Row 49694
Content Data
This page contains data entry 49694 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
Bunker buster tech has developed quite a lot since the cold war, we've probably got conventional ones that'd do it. There are around 20 B2's and 60 plus B52s, and I'm not an expert but I'm fairly sure we have bunker busters that an F35 can carry. And I wouldn't be at all surprised if there were some capabilities floating around that aren't widely known.
Regardless, you are telling me that a country that can't keep a bunch of APCs in working order or train a competent Army has been uncharacteristically hypercompetent with a vastly more complex ICBM/Nuke logistics with that 15-1700 nukes it is alleged to have ready to go? That their anti aircraft or anti missile shields look anything like the Wests? You think their subs aren't shadowed at all times? You think the US after the cold war and planning for the Iranian and Chinese buried nuke arsenals hasn't planned some shit to deal with some half flooded poorly maintainted piece of shit silos?
Frankly Russia has always been overestimated, not underestimated, which is why they do the theatrics like poisoning folks or pushing them out of windows. They know that their reputation is kind of all they have.
Iraq had the 5th largest military on earth, using mostly russian weaponry. And they were demolished during the gulf war in days. Russia wouldn't fare much better, and if the most they can do is make other countries suffer in their dying, that's not exactly a position of strength.
12 subs, 120 silos, theoretically like 90 mobile units. That's it. That's not nothing. The subs and mobile units might be a problem. But I'd be very surprised if they have any functioning fusion bombs at this point, and if 2/3rds of what they have deployed are functional. The cost to maintain and modernize strategic nukes is massive, and due to corruptions and bullshit and their status as basically a broke assed developing nation I bet they've cut one too many corners.
I suspect the US has not. And the longer it goes the less danger Russia will be.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | Bunker buster tech has developed quite a lot since the cold war, we've probably got conventional ones that'd do it. There are around 20 B2's and 60 plus B52s, and I'm not an expert but I'm fairly sure we have bunker busters that an F35 can carry. And I wouldn't be at all surprised if there were some capabilities floating around that aren't widely known. Regardless, you are telling me that a country that can't keep a bunch of APCs in working order or train a competent Army has been uncharacteri… |
| label | r/worldnews |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/worldnews |
| datetime | 2024-05-22 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1TS3hkTkU2U1ZISkhTR0FzSW5STU5ELVl2N1J5N0lGcVN2dHYzbU5zOFRrX3VZbHduUHc0TzFRV3kzd0N4M1NaajVnRi15RGN3WEJHSlkwTmdJU0N3eHc9PQ== |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9oajFabzBSX3pzT0ZxQU4wN0NhMjRsY0s4TjJDZ1ZIcnY4eHUzUlhtdk5sa3plT1E1ZWl5bmJmakRNYmNvNXF0RWFqZ2xGMklHaV9OOWlxb3BRWl9wcVNYX1ZlWmdmM0ZJRWQwRzQ3ZU9NZFlDYTIySk5hd1Vvc2NkbzA2Mlo1ZXlwSXZ6M3Z5NFVtLVJVM09QS2dSSXFzVnBXN1VPdzJIZE0yQVFsQmgxcENOLWdQYUZpNUdUUUFLTXRGLW5Sc2VKdnQ2RnlQbzBxZXNfUXJVeTRsU2pYQT09 |
Raw Record
{
"text": "Bunker buster tech has developed quite a lot since the cold war, we've probably got conventional ones that'd do it. There are around 20 B2's and 60 plus B52s, and I'm not an expert but I'm fairly sure we have bunker busters that an F35 can carry. And I wouldn't be at all surprised if there were some capabilities floating around that aren't widely known. \n\nRegardless, you are telling me that a country that can't keep a bunch of APCs in working order or train a competent Army has been uncharacteristically hypercompetent with a vastly more complex ICBM/Nuke logistics with that 15-1700 nukes it is alleged to have ready to go? That their anti aircraft or anti missile shields look anything like the Wests? You think their subs aren't shadowed at all times? You think the US after the cold war and planning for the Iranian and Chinese buried nuke arsenals hasn't planned some shit to deal with some half flooded poorly maintainted piece of shit silos?\n\nFrankly Russia has always been overestimated, not underestimated, which is why they do the theatrics like poisoning folks or pushing them out of windows. They know that their reputation is kind of all they have. \n\nIraq had the 5th largest military on earth, using mostly russian weaponry. And they were demolished during the gulf war in days. Russia wouldn't fare much better, and if the most they can do is make other countries suffer in their dying, that's not exactly a position of strength.\n\n12 subs, 120 silos, theoretically like 90 mobile units. That's it. That's not nothing. The subs and mobile units might be a problem. But I'd be very surprised if they have any functioning fusion bombs at this point, and if 2/3rds of what they have deployed are functional. The cost to maintain and modernize strategic nukes is massive, and due to corruptions and bullshit and their status as basically a broke assed developing nation I bet they've cut one too many corners. \n\nI suspect the US has not. And the longer it goes the less danger Russia will be.",
"label": "r/worldnews",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/worldnews",
"datetime": "2024-05-22",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1TS3hkTkU2U1ZISkhTR0FzSW5STU5ELVl2N1J5N0lGcVN2dHYzbU5zOFRrX3VZbHduUHc0TzFRV3kzd0N4M1NaajVnRi15RGN3WEJHSlkwTmdJU0N3eHc9PQ==",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9oajFabzBSX3pzT0ZxQU4wN0NhMjRsY0s4TjJDZ1ZIcnY4eHUzUlhtdk5sa3plT1E1ZWl5bmJmakRNYmNvNXF0RWFqZ2xGMklHaV9OOWlxb3BRWl9wcVNYX1ZlWmdmM0ZJRWQwRzQ3ZU9NZFlDYTIySk5hd1Vvc2NkbzA2Mlo1ZXlwSXZ6M3Z5NFVtLVJVM09QS2dSSXFzVnBXN1VPdzJIZE0yQVFsQmgxcENOLWdQYUZpNUdUUUFLTXRGLW5Sc2VKdnQ2RnlQbzBxZXNfUXJVeTRsU2pYQT09"
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 49694
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000