Row 2843

Row ID: 2843 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 2843 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

Remember that terrifying scenario everyone's been painting about a potential second Trump term? Yeah, the New York Times just published a whole article on it, acting like they just cracked the code and unearthed some earth-shattering secrets. Except, guess what? The Washington Post already did basically the same story a month ago!

So, what's the big deal about the NYT piece, then? Well, not much, honestly. It's the same old, same old: Trump going after the Bidens, installing his cronies everywhere, maybe pulling us out of NATO and playing patty-cake with Mexican gangs. Yawn. We've heard it all before. Here is the summary: [https://www.nationalmemo.com/new-york-times-trump](https://www.nationalmemo.com/new-york-times-trump)

The only kinda-new bit is the whole "Trump might ditch NATO and focus on Mexico" thing. But even that feels like they're just grasping at straws, trying to find something the Post missed. And honestly, it's kinda pathetic.

But here's the real kicker, folks: the most interesting part of the entire article is buried deep in the weeds. Apparently, the Times based their whole story on what Trump has said publicly and interviews with "campaign advisers, including some who spoke with The New York Times at the request of the campaign."

Now, I'm all for juicy Trump nuggets, but this whole "insider access" braggadocio just reeks of BS. We're talking about Maggie Haberman and Charlie Savage here, the self-proclaimed "Trump whisperers" of the Times. They're basically strutting around like they're the only ones who can get close to the man, like they're sipping tea in Mar-a-Lago and getting the lowdown straight from the horse's mouth.

Look, I get it. Trump's a goldmine for clicks and controversy. But can the Times please stop treating his authoritarian wet dreams like some kind of exclusive scoop? This isn't some political white paper, folks, it's a goddamn blueprint for dismantling democracy. And the Times, with all their resources, should be doing way better than just regurgitating Trump's talking points and playing into his "I alone can fix it" narrative.

Instead of relying on these "Trump whisperers" for scraps, the Times should be digging deep. They should have a team on Stephen Miller, another on Trump's shady finances, and maybe even one figuring out what Putin's doing to help get him re-elected. Because let's face it, nearly all the corruption in Trump's orbit is happening right out in the open. He practically brags about breaking the law at his rallies!

Remember 2016? The Times wasted inches on garbage like Hillary's emails while ignoring the real threats like Russian bots and Roger Stone. This time, they're fixated on non-existent inflation and parroting Trump's every lie. It's like they're willfully blind to the actual danger this man poses.

The New York Times is supposed to be the paper of record, but when it comes to Trump, they're failing us every single day. They need to stop playing his game and start doing some real journalism. Otherwise, they're just as complicit in his rise as anyone else.

So, what do you guys think? Is the Times just phoning it in with their Trump coverage? Or am I being too harsh? Let's hear it in the comments!

FieldValue
text Remember that terrifying scenario everyone's been painting about a potential second Trump term? Yeah, the New York Times just published a whole article on it, acting like they just cracked the code and unearthed some earth-shattering secrets. Except, guess what? The Washington Post already did basically the same story a month ago! So, what's the big deal about the NYT piece, then? Well, not much, honestly. It's the same old, same old: Trump going after the Bidens, installing his cronies everywh…
label r/media_criticism
dataType post
communityName r/media_criticism
datetime 2023-12-29
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwwbHdLUFpKMHBNdm5kVC0yMkhjNl9HY2FZTlVHWmtnZmRpbXhVbGdpalZnSTZRSkI2SlZWYlo4YnhOajZoQkFienRaejNoRkRlMTNuaVliSmVUVUZrSnc9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9FOGYtekRIaXkwZFRUUDV1QnFMSVNZb3BscW95MUJLX0VVNGcyTTdseHFXMng1RGg1eTdwaWM4b1BxNGNDQnBLNXVlc3FDdDBXcnpsRExGRVRBSjFLTkxpc2xqbmVFNXNZS3dQT3Z6Mi1OMEtwM0tWS1FNNGh6WmNEZnR3aG1RNkpoNjBPYjZzM1ZZcC1Dak9VYXJWLWFpdmszMVZxMm1rZGJvTFFwRHViY1YtVXc0N0sxMnBHM1Y4TjlnNXFSelhRa1h1OFQ4c1pCUnZlcmI5SklpZ2tPZz09

