Row 51481

Row ID: 51481 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 51481 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

While it's only as persuasive as you'd like it to be, the United States' position in this case seems to be that the 16th amendment's use of the word "income" does not necessarily mean "realized gains." The idea of realized gains are a product of the tax code (which i'm sure you know as you say you're a lawyer). Lower court seemed to agree with the US opinion.

US Brief in Moore: [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-800/267027/20230516164014148\_22-800%20Moore%20v.%20USA.pdf](https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-800/267027/20230516164014148_22-800%20Moore%20v.%20USA.pdf)

FieldValue
text While it's only as persuasive as you'd like it to be, the United States' position in this case seems to be that the 16th amendment's use of the word "income" does not necessarily mean "realized gains." The idea of realized gains are a product of the tax code (which i'm sure you know as you say you're a lawyer). Lower court seemed to agree with the US opinion. US Brief in Moore: [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-800/267027/20230516164014148\_22-800%20Moore%20v.%20USA.pdf](https://ww…
label r/economics
dataType comment
communityName r/Economics
datetime 2024-05-22
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1UTUZHOG9aeWpzc3ZyOGJMWkYtSWpJRHgtdF9ITzhPWDBjWXlhVEVNWWxPY0NMQWZhWEhKNldhRDBXMjE2SGhRRzhEc2dQeHFOalhXNTh1NDNKMXhiOFE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9pdGhXZHJsYTNLREoxSkRIVkY2ZC1xQ2RnTXZ5N3RQMUtwUlE1eklsbTE0enJKWVM1Znh6S1QxcS1PNFU5Q2VLLVJNNVZ6UE53Z1VPSktTZ0E4Z0RTdlZFWkRhZWxacHJEMXQxNHpxVnY5ODB0eVVUbFhaNTVTei1pMUVYWmJNc0tvMGNoMGV6ZlE4aGY4Y1hvODhuSkJuaUpsQ2drQW9YdGxFNXlaWkJTMi1NcmtVTXYzNFJfUVA4bnV4ZTdrbzNzQjVMY05hRDFxN1Q4RjJtVU5oSUNYZz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "While it's only as persuasive as you'd like it to be, the United States' position in this case seems to be that the 16th amendment's use of the word \"income\" does not necessarily mean \"realized gains.\" The idea of realized gains are a product of the tax code (which i'm sure you know as you say you're a lawyer). Lower court seemed to agree with the US opinion. \n\nUS Brief in Moore: [https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-800/267027/20230516164014148\\_22-800%20Moore%20v.%20USA.pdf](https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-800/267027/20230516164014148_22-800%20Moore%20v.%20USA.pdf)",
  "label": "r/economics",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/Economics",
  "datetime": "2024-05-22",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1UTUZHOG9aeWpzc3ZyOGJMWkYtSWpJRHgtdF9ITzhPWDBjWXlhVEVNWWxPY0NMQWZhWEhKNldhRDBXMjE2SGhRRzhEc2dQeHFOalhXNTh1NDNKMXhiOFE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9pdGhXZHJsYTNLREoxSkRIVkY2ZC1xQ2RnTXZ5N3RQMUtwUlE1eklsbTE0enJKWVM1Znh6S1QxcS1PNFU5Q2VLLVJNNVZ6UE53Z1VPSktTZ0E4Z0RTdlZFWkRhZWxacHJEMXQxNHpxVnY5ODB0eVVUbFhaNTVTei1pMUVYWmJNc0tvMGNoMGV6ZlE4aGY4Y1hvODhuSkJuaUpsQ2drQW9YdGxFNXlaWkJTMi1NcmtVTXYzNFJfUVA4bnV4ZTdrbzNzQjVMY05hRDFxN1Q4RjJtVU5oSUNYZz09"
}

Entry Information