Row 38601

Row ID: 38601 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 38601 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

> No, that's not correct. Both parties do not have to sign up to the ICC for it to have jurisdiction.

That is what the ICC claims but it violates the founding principles of international law to make that claim.

> Neither Ukraine nor Russia are signatories, yet the ICC issued warrants because it found it had jurisdiction

That Ukraine is not a signatory but it has voluntary accepted ICC jurisdiction.

That said, the arrest warrants on putin are illegal under international law - I have no love for Putin, I spent most of 2022 volunteering as a combat medic in Ukraine attached to a unit of Ukranian marines - I absolutely believe that Putin should be tried for war crimes but the ICC isn't a valid mechanism for doing that - unless Russia consents & surrenders him to the courts jurisdiction.

In order to try Putin for warcrimes under international law without the consent of Russia, you would need to defeat Russia in a war & then create a tribunal under the terms for the peace (*such as the Nuremburg tribunals which tried Nazi officials*).

> especially when the war crimes were committed in Palestinian territory and Palestine is a signatory to the ICC?

Palestine is not a signatory to the ICC - the Palestinian Authority has been accepted as a non-state party to the treaty - Gaza is not under the sovereignty of the Palestinian Authority, & the PA did not exercise sovereignty over Gaza when they joined the ICC in 2015.

Hamas exercises both de jure & de facto sovereignty over the territory in Gaza - applying Palestinian sovereignty to Gaza does not comport with any standard of sovereignty previously used under international law.

> This demonstrates that international law is capable of applying to a state even if they don't recognise the jurisdiction.

This is the ICC's claim - however it flies entirely in the face of every single precedent & principle of international law & fundementally works contrary to the purpose of international law.

International law is not designed nor intended to catch & prosecute criminals (*which is the goal of national laws*) rather international law is designed to prevent (*or limit*) wars & to provide an arena for binding arbitration in order to avoid wars.

FieldValue
text > No, that's not correct. Both parties do not have to sign up to the ICC for it to have jurisdiction. That is what the ICC claims but it violates the founding principles of international law to make that claim. > Neither Ukraine nor Russia are signatories, yet the ICC issued warrants because it found it had jurisdiction That Ukraine is not a signatory but it has voluntary accepted ICC jurisdiction. That said, the arrest warrants on putin are illegal under international law - I have no love …
label r/news
dataType comment
communityName r/news
datetime 2024-05-22
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1Md2VmTWdOUzdhQTNoM3NPZVdKTDAyM3VSUzZ1Q3JsZ05DOExOSENGbVZSWWRuOU8tUzlGMGdKaS1heUVMUTVDMU40R3I4eGhUZUp2WXQwWlhma2RhcFpUNTFLVTZ2TG9UT0RGS3YtRThObjA9
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9hZkN6YWZfNzRHbThiX29LUDdLeVZPQzkySFpFb09wSHo5aFBUSWtoTFY4Q1p5SFN1WHZtVk9Ld3lXb3ZJMGhYMGdLWVpUNkJKX1NuWDRlS0p4Y1hCNGdLazhaa1p2SlNfWF9RZURZWThCRXZTV2dSam1aTl8wWGl3dlFXeEZDTjRGOFk4eG5aVFJSSlpCYmtzMVZKNm91YjJ2bUxUUW94Z1FpY3ZTbkl1dlJ5bVBSR05qLWFMeDJzUmdLaGFRVHozZ0JoNWFkRGJJU1V4TXloczF3ZFVoQT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "> No, that's not correct. Both parties do not have to sign up to the ICC for it to have jurisdiction. \n\nThat is what the ICC claims but it violates the founding principles of international law to make that claim.\n\n> Neither Ukraine nor Russia are signatories, yet the ICC issued warrants because it found it had jurisdiction\n\nThat Ukraine is not a signatory but it has voluntary accepted ICC jurisdiction.\n\nThat said, the arrest warrants on putin are illegal under international law - I have no love for Putin, I spent most of 2022 volunteering as a combat medic in Ukraine attached to a unit of Ukranian marines - I absolutely believe that Putin should be tried for war crimes but the ICC isn't a valid mechanism for doing that - unless Russia consents & surrenders him to the courts jurisdiction.\n\nIn order to try Putin for warcrimes under international law without the consent of Russia, you would need to defeat Russia in a war & then create a tribunal under the terms for the peace (*such as the Nuremburg tribunals which tried Nazi officials*).\n\n> especially when the war crimes were committed in Palestinian territory and Palestine is a signatory to the ICC? \n\nPalestine is not a signatory to the ICC - the Palestinian Authority has been accepted as a non-state party to the treaty - Gaza is not under the sovereignty of the Palestinian Authority, & the PA did not exercise sovereignty over Gaza when they joined the ICC in 2015. \n\nHamas exercises both de jure & de facto sovereignty over the territory in Gaza - applying Palestinian sovereignty to Gaza does not comport with any standard of sovereignty previously used under international law.\n\n> This demonstrates that international law is capable of applying to a state even if they don't recognise the jurisdiction. \n\nThis is the ICC's claim - however it flies entirely in the face of every single precedent & principle of international law & fundementally works contrary to the purpose of international law.\n\nInternational law is not designed nor intended to catch & prosecute criminals (*which is the goal of national laws*) rather international law is designed to prevent (*or limit*) wars & to provide an arena for binding arbitration in order to avoid wars.",
  "label": "r/news",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/news",
  "datetime": "2024-05-22",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1Md2VmTWdOUzdhQTNoM3NPZVdKTDAyM3VSUzZ1Q3JsZ05DOExOSENGbVZSWWRuOU8tUzlGMGdKaS1heUVMUTVDMU40R3I4eGhUZUp2WXQwWlhma2RhcFpUNTFLVTZ2TG9UT0RGS3YtRThObjA9",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9hZkN6YWZfNzRHbThiX29LUDdLeVZPQzkySFpFb09wSHo5aFBUSWtoTFY4Q1p5SFN1WHZtVk9Ld3lXb3ZJMGhYMGdLWVpUNkJKX1NuWDRlS0p4Y1hCNGdLazhaa1p2SlNfWF9RZURZWThCRXZTV2dSam1aTl8wWGl3dlFXeEZDTjRGOFk4eG5aVFJSSlpCYmtzMVZKNm91YjJ2bUxUUW94Z1FpY3ZTbkl1dlJ5bVBSR05qLWFMeDJzUmdLaGFRVHozZ0JoNWFkRGJJU1V4TXloczF3ZFVoQT09"
}

Entry Information