Row 3472

Row ID: 3472 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 3472 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

>I'm not confident about the actual meaning behind much of this.

It actually does have a lot of significance in U.S. foreign relations. "Ally" isn't about who's reliable or who the U.S. has influence over. Per DOD's website: "Alliances are formal agreements between two or more nations. In national defense, they're promises that each nation will support the other, particularly during war...Treaties are the documents that seal the deal on alliances, so sometimes you might hear the term 'treaty ally.'"

[https://www.defense.gov/News/Feature-Stories/story/Article/1684641/alliances-vs-partnerships/](https://www.defense.gov/News/Feature-Stories/story/Article/1684641/alliances-vs-partnerships/)

As for the term "Major Non-NATO ally", from the State Department: "Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA) status is a designation under U.S. law that provides foreign partners with certain benefits in the areas of defense trade and security cooperation."

[https://www.state.gov/major-non-nato-ally-status/](https://www.state.gov/major-non-nato-ally-status/)

"Ally" doesn't necessarily suggest 100% reliability or 100% alignment on every single issue - easy example is the sheer number of countries (including many traditional U.S. allies like Japan, France, etc.) who have voted in the UN for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, while the U.S. votes against it.

You could argue there should be a separate category for countries that the U.S. can rely on much more, the U.S. can influence more easily, etc. But there's no official term or designation for that right now - in either U.S. legislation or U.S. foreign policy. Allies and alliances, on the other hand, are defined.

FieldValue
text >I'm not confident about the actual meaning behind much of this. It actually does have a lot of significance in U.S. foreign relations. "Ally" isn't about who's reliable or who the U.S. has influence over. Per DOD's website: "Alliances are formal agreements between two or more nations. In national defense, they're promises that each nation will support the other, particularly during war...Treaties are the documents that seal the deal on alliances, so sometimes you might hear the term 'treaty al…
label r/foreignpolicyanalysis
dataType comment
communityName r/foreignpolicyanalysis
datetime 2024-03-09
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwxTzNHV1lVM21YbF82U1p0NGQ3NHZ2YVdPbU1oZi1falZ0WHFiUl9JYUczczAxOXJoZGRHQUJzaWdMWThwdXp6QlRQTG1BcXhBaEpCN0V4Q2MtaTJRSFhSeDJnUzlwTnhNWUozdEdadXdxTFk9
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9Fc0lVbmpRUk0zMDlUNEJfLUY2a0hLWk9SM2t6WU5pOTM3UklXR3V2Q2VVSDNRczdoWU9Mb2l6UG93R1ZiVjlrbUp4TzRDdUtvRDlPNURZMjFNb2I5cU5mZDdsdmNzRWpIeHBIVmkzWkJvUHhfdksyaWl6UXRiRG1aSWs2QTgwZGZUdjZDMF9LWWR1b2J4U3IzbmxsNXhYRXFYeThENVB5UHNsVUwwTnVBTFVHUzF6TUw1OGNEakIxN1doc1FZc2F0NHFtZExLeUQxNGtwWE92Vl95aFFEbjk1V2NpVEw5clRweU5kRE5EQ0JLOD0=

Raw Record

{
  "text": ">I'm not confident about the actual meaning behind much of this.\n\nIt actually does have a lot of significance in U.S. foreign relations. \"Ally\" isn't about who's reliable or who the U.S. has influence over. Per DOD's website: \"Alliances are formal agreements between two or more nations. In national defense, they're promises that each nation will support the other, particularly during war...Treaties are the documents that seal the deal on alliances, so sometimes you might hear the term 'treaty ally.'\"\n\n[https://www.defense.gov/News/Feature-Stories/story/Article/1684641/alliances-vs-partnerships/](https://www.defense.gov/News/Feature-Stories/story/Article/1684641/alliances-vs-partnerships/) \n\nAs for the term \"Major Non-NATO ally\", from the State Department: \"Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA) status is a designation under U.S. law that provides foreign partners with certain benefits in the areas of defense trade and security cooperation.\"\n\n[https://www.state.gov/major-non-nato-ally-status/](https://www.state.gov/major-non-nato-ally-status/) \n\n\"Ally\" doesn't necessarily suggest 100% reliability or 100% alignment on every single issue - easy example is the sheer number of countries (including many traditional U.S. allies like Japan, France, etc.) who have voted in the UN for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, while the U.S. votes against it.\n\nYou could argue there should be a separate category for countries that the U.S. can rely on much more, the U.S. can influence more easily, etc. But there's no official term or designation for that right now - in either U.S. legislation or U.S. foreign policy. Allies and alliances, on the other hand, are defined.",
  "label": "r/foreignpolicyanalysis",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/foreignpolicyanalysis",
  "datetime": "2024-03-09",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwxTzNHV1lVM21YbF82U1p0NGQ3NHZ2YVdPbU1oZi1falZ0WHFiUl9JYUczczAxOXJoZGRHQUJzaWdMWThwdXp6QlRQTG1BcXhBaEpCN0V4Q2MtaTJRSFhSeDJnUzlwTnhNWUozdEdadXdxTFk9",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9Fc0lVbmpRUk0zMDlUNEJfLUY2a0hLWk9SM2t6WU5pOTM3UklXR3V2Q2VVSDNRczdoWU9Mb2l6UG93R1ZiVjlrbUp4TzRDdUtvRDlPNURZMjFNb2I5cU5mZDdsdmNzRWpIeHBIVmkzWkJvUHhfdksyaWl6UXRiRG1aSWs2QTgwZGZUdjZDMF9LWWR1b2J4U3IzbmxsNXhYRXFYeThENVB5UHNsVUwwTnVBTFVHUzF6TUw1OGNEakIxN1doc1FZc2F0NHFtZExLeUQxNGtwWE92Vl95aFFEbjk1V2NpVEw5clRweU5kRE5EQ0JLOD0="
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information