Row 37724

Row ID: 37724 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 37724 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Because they didn't use her voice. They stated that they used a voice actor that they had been working with since before they contacted Scarlett. How similar is too similar is the question. Would it be an issue if someone used recorded audio from a voice actor that may sound like Scarlett? Is intention the only issue? Is it only an issue if they directed the voice actor to sound like Scarlett or chose her because she sounded like Scarlett? Should they not be allowed to do that? Surely they're allowed to find a voice actor with a vaguely similar voice, right? So we're just drawing a line somewhere of how similar sounding is too similar. It's clear they wanted people to see the similarities to the movie her, but any actual copyright or likeness issue in this case is much less clear.

Of course people have other concerns about the company and the future of AI as a whole, but that's not really the discussion here. Training on copyrighted material or how the company is run are very separate concerns from this.

FieldValue
text Because they didn't use her voice. They stated that they used a voice actor that they had been working with since before they contacted Scarlett. How similar is too similar is the question. Would it be an issue if someone used recorded audio from a voice actor that may sound like Scarlett? Is intention the only issue? Is it only an issue if they directed the voice actor to sound like Scarlett or chose her because she sounded like Scarlett? Should they not be allowed to do that? Surely they'…
label r/technology
dataType comment
communityName r/technology
datetime 2024-05-21
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1LUEhFeVc0cUFodmg4bFdpOFVZblVLbFZ3WUlOYU5hb2xlcmZLcnJsNzQ4QVNqOUVIc205UXlnUXdUdFFoTklpcU5pY0tEVHlsVmNpay1nT0p2UjVtbkE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9aT2tIdFBJLTlaeVk0X0hEMmRsUGdGazYyeVhXTUVicHV0RHR2aGJ5TWQzZ1VBeU9Ed0x3bTF2NHdXcENueko5ZEdVQm9vNGF0eWtiS1R2VjZ2UjNUY1ZNOEI2a0dkYWRaVGJrNjFJM3NKcXBMak5YVkxOdkVzcDh0SUJibWpaODRVSjZGaXdhT0ZpRUJ3ODVkd0RuZVJXMHBZODRQWW43allScXZsdEJnODh0UVdTX09Vc2lwTzVKYWtBbWVXSzJhcW1ZWGdGcTNEaHNDenlSTF9DUjR3UT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Because they didn't use her voice. They stated that they used a voice actor that they had been working with since before they contacted Scarlett. How similar is too similar is the question.  \nWould it be an issue if someone used recorded audio from a voice actor that may sound like Scarlett?   \nIs intention the only issue? Is it only an issue if they directed the voice actor to sound like Scarlett or chose her because she sounded like Scarlett? Should they not be allowed to do that? Surely they're allowed to find a voice actor with a vaguely similar voice, right? So we're just drawing a line somewhere of how similar sounding is too similar.  \nIt's clear they wanted people to see the similarities to the movie her, but any actual copyright or likeness issue in this case is much less clear.\n\nOf course people have other concerns about the company and the future of AI as a whole, but that's not really the discussion here. Training on copyrighted material or how the company is run are very separate concerns from this.",
  "label": "r/technology",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/technology",
  "datetime": "2024-05-21",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1LUEhFeVc0cUFodmg4bFdpOFVZblVLbFZ3WUlOYU5hb2xlcmZLcnJsNzQ4QVNqOUVIc205UXlnUXdUdFFoTklpcU5pY0tEVHlsVmNpay1nT0p2UjVtbkE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9aT2tIdFBJLTlaeVk0X0hEMmRsUGdGazYyeVhXTUVicHV0RHR2aGJ5TWQzZ1VBeU9Ed0x3bTF2NHdXcENueko5ZEdVQm9vNGF0eWtiS1R2VjZ2UjNUY1ZNOEI2a0dkYWRaVGJrNjFJM3NKcXBMak5YVkxOdkVzcDh0SUJibWpaODRVSjZGaXdhT0ZpRUJ3ODVkd0RuZVJXMHBZODRQWW43allScXZsdEJnODh0UVdTX09Vc2lwTzVKYWtBbWVXSzJhcW1ZWGdGcTNEaHNDenlSTF9DUjR3UT09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information