Row 33623

Row ID: 33623 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 33623 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

They were tweeting things like "Her" and there is, according to ScarJo, a clear paper trail of them asking permission, being denied, even asking again- and going through with it without permission.

I think if they just made a voice that we're pretty sure was based off of hers, but there's no proof- it does became an interesting debate about if someone 'owns' their voice. But OpenAI made it pretty clear they were trying to leverage her performance and the creative cache of the film Her while believing they needed permission and then not receiving it.

It does bring us to interesting precedent coming up, whether in this case or another. What counts as a voice? How do we define it? Are impressions not allowed? What if I just actually sound a lot like a famous person, can I have my voice rights struck down if I post a video of me speaking? If they called it a parody, would that cover it?

If someone used an AI voice of Biden in a funny video- that's cool, right? But if they use his voice in a political campaign where he says "I want to Nuke England and ban gay marriage"-should that be allowed? Can I make it seem like Tom Cruise is narrating my film without his permission?

I won't pretend to know how the law currently defines all these things, but I both entirely agree with ScarJo on this one, while also hoping it doesn't set unreasonable precedents that overstep from basic protection to restrictions on people with voices that are too similar to a famous person or IP.

FieldValue
text They were tweeting things like "Her" and there is, according to ScarJo, a clear paper trail of them asking permission, being denied, even asking again- and going through with it without permission. I think if they just made a voice that we're pretty sure was based off of hers, but there's no proof- it does became an interesting debate about if someone 'owns' their voice. But OpenAI made it pretty clear they were trying to leverage her performance and the creative cache of the film Her while be…
label r/openai
dataType comment
communityName r/OpenAI
datetime 2024-05-21
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1IUWI2TklYaFNPU25CdXZFcWw5TFZtbVItSmNtRjk1WU45bXFvenlOcHRvdHROaTh3TnBPTHdrUkVEaG92Z1Z6anhZdWFHLXZfaUJQa1NDZk5UdURVaG90QmJWampCV19TbTROLUpOT044bDA9
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9YYnFwTldRcldrZU1nVldDRWZGQjJoM0FvamhsRjNWdTQ3LUF2dUM2WmowUVI4ajlJWjNiWk8wQmRJSnZGTVJvMTVmUnNId201SUxlXzAyZDhreE5HM0x2QVplNWxZeWV5NktCRGhMUFQwMGVXcTdheWNoa0tDTFdEY19DQlowNlluT0t4QmhqWmlqenRIUXdmcWdqcGt2RWRtODd5WDl2MUFWaGhwLXN0cWVCR0tKMWNEUkJMTnZUN0V3NWZvR0EzZVlnX09qX0pnVTBSUURrSTVsTHJEZz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "They were tweeting things like \"Her\" and there is, according to ScarJo, a clear paper trail of them asking permission, being denied, even asking again- and going through with it without permission. \n\nI think if they just made a voice that we're pretty sure was based off of hers, but there's no proof- it does became an interesting debate about if someone 'owns' their voice. But OpenAI made it pretty clear they were trying to leverage her performance and the creative cache of the film Her while believing they needed permission and then not receiving it. \n\nIt does bring us to interesting precedent coming up, whether in this case or another. What counts as a voice? How do we define it?  Are impressions not allowed? What if I just actually sound a lot like a famous person, can I have my voice rights struck down if I post a video of me speaking? If they called it a parody, would that cover it? \n\nIf someone used an AI voice of Biden in a funny video- that's cool, right? But if they use his voice in a political campaign where he says \"I want to Nuke England and ban gay marriage\"-should that be allowed? Can I make it seem like Tom Cruise is narrating my film without his permission? \n\nI won't pretend to know how the law currently defines all these things, but I both entirely agree with ScarJo on this one, while also hoping it doesn't set unreasonable precedents that overstep from basic protection to restrictions on people with voices that are too similar to a famous person or IP.",
  "label": "r/openai",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/OpenAI",
  "datetime": "2024-05-21",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1IUWI2TklYaFNPU25CdXZFcWw5TFZtbVItSmNtRjk1WU45bXFvenlOcHRvdHROaTh3TnBPTHdrUkVEaG92Z1Z6anhZdWFHLXZfaUJQa1NDZk5UdURVaG90QmJWampCV19TbTROLUpOT044bDA9",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9YYnFwTldRcldrZU1nVldDRWZGQjJoM0FvamhsRjNWdTQ3LUF2dUM2WmowUVI4ajlJWjNiWk8wQmRJSnZGTVJvMTVmUnNId201SUxlXzAyZDhreE5HM0x2QVplNWxZeWV5NktCRGhMUFQwMGVXcTdheWNoa0tDTFdEY19DQlowNlluT0t4QmhqWmlqenRIUXdmcWdqcGt2RWRtODd5WDl2MUFWaGhwLXN0cWVCR0tKMWNEUkJMTnZUN0V3NWZvR0EzZVlnX09qX0pnVTBSUURrSTVsTHJEZz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information