Row 56132

Row ID: 56132 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 56132 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

>Preventing ownership of the venues by ticketing and promotion companies would also go a long way to ending the vertical monopoly.

I mean, I have zero objection to a theater ticketing an event themselves, even if they're the only one ticketing for it. It works for the few remaining independent movie theaters out there, and for the few independent music clubs. Where you run into issues is when someone controls *all* the medium-to-large theaters in a geographical location, *and* has exclusive control of the ticketing. At least one side of the equation needs to be fully broken up: a bunch of ticketing agencies competing on price for a few regional venue groups; or a bunch of independent venues competing to attract acts based on cuts and crowds, and a couple of ticketing platforms.

But, yes, ideally, every venue - regardless of size - would be independent and handle all of their own ticketing. Then they're competing for acts (which ensures artists get paid) and their competing for audiences (ensuring audiences don't get screwed on anyone other than the drinks and merch).

FieldValue
text >Preventing ownership of the venues by ticketing and promotion companies would also go a long way to ending the vertical monopoly.  I mean, I have zero objection to a theater ticketing an event themselves, even if they're the only one ticketing for it. It works for the few remaining independent movie theaters out there, and for the few independent music clubs. Where you run into issues is when someone controls *all* the medium-to-large theaters in a geographical location, *and* has exclusive co…
label r/news
dataType comment
communityName r/news
datetime 2024-05-23
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1XZm9RQURHcldzOGRCay13TEp0R1NsVFJ1U0VCckl3MUl5TFIxZ2J6R19CbGhKT1N6aGd2YWhhMTQ1NW4xUU1uMG5EalExRG9PSVdyaS0ydGwtVGNhZHc9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9tSVNISTZDd1p2cU1QM2JCLW9nMjhDNnEweDVZcTlqRVVHUUs1MlRPZUZIbXZ5SE40d1RJRnRYTmYxdU5SMXhsZzVSTC1HU1lzUXdEaThZVnRtTTd1UTUxTm1nOVNfV2RCYmRXY1plRFNoeGhzWXh6VWlLUmdtUmlfbzZRd3hQRkdka1U1Z0tMZXVVQmVJbi1rVDlVdXJudVZVSGoyLXRZRXFhNWh5RGRnTTNVMGF1QzFRVVBidlpKTjByYk13WGpm

Raw Record

{
  "text": "\n>Preventing ownership of the venues by ticketing and promotion companies would also go a long way to ending the vertical monopoly. \n\nI mean, I have zero objection to a theater ticketing an event themselves, even if they're the only one ticketing for it. It works for the few remaining independent movie theaters out there, and for the few independent music clubs. Where you run into issues is when someone controls *all* the medium-to-large theaters in a geographical location, *and* has exclusive control of the ticketing. At least one side of the equation needs to be fully broken up: a bunch of ticketing agencies competing on price for a few regional venue groups; or a bunch of independent venues competing to attract acts based on cuts and crowds, and a couple of ticketing platforms. \n\nBut, yes, ideally, every venue - regardless of size - would be independent and handle all of their own ticketing. Then they're competing for acts (which ensures artists get paid) and their competing for audiences (ensuring audiences don't get screwed on anyone other than the drinks and merch).",
  "label": "r/news",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/news",
  "datetime": "2024-05-23",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1XZm9RQURHcldzOGRCay13TEp0R1NsVFJ1U0VCckl3MUl5TFIxZ2J6R19CbGhKT1N6aGd2YWhhMTQ1NW4xUU1uMG5EalExRG9PSVdyaS0ydGwtVGNhZHc9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9tSVNISTZDd1p2cU1QM2JCLW9nMjhDNnEweDVZcTlqRVVHUUs1MlRPZUZIbXZ5SE40d1RJRnRYTmYxdU5SMXhsZzVSTC1HU1lzUXdEaThZVnRtTTd1UTUxTm1nOVNfV2RCYmRXY1plRFNoeGhzWXh6VWlLUmdtUmlfbzZRd3hQRkdka1U1Z0tMZXVVQmVJbi1rVDlVdXJudVZVSGoyLXRZRXFhNWh5RGRnTTNVMGF1QzFRVVBidlpKTjByYk13WGpm"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information