Row 582
Content Data
This page contains data entry 582 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
Thanks for your response :) I genuinely didn't think anyone would answer.
I agree that there are a lot of political matters at play. Whilst AD disputes may have origins in private company matters, I don't think that they are privately run. In China, any AD dispute goes to MOFCOM first and then is settled in the WTO if necessary. Same thing in Australia with the AD Commission. These institutions effectively support their respective private claimants/defendants, but they are public institutions and thus political in nature.
But, even if we had a strong dispute settlement body, I don't think that it would make trade policy much better. This is because of how time-consuming and costly settling the dispute actually is. If the law around AD was clearer and narrower, the imposition of a tariff would be more blatantly in breach of these provisions. The blatancy of such a breach might make private and public entities less likely to infringe these rules, thus proactively preventing ridiculous tariffs from being imposed under the guise of an AD duty (but this is up for debate).
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | Thanks for your response :) I genuinely didn't think anyone would answer. I agree that there are a lot of political matters at play. Whilst AD disputes may have origins in private company matters, I don't think that they are privately run. In China, any AD dispute goes to MOFCOM first and then is settled in the WTO if necessary. Same thing in Australia with the AD Commission. These institutions effectively support their respective private claimants/defendants, but they are public institutions a… |
| label | r/internationaltrade |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/Internationaltrade |
| datetime | 2021-04-05 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakx6YUFOYW5PbjNyckVaZllNNzZSLVVlYkh2UUhKbDQyMEt1cE02VWVObmZTUUxQTEh0TjdGb2pvZEFJZFNLZi0zWnRZSHc5b0Z4MUFyOFF5eDdxTWZLMmc9PQ== |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9EQmMyT29sam9PblRQNjVlTnh1WnViaU5uUDdVR1JKZ3RCY1dqLTNxVWV0X0xBQ0dNTjA3LXN3TkJ6Z0pELXk5UHBCWHN5a2xfeXEybmpRRDNGdUJ6ZlVKcTZrSEZ2QkhPLVRyQ0FLSTFySzVPZEJuRm9nOGZnSEREN3hxU2xRRGlGOHBXdVFiaGh2R1JMUVl0eUdSS3BLNGdDQk9uVWlwRkFKd0VDNDhBcVZzb2ZRSDZDa3J3OER2Y292a2NCeHozYnVubE90RnF6MmpqVjFRdW1iZkZCY2VnRmVkbWJlMFlNRFpNdm9MMWIyOD0= |
Raw Record
{
"text": "Thanks for your response :) I genuinely didn't think anyone would answer.\n\nI agree that there are a lot of political matters at play. Whilst AD disputes may have origins in private company matters, I don't think that they are privately run. In China, any AD dispute goes to MOFCOM first and then is settled in the WTO if necessary. Same thing in Australia with the AD Commission. These institutions effectively support their respective private claimants/defendants, but they are public institutions and thus political in nature.\n\nBut, even if we had a strong dispute settlement body, I don't think that it would make trade policy much better. This is because of how time-consuming and costly settling the dispute actually is. If the law around AD was clearer and narrower, the imposition of a tariff would be more blatantly in breach of these provisions. The blatancy of such a breach might make private and public entities less likely to infringe these rules, thus proactively preventing ridiculous tariffs from being imposed under the guise of an AD duty (but this is up for debate).",
"label": "r/internationaltrade",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/Internationaltrade",
"datetime": "2021-04-05",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lakx6YUFOYW5PbjNyckVaZllNNzZSLVVlYkh2UUhKbDQyMEt1cE02VWVObmZTUUxQTEh0TjdGb2pvZEFJZFNLZi0zWnRZSHc5b0Z4MUFyOFF5eDdxTWZLMmc9PQ==",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9EQmMyT29sam9PblRQNjVlTnh1WnViaU5uUDdVR1JKZ3RCY1dqLTNxVWV0X0xBQ0dNTjA3LXN3TkJ6Z0pELXk5UHBCWHN5a2xfeXEybmpRRDNGdUJ6ZlVKcTZrSEZ2QkhPLVRyQ0FLSTFySzVPZEJuRm9nOGZnSEREN3hxU2xRRGlGOHBXdVFiaGh2R1JMUVl0eUdSS3BLNGdDQk9uVWlwRkFKd0VDNDhBcVZzb2ZRSDZDa3J3OER2Y292a2NCeHozYnVubE90RnF6MmpqVjFRdW1iZkZCY2VnRmVkbWJlMFlNRFpNdm9MMWIyOD0="
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 582
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000