Row 47930

Row ID: 47930 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 47930 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

The point is to create a scenario where "legal responsibility" doesn't exist anywhere in the process. The legal system doesn't operate with the assumption that someone *must* be guilty of a crime. If someone dies that doesn't necessarily mean that someone *must* have murdered them and we just need to figure out who to pin that on. In this scenario API documentation would be generated without the person ever reading the legally-protected code themselves, so if it's the reading of the code that is the "crime" it's not being performed by any person that could be convicted of it.

It may be that you could argue that he's *causing* it to be read, and criminalize that act itself - analogous to how hiring a hitman is illegal too. But that would make existing legal reverse-engineering practices illegal too, where one may hire a programmer to go and generate the API documentation for a *different* programmer to use in writing a clean-room implementation. I think that would cause more problems than it "solves."

FieldValue
text The point is to create a scenario where "legal responsibility" doesn't exist anywhere in the process. The legal system doesn't operate with the assumption that someone *must* be guilty of a crime. If someone dies that doesn't necessarily mean that someone *must* have murdered them and we just need to figure out who to pin that on. In this scenario API documentation would be generated without the person ever reading the legally-protected code themselves, so if it's the reading of the code that is…
label r/machinelearning
dataType comment
communityName r/MachineLearning
datetime 2024-05-22
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1SdDBnQkp2Q2tWRloyYkpvcDZ5VDNYODltelJmSmdjYW05czhLQlk4V2htRVUyVkNFcVN3ZTJNbjJpYXdGeWtlMGU4R1NKWHlnVkphbjFPMGxkUlI3TVE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9ncVBnc2p2QmpJWXFXM3I1aVVFa1pJTFNrcmxGUkJIS3dLMjdlbUx3LWVQSUdHODJrbUFDVW1fdVQyUElSdV9aY3FWNDBxNE0yYk9rMmFTa0ZVczRWV3FOcERXSEJOeWI1ZmhISDBkR3FRSVJKVWpQbGdaZVlPSzNiNkpOakJtcHUtdVNqUGVzakt3c2tBTGJNcTJaT1RXeXphYkdKa0R0cGdvWFhRampSSVNtczZGci1oeUhnbTNiMGVEVFlNZVhpSmZENC16Mk4yeFFaUHBlTXNmNExUQT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "The point is to create a scenario where \"legal responsibility\" doesn't exist anywhere in the process. The legal system doesn't operate with the assumption that someone *must* be guilty of a crime. If someone dies that doesn't necessarily mean that someone *must* have murdered them and we just need to figure out who to pin that on. In this scenario API documentation would be generated without the person ever reading the legally-protected code themselves, so if it's the reading of the code that is the \"crime\" it's not being performed by any person that could be convicted of it.\n\nIt may be that you could argue that he's *causing* it to be read, and criminalize that act itself - analogous to how hiring a hitman is illegal too. But that would make existing legal reverse-engineering practices  illegal too, where one may hire a programmer to go and generate the API documentation for a *different* programmer to use in writing a clean-room implementation. I think that would cause more problems than it \"solves.\"",
  "label": "r/machinelearning",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/MachineLearning",
  "datetime": "2024-05-22",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1SdDBnQkp2Q2tWRloyYkpvcDZ5VDNYODltelJmSmdjYW05czhLQlk4V2htRVUyVkNFcVN3ZTJNbjJpYXdGeWtlMGU4R1NKWHlnVkphbjFPMGxkUlI3TVE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9ncVBnc2p2QmpJWXFXM3I1aVVFa1pJTFNrcmxGUkJIS3dLMjdlbUx3LWVQSUdHODJrbUFDVW1fdVQyUElSdV9aY3FWNDBxNE0yYk9rMmFTa0ZVczRWV3FOcERXSEJOeWI1ZmhISDBkR3FRSVJKVWpQbGdaZVlPSzNiNkpOakJtcHUtdVNqUGVzakt3c2tBTGJNcTJaT1RXeXphYkdKa0R0cGdvWFhRampSSVNtczZGci1oeUhnbTNiMGVEVFlNZVhpSmZENC16Mk4yeFFaUHBlTXNmNExUQT09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information