh4cGxWX3BVQVRNMV9ubTFjaExmV21oLV9iZndtdzNJcG1IZXdGWVZXZGpxTzNmamlaTkUzOXB2VV9NMUl0SjFsR1JDSmRsSjY1bkJocWlhVUoycEE4Sm01SUdhVFFKRV96ODY4UV9JT2QwQUF5el9aalVvMklrV3FPU3RNOVZUa1FHUHJxTlZjSFdhRkxkdnhneUpnVndjbHBsbmxNVk5sS1pERUo5QTdVNGRBNGhZUGJ0cVlEcVQwRGhYM2pVbzNLeUFnWHJLUT09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information