Row 2877

Row ID: 2877 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 2877 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Okay, so, lots to unpack here.

Firstly, separate logical thinking and problem solving. These are different mental skills. Problem solving usually involves discipline to stick to a problem definition approach, the intelligence to find the insights that render the problem solvable, the wisdom to separate the important insights from the noise, and the creativity & divergent thinking to evaluate multiple solutions.

Logical thinking, per the traditions of formal logic, are more about proper processing of evidence and assumptions while remaining cognizant of (and attempting to avoid) the logical fallacies that constantly lay in wait to trip humans up.

I am a deeply logical human and formally trained in analytical philosophy and this is not something that most people want and appreciate, practically, in the real world. The most logical person you know is either a terrible pedant or a misanthrope.

So, let’s stick with problem solving.

What you would want to do is identify how many meaningful questions a person could ask in response to a problem, how they might go about attempting to develop learning against those questions, and the quantity of possible solutions pathways they would consider.

You could pick a handful of thorny problems and write approaches to each.

And in ancient times, the first step in being a genius was to be independently wealthy. Otherwise, you were never educated — possibly illiterate — and toiled. When you were wealthy, you now had to decide whether to focus on the affairs of the day or on the theoretical learning. It is the theoretical learning that survives with a name attached. But know that some human devised and designed the Roman aqueducts. We don’t know who, but they were every bit the genius of the theoretical scholars.

On this sub, I imagine, you’ll find more aqueduct builders than Nobel prize winners.

FieldValue
text Okay, so, lots to unpack here. Firstly, separate logical thinking and problem solving. These are different mental skills. Problem solving usually involves discipline to stick to a problem definition approach, the intelligence to find the insights that render the problem solvable, the wisdom to separate the important insights from the noise, and the creativity & divergent thinking to evaluate multiple solutions. Logical thinking, per the traditions of formal logic, are more about proper process…
label r/innovation
dataType comment
communityName r/Innovation
datetime 2024-01-07
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwwdmtoX0k5SmNKY3lNUHJkRHk5VXN6bTNoMWZwckhIWWFqbWRxMW5aT2ctZmcwVnNBSVFST0t0RU9pblVVRU5Xdm1hYzRpYklpSFNMVjhiSGhWYzFCbVE9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9FRWR0OTJXckI0ZjRmaUlwTkQxd0cwYmFpWHdoejNMeXdJM2FxYjczektGUVZYV2s0NXpPcE5fd1k1d2VwMjFHdzNWZ2pFbEQ5ZEYyQlYwUnhodEFYVDBNc3dScFJkdnd3R2tCR0xGclVLTThDUWVDWHZNOGJtUVU2eVFUeUpTUHZSUFZGWlAyOTdGbVN3YWp6TWl1alVHVURUbGU3SVEyWk9nTE1ETnFOZTFBPQ==

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Okay, so, lots to unpack here.\n\nFirstly, separate logical thinking and problem solving. These are different mental skills. Problem solving usually involves discipline to stick to a problem definition approach, the intelligence to find the insights that render the problem solvable, the wisdom to separate the important insights from the noise, and the creativity & divergent thinking to evaluate multiple solutions.\n\nLogical thinking, per the traditions of formal logic, are more about proper processing of evidence and assumptions while remaining cognizant of (and attempting to avoid) the logical fallacies that constantly lay in wait to trip humans up.\n\nI am a deeply logical human and formally trained in analytical philosophy and this is not something that most people want and appreciate, practically, in the real world. The most logical person you know is either a terrible pedant or a misanthrope.\n\nSo, let’s stick with problem solving.\n\nWhat you would want to do is identify how many meaningful questions a person could ask in response to a problem, how they might go about attempting to develop learning against those questions, and the quantity of possible solutions pathways they would consider.\n\nYou could pick a handful of thorny problems and write approaches to each.\n\nAnd in ancient times, the first step in being a genius was to be independently wealthy. Otherwise, you were never educated — possibly illiterate — and toiled. When you were wealthy, you now had to decide whether to focus on the affairs of the day or on the theoretical learning. It is the theoretical learning that survives with a name attached. But know that some human devised and designed the Roman aqueducts. We don’t know who, but they were every bit the genius of the theoretical scholars.\n\nOn this sub, I imagine, you’ll find more aqueduct builders than Nobel prize winners.",
  "label": "r/innovation",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/Innovation",
  "datetime": "2024-01-07",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwwdmtoX0k5SmNKY3lNUHJkRHk5VXN6bTNoMWZwckhIWWFqbWRxMW5aT2ctZmcwVnNBSVFST0t0RU9pblVVRU5Xdm1hYzRpYklpSFNMVjhiSGhWYzFCbVE9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9FRWR0OTJXckI0ZjRmaUlwTkQxd0cwYmFpWHdoejNMeXdJM2FxYjczektGUVZYV2s0NXpPcE5fd1k1d2VwMjFHdzNWZ2pFbEQ5ZEYyQlYwUnhodEFYVDBNc3dScFJkdnd3R2tCR0xGclVLTThDUWVDWHZNOGJtUVU2eVFUeUpTUHZSUFZGWlAyOTdGbVN3YWp6TWl1alVHVURUbGU3SVEyWk9nTE1ETnFOZTFBPQ=="
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information