Row 39409

Row ID: 39409 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 39409 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

I've always thought cyber sec was cool but anyways, I'm only tangential to this stuff but the short version is that you use testing to iterate a computational physics model, not the design itself necessarily. Once your computational model looks good you let it loose on optimization of the design.

I've seen simulation that is shockingly similar to the real life test that follows it. The goal being to reduce the amount of costly real life testing required. Maybe completely.

It's a subtle difference but one is iterating the design and seeing what works. The other is iterating the understanding of the underlying physics so that you already know how a given design will work.

Edit: for basic stuff the physics is also already known via material properties but in a complex and dynamic during crush assembly it gets hairy.

FieldValue
text I've always thought cyber sec was cool but anyways, I'm only tangential to this stuff but the short version is that you use testing to iterate a computational physics model, not the design itself necessarily. Once your computational model looks good you let it loose on optimization of the design. I've seen simulation that is shockingly similar to the real life test that follows it. The goal being to reduce the amount of costly real life testing required. Maybe completely. It's a subtle differ…
label r/tech
dataType comment
communityName r/tech
datetime 2024-05-22
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1MWFdkUnhJQnBfc0VOZ3JtQUFINFVZaWhhMjlkT3JzRVNndXpPM1NnSVptLVBTSWVRRWJZNXgyTTI5aml1NkstRFNjSERLVHFtQ3FZcXUwcjNQaW5DeGc9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9iS0tPbWI1X1MzNV8yOF9LMm5PQS1UZVUxdEtlc243NmREWmRCLUlUZ0RGd05ZWFN6dFhTRkhkSUw3U2YyLWgxOTdDWXBIU25WcXo0S1dWdFNfYXk2OG52c1pyUVcwUWdLY0lyU2VfVzhweWRNemFxalBMcWhSWHp0NnZCcTJTLXRrLVY1X3dqM0hRdmllbDB6UEFGSEViRWtYcXk2OVZ5RnEyWVQtVlJidUtkS0tuVzNnV2Fmb1QtMXBIUE54bVRSMENCWTF4R3dRMENhekV3VXlhZVlDQT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "I've always thought cyber sec was cool but anyways, I'm only tangential to this stuff but the short version is that you use testing to iterate a computational physics model, not the design itself necessarily. Once your computational model looks good you let it loose on optimization of the design. \n\nI've seen simulation that is shockingly similar to the real life test that follows it. The goal being to reduce the amount of costly real life testing required. Maybe completely.\n\nIt's a subtle difference but one is iterating the design and seeing what works. The other is iterating the understanding of the underlying physics so that you already know how a given design will work.\n\nEdit: for basic stuff the physics is also already known via material properties but in a complex and dynamic during crush assembly it gets hairy.",
  "label": "r/tech",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/tech",
  "datetime": "2024-05-22",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1MWFdkUnhJQnBfc0VOZ3JtQUFINFVZaWhhMjlkT3JzRVNndXpPM1NnSVptLVBTSWVRRWJZNXgyTTI5aml1NkstRFNjSERLVHFtQ3FZcXUwcjNQaW5DeGc9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9iS0tPbWI1X1MzNV8yOF9LMm5PQS1UZVUxdEtlc243NmREWmRCLUlUZ0RGd05ZWFN6dFhTRkhkSUw3U2YyLWgxOTdDWXBIU25WcXo0S1dWdFNfYXk2OG52c1pyUVcwUWdLY0lyU2VfVzhweWRNemFxalBMcWhSWHp0NnZCcTJTLXRrLVY1X3dqM0hRdmllbDB6UEFGSEViRWtYcXk2OVZ5RnEyWVQtVlJidUtkS0tuVzNnV2Fmb1QtMXBIUE54bVRSMENCWTF4R3dRMENhekV3VXlhZVlDQT09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information