Raw Record

{
  "text": "Remember that terrifying scenario everyone's been painting about a potential second Trump term? Yeah, the New York Times just published a whole article on it, acting like they just cracked the code and unearthed some earth-shattering secrets. Except, guess what? The Washington Post already did basically the same story a month ago!\n\nSo, what's the big deal about the NYT piece, then? Well, not much, honestly. It's the same old, same old: Trump going after the Bidens, installing his cronies everywhere, maybe pulling us out of NATO and playing patty-cake with Mexican gangs. Yawn. We've heard it all before. Here is the summary:  \n[https://www.nationalmemo.com/new-york-times-trump](https://www.nationalmemo.com/new-york-times-trump)\n\nThe only kinda-new bit is the whole \"Trump might ditch NATO and focus on Mexico\" thing. But even that feels like they're just grasping at straws, trying to find something the Post missed. And honestly, it's kinda pathetic.\n\nBut here's the real kicker, folks: the most interesting part of the entire article is buried deep in the weeds. Apparently, the Times based their whole story on what Trump has said publicly and interviews with \"campaign advisers, including some who spoke with The New York Times at the request of the campaign.\"\n\nNow, I'm all for juicy Trump nuggets, but this whole \"insider access\" braggadocio just reeks of BS. We're talking about Maggie Haberman and Charlie Savage here, the self-proclaimed \"Trump whisperers\" of the Times. They're basically strutting around like they're the only ones who can get close to the man, like they're sipping tea in Mar-a-Lago and getting the lowdown straight from the horse's mouth.\n\nLook, I get it. Trump's a goldmine for clicks and controversy. But can the Times please stop treating his authoritarian wet dreams like some kind of exclusive scoop? This isn't some political white paper, folks, it's a goddamn blueprint for dismantling democracy. And the Times, with all their resources, should be doing way better than just regurgitating Trump's talking points and playing into his \"I alone can fix it\" narrative.\n\nInstead of relying on these \"Trump whisperers\" for scraps, the Times should be digging deep. They should have a team on Stephen Miller, another on Trump's shady finances, and maybe even one figuring out what Putin's doing to help get him re-elected. Because let's face it, nearly all the corruption in Trump's orbit is happening right out in the open. He practically brags about breaking the law at his rallies!\n\nRemember 2016? The Times wasted inches on garbage like Hillary's emails while ignoring the real threats like Russian bots and Roger Stone. This time, they're fixated on non-existent inflation and parroting Trump's every lie. It's like they're willfully blind to the actual danger this man poses.\n\nThe New York Times is supposed to be the paper of record, but when it comes to Trump, they're failing us every single day. They need to stop playing his game and start doing some real journalism. Otherwise, they're just as complicit in his rise as anyone else.\n\nSo, what do you guys think? Is the Times just phoning it in with their Trump coverage? Or am I being too harsh? Let's hear it in the comments!",
  "label": "r/media_criticism",
  "dataType": "post",
  "communityName": "r/media_criticism",
  "datetime": "2023-12-29",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwwbHdLUFpKMHBNdm5kVC0yMkhjNl9HY2FZTlVHWmtnZmRpbXhVbGdpalZnSTZRSkI2SlZWYlo4YnhOajZoQkFienRaejNoRkRlMTNuaVliSmVUVUZrSnc9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9FOGYtekRIaXkwZFRUUDV1QnFMSVNZb3BscW95MUJLX0VVNGcyTTdseHFXMng1RGg1eTdwaWM4b1BxNGNDQnBLNXVlc3FDdDBXcnpsRExGRVRBSjFLTkxpc2xqbmVFNXNZS3dQT3Z6Mi1OMEtwM0tWS1FNNGh6WmNEZnR3aG1RNkpoNjBPYjZzM1ZZcC1Dak9VYXJWLWFpdmszMVZxMm1rZGJvTFFwRHViY1YtVXc0N0sxMnBHM1Y4TjlnNXFSelhRa1h1OFQ4c1pCUnZlcmI5SklpZ2tPZz09"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information