Row 36640

Row ID: 36640 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 36640 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

There is a huge difference between "majority opinion" and a scientifically supported fact in which there is no verified/reproducible contradicting evidence. In this example, chat gpt's source of truth is not majority opinion, but rather scientific consensus. That means the research has converged with many different reproduction verifying the results.

AI should tell the facts. I am not a fan of protecting the feelings of ignorant people. It only emboldens th to spread their misinformation/disinformation.

I could settle for, "Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but your position is not supported by any verified research. If you have questions or would like to review the data, I am happy to help"

FieldValue
text There is a huge difference between "majority opinion" and a scientifically supported fact in which there is no verified/reproducible contradicting evidence. In this example, chat gpt's source of truth is not majority opinion, but rather scientific consensus. That means the research has converged with many different reproduction verifying the results. AI should tell the facts. I am not a fan of protecting the feelings of ignorant people. It only emboldens th to spread their misinformation/disinf…
label r/chatgpt
dataType comment
communityName r/ChatGPT
datetime 2024-05-21
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1KWXV5MGpFajFFRFlPLWNhbVp6bzgzamt1ak9ITll1aGQtOElYVm1pS1VHZE5fVFdhdzZzMmJHZS1LRkpmWGVUTkpmTEhqOVc0UE5KeU94WVc2TnlLNFE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9aY3pzcGxRYU1CQ3pYNXJHYlNFZHBzMkk0UGtVa0tUT29JaHdVbHNuRXpyakZIaUR6RUtBRC1qaS1ZdVhuN2FFSjhPZFRTa1NrZ1JYU0xqaUtZMTZUMEc5bFVERXZwZ2FDNkg1RWtYS3IydTVEaGxVdzZCUVQ4UFl1YUhteVFfak5yU1Q0aFl3MzZJUGV3SWNzcjZLWDAtLVJWdjJPQ1NUVEg0Y1ZvX0ZVdzFuNVRhaXc0bENSQzkxY3poZXBweFRpNXZYdDJLeE1GV1p5d2tUUk5UR3c3dz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "There is a huge difference between \"majority opinion\" and a scientifically supported fact in which there is no verified/reproducible contradicting evidence. In this example, chat gpt's source of truth is not majority opinion, but rather scientific consensus. That means the research has converged with many different reproduction verifying the results.\n\nAI should tell the facts. I am not a fan of protecting the feelings of ignorant people. It only emboldens th to spread their misinformation/disinformation.\n\nI could settle for, \"Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but your position is not supported by any verified research. If you have questions or would like to review the data, I am happy to help\"",
  "label": "r/chatgpt",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/ChatGPT",
  "datetime": "2024-05-21",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1KWXV5MGpFajFFRFlPLWNhbVp6bzgzamt1ak9ITll1aGQtOElYVm1pS1VHZE5fVFdhdzZzMmJHZS1LRkpmWGVUTkpmTEhqOVc0UE5KeU94WVc2TnlLNFE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9aY3pzcGxRYU1CQ3pYNXJHYlNFZHBzMkk0UGtVa0tUT29JaHdVbHNuRXpyakZIaUR6RUtBRC1qaS1ZdVhuN2FFSjhPZFRTa1NrZ1JYU0xqaUtZMTZUMEc5bFVERXZwZ2FDNkg1RWtYS3IydTVEaGxVdzZCUVQ4UFl1YUhteVFfak5yU1Q0aFl3MzZJUGV3SWNzcjZLWDAtLVJWdjJPQ1NUVEg0Y1ZvX0ZVdzFuNVRhaXc0bENSQzkxY3poZXBweFRpNXZYdDJLeE1GV1p5d2tUUk5UR3c3dz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information