Row 31702

Row ID: 31702 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 31702 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

I skimmed the first, you will have to give cliff notes on the second.

Excluding the personal drama and anecdotes, this seems to be trying to make the case that false memories are not a real thing in this context.

Discounting a large body of studies that show false memories can be incepted on the basis that they don't try to incept memories of childhood sexual abuse with test subjects is absurd. That would be beyond unethical.

Holding up a single study of failing to incept an implausible event as proof it doesn't work for sexual abuse is both classic confirmation bias and subject to the same criticism made of the other studies - it's a proxy for sexual abuse, not sexual abuse. And sexual abuse is clearly only too plausible.

Can you explain the disparity between the vast number of alleged cases in the satanic panic and the outcome of investigations?

> A 1994 article in the New York Times claims that: "Of the more than 12,000 documented accusations nationwide, investigating police were not able to substantiate any allegations of organized cult abuse".

That beggars belief if even a small fraction of the allegations were valid - people just aren't that effective at concealing evidence. It would be the most tightly organized and effective conspiracy in history with information security and ability to remove evidence to humble national intelligence agencies.

FieldValue
text I skimmed the first, you will have to give cliff notes on the second. Excluding the personal drama and anecdotes, this seems to be trying to make the case that false memories are not a real thing in this context. Discounting a large body of studies that show false memories can be incepted on the basis that they don't try to incept memories of childhood sexual abuse with test subjects is absurd. That would be beyond unethical. Holding up a single study of failing to incept an implausible event…
label r/openai
dataType comment
communityName r/OpenAI
datetime 2024-05-21
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1HeVlsN0J1d2dUcEd1TzFpM3BSMS1wcXhnM1hzUWsyS3dueE1SamJTWUVVbmJjTUpvZjRnSEtocjBQaWVES2pyXzVMT0JnZDBmRzFLUlVlbENxRDY3WEE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9XV3BEc2wzX1hDUnhBQkFlRzBpZjZFNlJSTk44UHZjaHhULXZzRHp1LWRfZGdDWEU0Smo3OFFZQ3BlczdiXzMwQ253VVJIZktRZlJxNDR6VVJ5Znk3QWxxX0NiZldRSTM4TXJaMFIzTjNjUHQ4b3NjZ25kVGQzbzNBd0pYZ3RkZG8zeUJVM1NraTRIVy10ZFM1SllnQU9sZTdDMWs4N1c3WGw3QUZXSUFRQWxlNTNCQ3FyV1JaRURDdl9XMzVrWElJems4TmhNdXV6dmcybUQ2Y0VtRm9EQT09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "I skimmed the first, you will have to give cliff notes on the second.\n\nExcluding the personal drama and anecdotes, this seems to be trying to make the case that false memories are not a real thing in this context.\n\nDiscounting a large body of studies that show false memories can be incepted on the basis that they don't try to incept memories of childhood sexual abuse with test subjects is absurd. That would be beyond unethical.\n\nHolding up a single study of failing to incept an implausible event as proof it doesn't work for sexual abuse is both classic confirmation bias and subject to the same criticism made of the other studies - it's a proxy for sexual abuse, not sexual abuse. And sexual abuse is clearly only too plausible.\n\nCan you explain the disparity between the vast number of alleged cases in the satanic panic and the outcome of investigations?\n\n> A 1994 article in the New York Times claims that: \"Of the more than 12,000 documented accusations nationwide, investigating police were not able to substantiate any allegations of organized cult abuse\".\n\nThat beggars belief if even a small fraction of the allegations were valid - people just aren't that effective at concealing evidence. It would be the most tightly organized and effective conspiracy in history with information security and ability to remove evidence to humble national intelligence agencies.",
  "label": "r/openai",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/OpenAI",
  "datetime": "2024-05-21",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1HeVlsN0J1d2dUcEd1TzFpM3BSMS1wcXhnM1hzUWsyS3dueE1SamJTWUVVbmJjTUpvZjRnSEtocjBQaWVES2pyXzVMT0JnZDBmRzFLUlVlbENxRDY3WEE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9XV3BEc2wzX1hDUnhBQkFlRzBpZjZFNlJSTk44UHZjaHhULXZzRHp1LWRfZGdDWEU0Smo3OFFZQ3BlczdiXzMwQ253VVJIZktRZlJxNDR6VVJ5Znk3QWxxX0NiZldRSTM4TXJaMFIzTjNjUHQ4b3NjZ25kVGQzbzNBd0pYZ3RkZG8zeUJVM1NraTRIVy10ZFM1SllnQU9sZTdDMWs4N1c3WGw3QUZXSUFRQWxlNTNCQ3FyV1JaRURDdl9XMzVrWElJems4TmhNdXV6dmcybUQ2Y0VtRm9EQT09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information