Row 40479

Row ID: 40479 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 40479 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Again, you definitely don't have to convince me it sucks. I don't want machines learning this stuff and teaching it to me, I want the discovery for myself, literally. Me or someone else, some other poor bastard grad researcher with a TEM, an AFM, and nothing else to live for. Not an algorithm. And we're actually pretty far away from that still too, machine learning cracked Navier-Stokes but that was welcome because it's Navier-Stokes(edit:they still had to make it do Fourier analysis), and it can come up with drugs. But yeah, I want the insight, I've been chasing it all my life.

But we didn't learn reason by learning how a calculator works. Maybe we'll learn some new tricks with matrices but beyond that, it isn't for that. And if you actually want to understand it, you don't look at it, you do math on it. Are you a PhD level mathematician? To understand even one single trained neural net, you would have to work on that problem alone for *years* and you might end up *nowhere*. No one's going to do that because again, it's completely beside the point.

FieldValue
text Again, you definitely don't have to convince me it sucks. I don't want machines learning this stuff and teaching it to me, I want the discovery for myself, literally. Me or someone else, some other poor bastard grad researcher with a TEM, an AFM, and nothing else to live for. Not an algorithm. And we're actually pretty far away from that still too, machine learning cracked Navier-Stokes but that was welcome because it's Navier-Stokes(edit:they still had to make it do Fourier analysis), and it ca…
label r/tech
dataType comment
communityName r/tech
datetime 2024-05-22
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1NUFN0TUlOOVNGRS1qYWg1bTVvU2JNOVpHX2ZuS1VTTEVoczhCcXdxODg4LXhUWnNWZnhkRUZlemZQd2xVYldHS2NGeWFoNnhidGtOVlJZQzlOTFJMM0E9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9iNWJRUHJ3Znhub3puSF9YMjRKRnVDbkF4ZWlrMVppbzl3SjJzeWhSN3FzRDJZQS1TdTFUdXAyYzQ4bmlVY3E0bGFrdVZ6VXp4NngxU2pPZ1p3SGJWMmFnS3ZGM1o3Z1JsZzREc2FGS01XQW5UNHlQTmN1M1FCdDVyOGtma2ZnUTFHcXdzYWJlQ2s0WGhRVnUwVEFfdXNXcXVxeno0ZUpwT3JQVUJsTjlVVlRYVVBXcUZIQlk1c3VOT3NFUVpraHk1TWNJcW5qVE0tbk1EV2hjdDNBUnpGdz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Again, you definitely don't have to convince me it sucks. I don't want machines learning this stuff and teaching it to me, I want the discovery for myself, literally. Me or someone else, some other poor bastard grad researcher with a TEM, an AFM, and nothing else to live for. Not an algorithm. And we're actually pretty far away from that still too, machine learning cracked Navier-Stokes but that was welcome because it's Navier-Stokes(edit:they still had to make it do Fourier analysis), and it can come up with drugs. But yeah, I want the insight, I've been chasing it all my life. \n\nBut we didn't learn reason by learning how a calculator works. Maybe we'll learn some new tricks with matrices but beyond that, it isn't for that. And if you actually want to understand it, you don't look at it, you do math on it. Are you a PhD level mathematician? To understand even one single trained neural net, you would have to work on that problem alone for *years* and you might end up *nowhere*. No one's going to do that because again, it's completely beside the point.",
  "label": "r/tech",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/tech",
  "datetime": "2024-05-22",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1NUFN0TUlOOVNGRS1qYWg1bTVvU2JNOVpHX2ZuS1VTTEVoczhCcXdxODg4LXhUWnNWZnhkRUZlemZQd2xVYldHS2NGeWFoNnhidGtOVlJZQzlOTFJMM0E9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9iNWJRUHJ3Znhub3puSF9YMjRKRnVDbkF4ZWlrMVppbzl3SjJzeWhSN3FzRDJZQS1TdTFUdXAyYzQ4bmlVY3E0bGFrdVZ6VXp4NngxU2pPZ1p3SGJWMmFnS3ZGM1o3Z1JsZzREc2FGS01XQW5UNHlQTmN1M1FCdDVyOGtma2ZnUTFHcXdzYWJlQ2s0WGhRVnUwVEFfdXNXcXVxeno0ZUpwT3JQVUJsTjlVVlRYVVBXcUZIQlk1c3VOT3NFUVpraHk1TWNJcW5qVE0tbk1EV2hjdDNBUnpGdz09"
}

Entry Information