Row 53577
Content Data
This page contains data entry 53577 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
> Furthermore, I would think a victim of such attacks would not want to proudly come online, even anonymously, and claiming they still control 5k BTC like I do. So, really, any attacker with half a brain should be realizing I am not one of their current victims.
No, I'm saying that OG who haven't yet been attacked could be mistaken for you, in which case if a criminal had decided that person had no Bitcoin left, now they may have a reason to correlate you with some other early OG and decide to *start* harassing them.
> Even your own comments here prove my point: you are giving me some great insights (thanks!) which I would otherwise not have received, had I not signed with 500 BTC.
People like myself are more than willing to offer simple advice to people who genuinely ask, no signature needed. The reason I'm in here giving warnings is because the signature was entirely unnecessary. Even gmax (who scumbags tend to confuse me with) in my experience has *gladly* provided extremely high-value advice for people in situations similar (but not identical) to yours. In essence, what you're doing is a *small* indirect threat to people like myself, and no offence, and I'm convinced you didn't *mean* it that way, but like "you don't have to do that to get us to talk to you." :-) Did you try reaching out?
One other issue that comes to mind is that descendants can.. just make more descendants, right. Thus, a gold-digger who wants more disbursements can just make like ten kids—even unbeknownst to your legit descendants—and then just wait until they're 35 and *surprise* do a genetic test. Now they're "stealing" money from kids your kids *intended* to have.
The sub-fork splits can also be gamed similarly, and just makes upper-tier descendants with small numbers of children higher-value targets.
You haven't yet commented on why if you are a believer in Bitcoin, you would want to remove Bitcoin as an inheritance from your descendants—why make it harder for them to participate in the system which built your family in the first place? Reconsider that—Bitcoin may end up just taking over large chunks of the world, and participating in that might be important.
Finally, again I'd like to stress that when you say you want to try using share-splitting to make it so numbers of your relatives can combine to build recovery keys—family and acquaintances do really, really weird things when large amounts of money are an incentive for them. Have you read the lottery winner statistics? In essence you're the equivalent of a lottery winner right now who just hasn't been publically announced. Or, especially, family members are now targets too right. The more people who know about you, the less likely it is your secret doesn't get widely distributed.
Again, I'd like to stress more strongly: **If you sign any more messages you are making a mistake.** We'll talk to you anyway bruv, without the signature. Right now the signing is ambiguous and the likelihood of one thing or another is diffuse amongst a relatively large-ish pile of early miners. You don't need at all to sign more concretely. We're already talking to you. :-(
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | > Furthermore, I would think a victim of such attacks would not want to proudly come online, even anonymously, and claiming they still control 5k BTC like I do. So, really, any attacker with half a brain should be realizing I am not one of their current victims. No, I'm saying that OG who haven't yet been attacked could be mistaken for you, in which case if a criminal had decided that person had no Bitcoin left, now they may have a reason to correlate you with some other early OG and decide to … |
| label | r/bitcoin |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/Bitcoin |
| datetime | 2024-05-22 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1VeUN6anotcWU2VE1GdTZ2NVo4bXNGc1FwX2d0cGs0MGdjLUU3SDFpSkdxeTB1R3llTXdIWjZFTi01RFIycjk4cm5WVFNTQ2tTaEJ3S1Z3Mm15N3VScGc9PQ== |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9rcmdsb2JTcUVIWXFsZGFQZkdtT0FjWUxocVhmUzYxVW1xS2tSQ1h2UjZ6SXZqWXdlLVBxRFFuVFg3MDRQbzEzN2l5U3Q0SEs3d0FOem91bEhEMzVRTm80RXdqajd3NHR6UUNlYUo1LW81RGdya2QydE10ZEhQeTZSS3p6U2xGZ25ldlkzUDB1WlRleEhmVkhRVUdZU3dnd0dLSUdkLXF6dm1vYkRLVmhOY0tyVUVnSVE0Tk9CREpaWE10VlBhN3JqS0xkZy1fbXFhNHFXTGhMVGdRSWhvQT09 |
