Row 2695

Row ID: 2695 | Dataset Entry | Axioma AXP Content Repository

Content Data

This page contains data entry 2695 from the Axioma AXP content repository. The structured data below represents the complete record for this entry.

* Stealth: While I question the usefulness and value proposition, I won't make you remove it -- just be aware these won't matter much given a) the size of the ship; b) it's escorts and/or air wings would give away its position anyways. * Aircraft: This is acceptable in a pinch but typically not more than 80. * Production: given the advanced propulsions methods I won't allow the retro to 2025. As such, first ship being laid down is in 2029, is coming out 2033, commissioned in 2037. I don't think the navy has the capabilities to accept a new carrier every year. I'd prefer 1 every 2 years initially, and then as per the mechanics (6mo/1y every 4th). In any case, I'm limiting the size of the class to **10+5 option** and this is being generous given the lack of justification for this amount of carriers. The 5 as option will only be allowed if an additional [EVENT] post is made justifying the need for them. The fusion reactors will count as a design upgrade.

FieldValue
text * Stealth: While I question the usefulness and value proposition, I won't make you remove it -- just be aware these won't matter much given a) the size of the ship; b) it's escorts and/or air wings would give away its position anyways. * Aircraft: This is acceptable in a pinch but typically not more than 80. * Production: given the advanced propulsions methods I won't allow the retro to 2025. As such, first ship being laid down is in 2029, is coming out 2033, commissioned in 2037. I don't think …
label r/globalpowers
dataType comment
communityName r/GlobalPowers
datetime 2023-11-24
username_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwweG4yMnVJQ21kZDNwQjFrQzU4YnJtX29Qdm5fb0xUZjlIUnl3enpEbmhFLVBsRGlSYmY0QmlTUHV4VnliaTRLY1k4Q2NCSDlWVlB1dmRPZVpzZnYyZ1E9PQ==
url_encoded Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9FOUd2SzVkRnpOaTh5YTRqcjBYT19PM1NOaW13TU1JOTIxcmpDSlNpRkl4QmhfcFR3TDl0OHp5UDE1QmMtRHdTVjJHYUhoRDJpMU1UT3Y4VE81dzkwU3JnRFB6RktidXA4ZmtHdHlJMHZjOU1SM2NvX3BkSHVPZ1l2T2JPMVpTRF9BNkl6Rm5ZNnl6ZXY1aXRfMXhYTjFuMmRYYm50VkM3eW55Y2xTbEE3X0tYanFxZDB5bEpZTHMwdmIzVy1xT0FO

Raw Record

{
  "text": "* Stealth: While I question the usefulness and value proposition, I won't make you remove it -- just be aware these won't matter much given a) the size of the ship; b) it's escorts and/or air wings would give away its position anyways.\n* Aircraft: This is acceptable in a pinch but typically not more than 80.\n* Production: given the advanced propulsions methods I won't allow the retro to 2025. As such, first ship being laid down is in 2029, is coming out 2033, commissioned in 2037. I don't think the navy has the capabilities to accept a new carrier every year. I'd prefer 1 every 2 years initially, and then as per the mechanics (6mo/1y every 4th). In any case, I'm limiting the size of the class to **10+5 option** and this is being generous given the lack of justification for this amount of carriers. The 5 as option will only be allowed if an additional [EVENT] post is made justifying the need for them. The fusion reactors will count as a design upgrade.",
  "label": "r/globalpowers",
  "dataType": "comment",
  "communityName": "r/GlobalPowers",
  "datetime": "2023-11-24",
  "username_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5LakwweG4yMnVJQ21kZDNwQjFrQzU4YnJtX29Qdm5fb0xUZjlIUnl3enpEbmhFLVBsRGlSYmY0QmlTUHV4VnliaTRLY1k4Q2NCSDlWVlB1dmRPZVpzZnYyZ1E9PQ==",
  "url_encoded": "Z0FBQUFBQm5Lak9FOUd2SzVkRnpOaTh5YTRqcjBYT19PM1NOaW13TU1JOTIxcmpDSlNpRkl4QmhfcFR3TDl0OHp5UDE1QmMtRHdTVjJHYUhoRDJpMU1UT3Y4VE81dzkwU3JnRFB6RktidXA4ZmtHdHlJMHZjOU1SM2NvX3BkSHVPZ1l2T2JPMVpTRF9BNkl6Rm5ZNnl6ZXY1aXRfMXhYTjFuMmRYYm50VkM3eW55Y2xTbEE3X0tYanFxZDB5bEpZTHMwdmIzVy1xT0FO"
}
Explore Dataset Explore Row

Entry Information