Row 51044
Content Data
This page contains data entry 51044 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
What are you talking about? Logically, the scale should start at zero, so she had zero husbands until her first one. If you allow negative numbers, then she would have had negative husbands , which makes absolutely no sense.
And I don't get how this would be in any way related to her age. Or are you saying that negative husbands are still husbands? Let's assume that she married at age 18, that would mean that she had 6584 husbands at birth.
Also, if number of marriages over time was a linear regression, wouldn't that mean that each marriage is roughly equal in length? Surely that's not the case. I could see that people who marry often will have shorter marriages, but that's gotta completely random.
Idk maybe I'm missing something but both of your conclusions seem like a massive stretch.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | What are you talking about? Logically, the scale should start at zero, so she had zero husbands until her first one. If you allow negative numbers, then she would have had negative husbands , which makes absolutely no sense. And I don't get how this would be in any way related to her age. Or are you saying that negative husbands are still husbands? Let's assume that she married at age 18, that would mean that she had 6584 husbands at birth. Also, if number of marriages over time was a linear r… |
| label | r/openai |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/OpenAI |
| datetime | 2024-05-22 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1Ta3ZMNVA1SDJqMXNSSmNLdXFVNzJ4cmNPNFljN3FmcjJZbW5jX2FZLXkxN1FnTjNSbXJURFdLVW4wdkpvLWF0b0FUVk9OLTB6dUliU1ZibXJIcnVlaXc9PQ== |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9pb29FbG9QTEhVVHp5S1ZLMTR5S2FFLTFCQVpnc2ZhaXF6NjZCREI3Qk5INkVFY2xKcnFlT0kyUnIzRDdfcFRBcDN0bUdaS3VvMFJKaVBhNk9sVW1MT2VYb0tvQ3JfMmh3eTlPWHhxTkhUSEJIcUMtYnhHWGM1b2dVdlc0LTFRZ3VBR1NWNGFDN0dMWjNGZzU2Q2ZxNG5UTnZVcWVaZUJSNjJ0TVJrWDlVNEU1TmVORHlRUkhLMG9ZS3g1UDBzZWY2Y0UzMTBHamhZUWtCREU3V2VrOTFaZz09 |
Raw Record
{
"text": "What are you talking about? Logically, the scale should start at zero, so she had zero husbands until her first one. If you allow negative numbers, then she would have had negative husbands , which makes absolutely no sense.\n\nAnd I don't get how this would be in any way related to her age. Or are you saying that negative husbands are still husbands? Let's assume that she married at age 18, that would mean that she had 6584 husbands at birth.\n\nAlso, if number of marriages over time was a linear regression, wouldn't that mean that each marriage is roughly equal in length? Surely that's not the case. I could see that people who marry often will have shorter marriages, but that's gotta completely random.\n\nIdk maybe I'm missing something but both of your conclusions seem like a massive stretch.",
"label": "r/openai",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/OpenAI",
"datetime": "2024-05-22",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1Ta3ZMNVA1SDJqMXNSSmNLdXFVNzJ4cmNPNFljN3FmcjJZbW5jX2FZLXkxN1FnTjNSbXJURFdLVW4wdkpvLWF0b0FUVk9OLTB6dUliU1ZibXJIcnVlaXc9PQ==",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9pb29FbG9QTEhVVHp5S1ZLMTR5S2FFLTFCQVpnc2ZhaXF6NjZCREI3Qk5INkVFY2xKcnFlT0kyUnIzRDdfcFRBcDN0bUdaS3VvMFJKaVBhNk9sVW1MT2VYb0tvQ3JfMmh3eTlPWHhxTkhUSEJIcUMtYnhHWGM1b2dVdlc0LTFRZ3VBR1NWNGFDN0dMWjNGZzU2Q2ZxNG5UTnZVcWVaZUJSNjJ0TVJrWDlVNEU1TmVORHlRUkhLMG9ZS3g1UDBzZWY2Y0UzMTBHamhZUWtCREU3V2VrOTFaZz09"
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 51044
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000