Row 55961

Row ID: 55961 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 55961 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

> In this scenario, AA is obligated to get the passenger to their destination, which they did. At most, AA should refund the ticket.

I’d argue that not being recorded (by their employee) while using the restroom (on their plane) is part of that flight contract.

> The company should also be allowed to sue the employee for the cost to redo the roof.

Because the customers paid AA for the service, would it not make logical sense to sue AA then? AA is free to sue the pedo to recuperate their cost.

Isn’t just the fact a customer paid AA for something, that is improperly executed in their opinion, a reasonable justification to sue AA? You can argue that the restroom situation is outside the scope of AA’s responsibility when they sell their tickets. That might be true, but that’s the job for the lawyers to argue in court.

FieldValue
text > In this scenario, AA is obligated to get the passenger to their destination, which they did. At most, AA should refund the ticket. I’d argue that not being recorded (by their employee) while using the restroom (on their plane) is part of that flight contract. > The company should also be allowed to sue the employee for the cost to redo the roof. Because the customers paid AA for the service, would it not make logical sense to sue AA then? AA is free to sue the pedo to recuperate their cost…
label r/news
dataType comment
communityName r/news
datetime 2024-05-23
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1XT2FJRG8xSjBSQktqcmRCdHc3VzBIaXB2OGUwOHFIaTNYYnE2eW1YVHViZkljc2pVNWpUX25jN0dTdS1GaDFLMUNVMG5URDZITXQyZV9MRGZBSTZfT0E9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9sb0lfYllDWnBqVjczQ3lISVAxOVJRT2hucldKc2trN2V4VW5neWEwaExhbVh4WmxJV0w4VWhVS1huTFNTeFB4Z2ZjSmRQcG1OVzd5RlFId2tqdkxCVEJwdWFzV2wyQTdPNXBYVl9yaXRnUkZhcm96TVRJbzUzbEFORFFkbThLbkoySmVDaUl1ZDlMLWRRdnhBUUtuNmRDUmZSVHNqWjFGc3B5NXMtQkpkVlZuX1NSSzdPaWJCcDlBN1Zic3huMU1oQ3pGTktYeGVuNFY5clFMVkdoam5SZz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "> In this scenario, AA is obligated to get the passenger to their destination, which they did. At most, AA should refund the ticket.\n\nI’d argue that not being recorded (by their employee) while using the restroom (on their plane) is part of that flight contract. \n\n> The company should also be allowed to sue the employee for the cost to redo the roof.\n\nBecause the customers paid AA for the service, would it not make logical sense to sue AA then? AA is free to sue the pedo to recuperate their cost. \n\nIsn’t just the fact a customer paid AA for something, that is improperly executed in their opinion, a reasonable justification to sue AA? You can argue that the restroom situation is outside the scope of AA’s responsibility when they sell their tickets. That might be true, but that’s the job for the lawyers to argue in court.",
  "label": "r/news",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/news",
  "datetime": "2024-05-23",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1XT2FJRG8xSjBSQktqcmRCdHc3VzBIaXB2OGUwOHFIaTNYYnE2eW1YVHViZkljc2pVNWpUX25jN0dTdS1GaDFLMUNVMG5URDZITXQyZV9MRGZBSTZfT0E9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9sb0lfYllDWnBqVjczQ3lISVAxOVJRT2hucldKc2trN2V4VW5neWEwaExhbVh4WmxJV0w4VWhVS1huTFNTeFB4Z2ZjSmRQcG1OVzd5RlFId2tqdkxCVEJwdWFzV2wyQTdPNXBYVl9yaXRnUkZhcm96TVRJbzUzbEFORFFkbThLbkoySmVDaUl1ZDlMLWRRdnhBUUtuNmRDUmZSVHNqWjFGc3B5NXMtQkpkVlZuX1NSSzdPaWJCcDlBN1Zic3huMU1oQ3pGTktYeGVuNFY5clFMVkdoam5SZz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information