Raw Record
{
"text": "> Furthermore, I would think a victim of such attacks would not want to proudly come online, even anonymously, and claiming they still control 5k BTC like I do. So, really, any attacker with half a brain should be realizing I am not one of their current victims.\n\nNo, I'm saying that OG who haven't yet been attacked could be mistaken for you, in which case if a criminal had decided that person had no Bitcoin left, now they may have a reason to correlate you with some other early OG and decide to *start* harassing them.\n\n> Even your own comments here prove my point: you are giving me some great insights (thanks!) which I would otherwise not have received, had I not signed with 500 BTC.\n\nPeople like myself are more than willing to offer simple advice to people who genuinely ask, no signature needed. The reason I'm in here giving warnings is because the signature was entirely unnecessary. Even gmax (who scumbags tend to confuse me with) in my experience has *gladly* provided extremely high-value advice for people in situations similar (but not identical) to yours. In essence, what you're doing is a *small* indirect threat to people like myself, and no offence, and I'm convinced you didn't *mean* it that way, but like \"you don't have to do that to get us to talk to you.\" :-) Did you try reaching out?\n\nOne other issue that comes to mind is that descendants can.. just make more descendants, right. Thus, a gold-digger who wants more disbursements can just make like ten kids—even unbeknownst to your legit descendants—and then just wait until they're 35 and *surprise* do a genetic test. Now they're \"stealing\" money from kids your kids *intended* to have.\n\nThe sub-fork splits can also be gamed similarly, and just makes upper-tier descendants with small numbers of children higher-value targets.\n\nYou haven't yet commented on why if you are a believer in Bitcoin, you would want to remove Bitcoin as an inheritance from your descendants—why make it harder for them to participate in the system which built your family in the first place? Reconsider that—Bitcoin may end up just taking over large chunks of the world, and participating in that might be important.\n\nFinally, again I'd like to stress that when you say you want to try using share-splitting to make it so numbers of your relatives can combine to build recovery keys—family and acquaintances do really, really weird things when large amounts of money are an incentive for them. Have you read the lottery winner statistics? In essence you're the equivalent of a lottery winner right now who just hasn't been publically announced. Or, especially, family members are now targets too right. The more people who know about you, the less likely it is your secret doesn't get widely distributed.\n\nAgain, I'd like to stress more strongly: **If you sign any more messages you are making a mistake.** We'll talk to you anyway bruv, without the signature. Right now the signing is ambiguous and the likelihood of one thing or another is diffuse amongst a relatively large-ish pile of early miners. You don't need at all to sign more concretely. We're already talking to you. :-(",
"label": "r/bitcoin",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/Bitcoin",
"datetime": "2024-05-22",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1VeUN6anotcWU2VE1GdTZ2NVo4bXNGc1FwX2d0cGs0MGdjLUU3SDFpSkdxeTB1R3llTXdIWjZFTi01RFIycjk4cm5WVFNTQ2tTaEJ3S1Z3Mm15N3VScGc9PQ==",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9rcmdsb2JTcUVIWXFsZGFQZkdtT0FjWUxocVhmUzYxVW1xS2tSQ1h2UjZ6SXZqWXdlLVBxRFFuVFg3MDRQbzEzN2l5U3Q0SEs3d0FOem91bEhEMzVRTm80RXdqajd3NHR6UUNlYUo1LW81RGdya2QydE10ZEhQeTZSS3p6U2xGZ25ldlkzUDB1WlRleEhmVkhRVUdZU3dnd0dLSUdkLXF6dm1vYkRLVmhOY0tyVUVnSVE0Tk9CREpaWE10VlBhN3JqS0xkZy1fbXFhNHFXTGhMVGdRSWhvQT09"
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 53577
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000