Row 51766

Row ID: 51766 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 51766 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

The "originalists" literally disregarded the legal concept of standing, against the wishes of the injured party, and said that the law was not Intended to be used this way (and didn't let the words of the architect of the actual law that was passed, who said it was OK, contradict their "logic").

Sotomayor's dissent pretty accurately describes how the Republicans on the court act against the text and intent of the law in question, disregarding the concept of standing, because the majority on the court didn't like the policy (but has to intent a legal reason for it to be stopped).

https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/06/Kagan-dissent-Biden-Nebraska.pdf

So, yes, the Conservative justices lied, glad we're on the same page.

FieldValue
text The "originalists" literally disregarded the legal concept of standing, against the wishes of the injured party, and said that the law was not Intended to be used this way (and didn't let the words of the architect of the actual law that was passed, who said it was OK, contradict their "logic"). Sotomayor's dissent pretty accurately describes how the Republicans on the court act against the text and intent of the law in question, disregarding the concept of standing, because the majority on the…
label r/politics
dataType comment
communityName r/politics
datetime 2024-05-22
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1URkdsODVJblZZczlaSWdCZFNGejZJT1ZiRE5TTDZMREktOF90NjNPT2ItYWRub0JpQnZCREoyanRCX2pIenFISmVyTW5MTjgtSEJlQnVUTTkydXZoS2c9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9qWExVem9tQ25JaGItb3hXdHNGZm11T1JONDVYRkNtdnAydHA4Z0Q4TVo5V3MwUHdNVGhCaGM4TmcxUFhmTG1TTVJTTkJ5MW9CSVJSd1NtRkhZdmNUUkdyZGZwR21GdENuZXRwX3BsOUtIb1ZtY0ZGenF2QzJMckJKNkhPRGd4emFuRXoxOWpsYkxWckI5dzJzSjJJSkxuTFBqcVpFQ21kZk1jbjV5UGtxN0dScTRGdjJQd2NjRTBjYXU4WV8yZjZnT2FZcThzZjVIaE9kaUYyUThiLTM5QT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "The \"originalists\" literally disregarded the legal concept of standing, against the wishes of the injured party, and said that the law was not Intended to be used this way (and didn't let the words of the architect of the actual law that was passed, who said it was OK, contradict their \"logic\").\n\nSotomayor's dissent pretty accurately describes how the Republicans on the court act against the text and intent of the law in question, disregarding the concept of standing, because the majority on the court didn't like the policy (but has to intent a legal reason for it to be stopped).\n\nhttps://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/06/Kagan-dissent-Biden-Nebraska.pdf\n\nSo, yes, the Conservative justices lied, glad we're on the same page.",
  "label": "r/politics",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/politics",
  "datetime": "2024-05-22",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1URkdsODVJblZZczlaSWdCZFNGejZJT1ZiRE5TTDZMREktOF90NjNPT2ItYWRub0JpQnZCREoyanRCX2pIenFISmVyTW5MTjgtSEJlQnVUTTkydXZoS2c9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9qWExVem9tQ25JaGItb3hXdHNGZm11T1JONDVYRkNtdnAydHA4Z0Q4TVo5V3MwUHdNVGhCaGM4TmcxUFhmTG1TTVJTTkJ5MW9CSVJSd1NtRkhZdmNUUkdyZGZwR21GdENuZXRwX3BsOUtIb1ZtY0ZGenF2QzJMckJKNkhPRGd4emFuRXoxOWpsYkxWckI5dzJzSjJJSkxuTFBqcVpFQ21kZk1jbjV5UGtxN0dScTRGdjJQd2NjRTBjYXU4WV8yZjZnT2FZcThzZjVIaE9kaUYyUThiLTM5QT09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information