Row 33195

Row ID: 33195 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 33195 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Thank you for looking at the sources, I'd encourage you to look at the first one more in depth, it doesn't claim that false memories aren't a thing, but references multiple scholars and studies who have found that the claims of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation are without scientific merit.

And that the foundation has ethical issues that they never address (such as assuming that every parent who wrote to the foundation was innocent, because the foundation board considered themselves "good looking people"), or the fact that they haven't been able to prove a memory is false, that the foundation board members advocated for lowering the age of consent, that they never address the prevalence of child abuse, or that their primary scholar for their claims primarily defends powerful pedophiles like Weinstein and Epstein.

Essentially the claims of the false memory syndrome foundation are based on weak evidence and in practice have been used to protect rich pedophiles, have muddied the waters of actual false memory research, and have remained in the public consciousness despite being throughly discredited.

For the second piece similarly the claim is not that all instances of satanic ritual abuse or non-sra abuse in the 80s were accurate, but that journalists started with a conclusion "this is a witch-hunt", and then sought the defense lawyers of the accused as primary sources to retroactively justify this conclusion. And that this narrative spread because the accusations threatened our very concept of family, which was a central driving value of political and social life in the Reagan era.

What the narrative ended up doing is homogenizing all cases as fradulent, pinning the blame on "radical-feminist therapists" (another enemy of the Reagan era) for destroying family values, limited the agency of children, and muddied the waters of actual sexual abuse cases.

FieldValue
text Thank you for looking at the sources, I'd encourage you to look at the first one more in depth, it doesn't claim that false memories aren't a thing, but references multiple scholars and studies who have found that the claims of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation are without scientific merit. And that the foundation has ethical issues that they never address (such as assuming that every parent who wrote to the foundation was innocent, because the foundation board considered themselves "good l…
label r/openai
dataType comment
communityName r/OpenAI
datetime 2024-05-21
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1IVnR2UE8td3JsMmpidWJCQlNvRVM0Snd1VFlZVE5iYmszQy1OMjk3RXRBNXhBcGkwcXo0VU9hVDJtR29kWXBnZ3VWTnE2aExGTjZ0UHFMbVBlMWh1T2c9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9YWG5PZmVCa2duVjFNNlZjTG4zUDRFLUN6c3VEOWgwV1NLUEo1aEFPLVY1LV95WkhJTklGUGJHRnVKMW9WOVJ3UFpweFpYRmlCUkh1eW5XTVNjTDJrd1Z6Rldzb2N6aGJYQXhxX3ljQWRKMWUyYjlnRlpkZ2tTLTdLaGUxMFN4aE1sTEszOFJVMVJSOGNuQ1ZzT0RVMUJOekwtS0ctcUhfUFJiSmV0bmRySU1XZ19LMmtTR2xjREN0S2QxYmx5U0VSN29VTFhoX1F2dWZDU1JTTmhDZ09rdz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Thank you for looking at the sources, I'd encourage you to look at the first one more in depth, it doesn't claim that false memories aren't a thing, but references multiple scholars and studies who have found that the claims of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation are without scientific merit. \n\nAnd that the foundation has ethical issues that they never address (such as assuming that every parent who wrote to the foundation was innocent, because the foundation board considered themselves \"good looking people\"), or the fact that they haven't been able to prove a memory is false, that the foundation board members advocated for lowering the age of consent, that they never address the prevalence of child abuse, or that their primary scholar for their claims primarily defends powerful pedophiles like Weinstein and Epstein. \n\nEssentially the claims of the false memory syndrome foundation are based on weak evidence and in practice have been used to protect rich pedophiles, have muddied the waters of actual false memory research, and have remained in the public consciousness despite being throughly discredited.\n\nFor the second piece similarly the claim is not that all instances of satanic ritual abuse or non-sra abuse in the 80s were accurate, but that journalists started with a conclusion \"this is a witch-hunt\", and then sought the defense lawyers of the accused as primary sources to retroactively justify this conclusion. And that this narrative spread because the accusations threatened our very concept of family, which was a central driving value of political and social life in the Reagan era. \n\nWhat the narrative ended up doing is homogenizing all cases as fradulent, pinning the blame on \"radical-feminist therapists\" (another enemy of the Reagan era) for destroying family values, limited the agency of children, and muddied the waters of actual sexual abuse cases.",
  "label": "r/openai",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/OpenAI",
  "datetime": "2024-05-21",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1IVnR2UE8td3JsMmpidWJCQlNvRVM0Snd1VFlZVE5iYmszQy1OMjk3RXRBNXhBcGkwcXo0VU9hVDJtR29kWXBnZ3VWTnE2aExGTjZ0UHFMbVBlMWh1T2c9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9YWG5PZmVCa2duVjFNNlZjTG4zUDRFLUN6c3VEOWgwV1NLUEo1aEFPLVY1LV95WkhJTklGUGJHRnVKMW9WOVJ3UFpweFpYRmlCUkh1eW5XTVNjTDJrd1Z6Rldzb2N6aGJYQXhxX3ljQWRKMWUyYjlnRlpkZ2tTLTdLaGUxMFN4aE1sTEszOFJVMVJSOGNuQ1ZzT0RVMUJOekwtS0ctcUhfUFJiSmV0bmRySU1XZ19LMmtTR2xjREN0S2QxYmx5U0VSN29VTFhoX1F2dWZDU1JTTmhDZ09rdz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information