Row 31040

Row ID: 31040 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 31040 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Neither case was determined based on copyright though, so it wasn't the written content that was critical. The key is the implied likeness. One of the cases involved the parody of a song, so it wasn't a copyright violation. I'm not sure why the other case wasn't an issue of copyright, possibly they had the rights to cover the song and assumed they could also mimic the voice before the lawsuit.

Whether Sam's tweet is enough remains to be seen, but the attempted hiring of Scarlet also piles on to the implied mimicry.

FieldValue
text Neither case was determined based on copyright though, so it wasn't the written content that was critical. The key is the implied likeness. One of the cases involved the parody of a song, so it wasn't a copyright violation. I'm not sure why the other case wasn't an issue of copyright, possibly they had the rights to cover the song and assumed they could also mimic the voice before the lawsuit. Whether Sam's tweet is enough remains to be seen, but the attempted hiring of Scarlet also piles on t…
label r/artificial
dataType comment
communityName r/artificial
datetime 2024-05-21
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1HOHoxcExFM2Z1N3p1X1JLaTd6dV9CNFBWcmUtbjVJR2UyT0tnbzRSY0RNdk8yTWFmM0RyVFh6dkRnbTFKTGNNM0pINWRuQThQeFp2WENuMUtJanV0S2JQZmo0c1JDSHdJT0tMUm5vZTBIYTQ9
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9WaGd4bjVGbEpCMGwzcF9SRHotMXRXTlB2Mkw2VzZCeTQ4R3NpT1NBSFphY2hYUlRYTmVHcUZBNkt2U1JoclFrMk5fbG9YSW9GX0xLZEQtclE2ZWNYWFJvQjZwYzNxM2Uzb0FId01jcVEwNFdsZWFSNU11QzBCZnR4elo1TW5rN0lJeWJZOUdIeURiZ19nYk1OZXg1SXhBUnVvakNvQlh4VW1yLXFJY3B1cHZqQkJvaVBwbnB6RDdSVWkycVhhektGbDlfcFhYNExCcDBTeHAtenhPU0VSdz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Neither case was determined based on copyright though, so it wasn't the written content that was critical. The key is the implied likeness. One of the cases involved the parody of a song, so it wasn't a copyright violation. I'm not sure why the other case wasn't an issue of copyright, possibly they had the rights to cover the song and assumed they could also mimic the voice before the lawsuit. \n\nWhether Sam's tweet is enough remains to be seen, but the attempted hiring of Scarlet also piles on to the implied mimicry.",
  "label": "r/artificial",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/artificial",
  "datetime": "2024-05-21",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1HOHoxcExFM2Z1N3p1X1JLaTd6dV9CNFBWcmUtbjVJR2UyT0tnbzRSY0RNdk8yTWFmM0RyVFh6dkRnbTFKTGNNM0pINWRuQThQeFp2WENuMUtJanV0S2JQZmo0c1JDSHdJT0tMUm5vZTBIYTQ9",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9WaGd4bjVGbEpCMGwzcF9SRHotMXRXTlB2Mkw2VzZCeTQ4R3NpT1NBSFphY2hYUlRYTmVHcUZBNkt2U1JoclFrMk5fbG9YSW9GX0xLZEQtclE2ZWNYWFJvQjZwYzNxM2Uzb0FId01jcVEwNFdsZWFSNU11QzBCZnR4elo1TW5rN0lJeWJZOUdIeURiZ19nYk1OZXg1SXhBUnVvakNvQlh4VW1yLXFJY3B1cHZqQkJvaVBwbnB6RDdSVWkycVhhektGbDlfcFhYNExCcDBTeHAtenhPU0VSdz09"
}

Entry Information