Row 30306
Content Data
This page contains data entry 30306 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.
> If you genuinely believe we need AI to do any of that shit instead of, you know, humans just not being giant pieces of shit all the time, I feel sorry for you
If you _honestly_ think humans are capable of giving a shit about _anything_ outside of their private bubbles - then get your fucking head out of the sand lol.
> If anything, AI will just further increase inequality
Yeah. The more we slow it down, the longer companies will have with current-level tech.
Not sure how you think having abundance on the scale of millions of times more than what we currently have today will lead to more inequality though. How is a single human - likely a rich fuck who's too stupid to know how to connect their phones to their home wi-fi - going to take exclusive control of already aligned ASI?
Obviously we knew a bad-actor scenario is possible. That's what we're trying to avoid. The slower we go, the more chances they have to set a precedence of _slowly_ replacing humans with AI in companies without said companies being taxed for it.
> make wars even deadlier
Highly doubt this. We'll have AGI before they get around to actually using it effectively instead of just as PR and showing off.
> and be catastrophic for the poor and middle class who will all lose their jobs to the chat bots that work for free.
Not sure how you think this is physically possible.
Either the AI is competent enough to replace all humans and it's AGI, in which case it doesn't matter, or it's not, and it can't.
Sure we have some systems that are leading towards that and that are doing things like replacing call centers and graphic designers, but at least in the case of call-centers they quickly find that the technology is HIGHLY lacking and not as intelligent yet as they would have hoped.
Currently software progress is vastly outpacing hardware and robot progress. This will continue _unless we slow it down_, which would be _very bad_.
***
I know it's hard to comprehend what AGI means and why it's not like those sci-fi fantasy pop-culture expressions of art like terminator or detroit become human or the matrix, but when you actually take a realistic perspective on what _next evolution_ means, it may start to sink in.
Keep in mind that there's nothing special about humans. We're not magic. Bacteria managed to accident into becoming multi-cellular organisms that can traverse in outer space, there's nothing stopping us from using ASI to take the next step.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| text | > If you genuinely believe we need AI to do any of that shit instead of, you know, humans just not being giant pieces of shit all the time, I feel sorry for you If you _honestly_ think humans are capable of giving a shit about _anything_ outside of their private bubbles - then get your fucking head out of the sand lol. > If anything, AI will just further increase inequality Yeah. The more we slow it down, the longer companies will have with current-level tech. Not sure how you think having a… |
| label | r/technology |
| dataType | comment |
| communityName | r/technology |
| datetime | 2024-05-21 |
| username_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1GZzBSQ0JBT1lJZkZwSmlaWWJrLUxFRGRyNENkSTRBRVVwLWRFa0dITm1ST1N5MnE1TFFhTXlhWHhGcW1JVm9wVWVTVUp1WHlVWjE3Zkxxb1E3bHRYSlpJRHFhS3BIR21ZT1V0ZFdRUlNJQkE9 |
| url_encoded | Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9WUXY1dS1LczlPdGtpOVFaNDVHVUdyanlpQUhlX1VKd2lmQmdCdVpkcDhNeGpkLTgteVQtdWFZQm9wZHV6YTBmU3FzdUZObGowd1FiSFk5aXdUVzhtYzJscTRtdWptRU5pTGd3REFmMlc4ck15QWE1UFY4am16eklTMjRxOWFiUllWN1l6WWxUN3Y3VlRHWDBoZlVJcTlOV2czTHA3VHp0YXI5bDRKZWRvUXJPb214dl83VG5oZElNMmdhd3pyTFNfdUR4ODhZRXhJeERtUEYyMWtqYU85Zz09 |
Raw Record
{
"text": "> If you genuinely believe we need AI to do any of that shit instead of, you know, humans just not being giant pieces of shit all the time, I feel sorry for you\n\nIf you _honestly_ think humans are capable of giving a shit about _anything_ outside of their private bubbles - then get your fucking head out of the sand lol.\n\n> If anything, AI will just further increase inequality\n\nYeah. The more we slow it down, the longer companies will have with current-level tech.\n\nNot sure how you think having abundance on the scale of millions of times more than what we currently have today will lead to more inequality though. How is a single human - likely a rich fuck who's too stupid to know how to connect their phones to their home wi-fi - going to take exclusive control of already aligned ASI?\n\nObviously we knew a bad-actor scenario is possible. That's what we're trying to avoid. The slower we go, the more chances they have to set a precedence of _slowly_ replacing humans with AI in companies without said companies being taxed for it.\n\n> make wars even deadlier\n\nHighly doubt this. We'll have AGI before they get around to actually using it effectively instead of just as PR and showing off.\n\n> and be catastrophic for the poor and middle class who will all lose their jobs to the chat bots that work for free.\n\nNot sure how you think this is physically possible.\n\nEither the AI is competent enough to replace all humans and it's AGI, in which case it doesn't matter, or it's not, and it can't.\n\nSure we have some systems that are leading towards that and that are doing things like replacing call centers and graphic designers, but at least in the case of call-centers they quickly find that the technology is HIGHLY lacking and not as intelligent yet as they would have hoped.\n\nCurrently software progress is vastly outpacing hardware and robot progress. This will continue _unless we slow it down_, which would be _very bad_.\n\n***\n\nI know it's hard to comprehend what AGI means and why it's not like those sci-fi fantasy pop-culture expressions of art like terminator or detroit become human or the matrix, but when you actually take a realistic perspective on what _next evolution_ means, it may start to sink in.\n\nKeep in mind that there's nothing special about humans. We're not magic. Bacteria managed to accident into becoming multi-cellular organisms that can traverse in outer space, there's nothing stopping us from using ASI to take the next step.",
"label": "r/technology",
"dataType": "comment",
"communityName": "r/technology",
"datetime": "2024-05-21",
"username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak1GZzBSQ0JBT1lJZkZwSmlaWWJrLUxFRGRyNENkSTRBRVVwLWRFa0dITm1ST1N5MnE1TFFhTXlhWHhGcW1JVm9wVWVTVUp1WHlVWjE3Zkxxb1E3bHRYSlpJRHFhS3BIR21ZT1V0ZFdRUlNJQkE9",
"url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9WUXY1dS1LczlPdGtpOVFaNDVHVUdyanlpQUhlX1VKd2lmQmdCdVpkcDhNeGpkLTgteVQtdWFZQm9wZHV6YTBmU3FzdUZObGowd1FiSFk5aXdUVzhtYzJscTRtdWptRU5pTGd3REFmMlc4ck15QWE1UFY4am16eklTMjRxOWFiUllWN1l6WWxUN3Y3VlRHWDBoZlVJcTlOV2czTHA3VHp0YXI5bDRKZWRvUXJPb214dl83VG5oZElNMmdhd3pyTFNfdUR4ODhZRXhJeERtUEYyMWtqYU85Zz09"
}
Entry Information
- Entry ID: 30306
- Repository: Axioma AXP
- Dataset: arrmlet/reddit_dataset_36
- Total Entries: 100,000