Row 39685

Row ID: 39685 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 39685 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

>So did Coinbase and Bitmain and Kraken a ton of other companies at the time. Why don't they get the same hate that bitpay does?

Kraken did not support the S2X attack on Bitcoin. Coinbase does get the same hate.

>this seems to be an outdated argument

It is not outdated. BitPay does not even provide users with a bitcoin address to send bitcoin to. [Here is a working link that explains it all.](https://web.archive.org/web/20180111142553/https://blog.samouraiwallet.com/post/169222582782/bitpay-qr-codes-are-no-longer-valid-important)

>this is the way the industry is going.

Companies can use BTCPay Server to accept bitcoin payments, including lightning bitcoin payments, without forcing users to provide any of their personal information. Companies like The Bitcoin Company, Bitrefill, and Coincards sell gift cards for bitcoin without requiring users to provide any of their personal information.

>while also not being shut down like Charlie Shrem

Charlie Shrem was knowingly selling millions of dollars worth of bitcoin to someone named Robert Faiella that was money laundering and operating an unregistered money service business. Charlie Shrem knew that Robert Faiella was selling millions of dollars worth of bitcoin to Silk Road users that needed bitcoin to buy illegal items on the Silk Road marketplace. Charlie Shrem knew what Robert Faiella was doing. Sherm and Faiella discussed it through email. Sherm was not adhering to any AML procedures. Shrem did not file any reports when selling millions of dollars worth of bitcoin to Faiella.

FieldValue
text >So did Coinbase and Bitmain and Kraken a ton of other companies at the time. Why don't they get the same hate that bitpay does? Kraken did not support the S2X attack on Bitcoin. Coinbase does get the same hate. >this seems to be an outdated argument It is not outdated. BitPay does not even provide users with a bitcoin address to send bitcoin to. [Here is a working link that explains it all.](https://web.archive.org/web/20180111142553/https://blog.samouraiwallet.com/post/169222582782/bitpay-q…
label r/bitcoin
dataType comment
communityName r/Bitcoin
datetime 2024-05-22
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1MZDFId2JBNUJMTUVUOERzS20xN19sZHN5cW80RFB6Sm1EaWxtbzM2TlVuSUlCVTBrWHJKaEQ5eDZ1MjlWUHhzd0VyV3k5eExuLUJPYmlVcDNEajdfclE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9icUliaDlrWFB4M2U4VkVyUDBuaHJjSHJib2xKWVZ3T1RaSnBuZTFjM015TktfaFZSeUdhT3RkZExabGpIOVVjU0EzZGpQempwMWNGcjRtVFM5WUlRSHJFSFVpaEtTVlZ6NUx4bTd3VzZEUXo5LTBCc19HSjhKZWdtNGNBZkxWYlJIWDNNYmxMMDBWdnozaUt3U21UWXdNb3RpNjdlM0l1MTdneXhBVldKVGt0bXdHd0RxOWRBWWZ1TEhPT0htSVB5WXF1QjhjcWdfdnpsQ2tQNk56eFZGZz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": ">So did Coinbase and Bitmain and Kraken a ton of other companies at the time. Why don't they get the same hate that bitpay does?\n\nKraken did not support the S2X attack on Bitcoin. Coinbase does get the same hate.\n\n>this seems to be an outdated argument\n\nIt is not outdated. BitPay does not even provide users with a bitcoin address to send bitcoin to. [Here is a working link that explains it all.](https://web.archive.org/web/20180111142553/https://blog.samouraiwallet.com/post/169222582782/bitpay-qr-codes-are-no-longer-valid-important)\n\n>this is the way the industry is going.\n\nCompanies can use BTCPay Server to accept bitcoin payments, including lightning bitcoin payments, without forcing users to provide any of their personal information. Companies like The Bitcoin Company, Bitrefill, and Coincards sell gift cards for bitcoin without requiring users to provide any of their personal information.\n\n>while also not being shut down like Charlie Shrem\n\nCharlie Shrem was knowingly selling millions of dollars worth of bitcoin to someone named Robert Faiella that was money laundering and operating an unregistered money service business. Charlie Shrem knew that Robert Faiella was selling millions of dollars worth of bitcoin to Silk Road users that needed bitcoin to buy illegal items on the Silk Road marketplace. Charlie Shrem knew what Robert Faiella was doing. Sherm and Faiella discussed it through email. Sherm was not adhering to any AML procedures. Shrem did not file any reports when selling millions of dollars worth of bitcoin to Faiella.",
  "label": "r/bitcoin",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/Bitcoin",
  "datetime": "2024-05-22",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1MZDFId2JBNUJMTUVUOERzS20xN19sZHN5cW80RFB6Sm1EaWxtbzM2TlVuSUlCVTBrWHJKaEQ5eDZ1MjlWUHhzd0VyV3k5eExuLUJPYmlVcDNEajdfclE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9icUliaDlrWFB4M2U4VkVyUDBuaHJjSHJib2xKWVZ3T1RaSnBuZTFjM015TktfaFZSeUdhT3RkZExabGpIOVVjU0EzZGpQempwMWNGcjRtVFM5WUlRSHJFSFVpaEtTVlZ6NUx4bTd3VzZEUXo5LTBCc19HSjhKZWdtNGNBZkxWYlJIWDNNYmxMMDBWdnozaUt3U21UWXdNb3RpNjdlM0l1MTdneXhBVldKVGt0bXdHd0RxOWRBWWZ1TEhPT0htSVB5WXF1QjhjcWdfdnpsQ2tQNk56eFZGZz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information